PHYSICS OF GASES, PLASMAS, AND ELECTRIC DISCHARGES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Influence of air pressure on the performance of plasma synthetic jet actuator |
Yang Li(李洋)1, Min Jia(贾敏)1, Yun Wu(吴云)2, Ying-hong Li(李应红)1, Hao-hua Zong(宗豪华)2, Hui-min Song(宋慧敏)1, Hua Liang(梁华)1 |
1. Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710038, China; 2. Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China |
|
|
Abstract Plasma synthetic jet actuator (PSJA) has a wide application prospect in the high-speed flow control field for its high jet velocity. In this paper, the influence of the air pressure on the performance of a two-electrode PSJA is investigated by the schlieren method in a large range from 7 kPa to 100 kPa. The energy consumed by the PSJA is roughly the same for all the pressure levels. Traces of the precursor shock wave velocity and the jet front velocity vary a lot for different pressures. The precursor shock wave velocity first decreases gradually and then remains at 345 m/s as the air pressure increases. The peak jet front velocity always appears at the first appearance of a jet, and it decreases gradually with the increase of the air pressure. A maximum precursor shock wave velocity of 520 m/s and a maximum jet front velocity of 440 m/s are observed at the pressure of 7 kPa. The averaged jet velocity in one period ranges from 44 m/s to 54 m/s for all air pressures, and it drops with the rising of the air pressure. High velocities of the precursor shock wave and the jet front indicate that this type of PSJA can still be used to influence the high-speed flow field at 7 kPa.
|
Received: 29 September 2015
Revised: 14 April 2016
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
52.50.Dg
|
(Plasma sources)
|
|
52.80.Mg
|
(Arcs; sparks; lightning; atmospheric electricity)
|
|
52.80.Vp
|
(Discharge in vacuum)
|
|
47.80.Jk
|
(Flow visualization and imaging)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51407197, 51522606, 51336011, 91541120, and 11472306). |
Corresponding Authors:
Yun Wu
E-mail: wuyun1223@126.com
|
Cite this article:
Yang Li(李洋), Min Jia(贾敏), Yun Wu(吴云), Ying-hong Li(李应红), Hao-hua Zong(宗豪华), Hui-min Song(宋慧敏), Hua Liang(梁华) Influence of air pressure on the performance of plasma synthetic jet actuator 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 095205
|
[1] |
Li Y H, Wu Y and Li J 2012 Int. J. Flow Control 4 1756
|
[2] |
Zhao G Y, Li Y H and Liang H 2015 Acta. Phys. Sin. 64 015101 (in Chinese)
|
[3] |
Zhao G Y, Li Y H, Liang H and Han M H 2015 Exp. Fluids 56 1864
|
[4] |
Popkin S H, Taylor T M and Cybyk B Z 2013 J. Hopkins Apl. Tech. D 32 404
|
[5] |
Cybyk B Z, Wilkerson J T and Grossman K R 2004 2nd AIAA Flow Control Conference, June 28-July 1, 2004, Portland, Oregon, p. 2131
|
[6] |
Grossman K R, Cybyk B Z and VanWi D M 2004 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January 5-8 ,2004, Reno, Nevada, p. 0089
|
[7] |
Ko H S, Haack S J and Land H B 2010 Flow Meas. Instrum. 21 443
|
[8] |
Haack S J, Land H and Cybyk B 2008 4th Flow Control Conference, June 23-26, 2008, Seattle, Washington, p. 3759
|
[9] |
Cybyk B Z, Grossman K R and Wilkerson J T 2005 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January 10-13, 2005, Reno, Nevada p. 401
|
[10] |
Cybyk B Z, Simon D H and Land H B 2006 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January 9-12, 2006, Reno, Nevada, p. 478
|
[11] |
Cybyk B Z, Wilkerson J T and Grossman K R 2003 33rd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Orlando 23-26 , Florida, American, p. 3711
|
[12] |
Belinger A, Hardy P and Barricau P 2011 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 44 365201
|
[13] |
Berlinger A, Naude N and Cambronne J P 2014 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47 345202
|
[14] |
Belinger A, Hardy P and Gherardi N 2011 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 39 2334
|
[15] |
Jin D, Li Y H and Jia M 2013 Plasma Sci. Tech. 15 1033
|
[16] |
Santhanakrishnan A and Jacob J D 2007 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40 637
|
[17] |
Santhanakrishnan A, Reasor D A and LeBeau R P 2009 Phys. Fluids 2009 21 043602
|
[18] |
Reedy T M and Kale N V 2013 AIAA J. 51 2027
|
[19] |
Haack S J, Taylor T and Emhoff J 2010 5th Flow Control Conference, June 28-July 1, 2010, Chicago, Illinois, p. 4979
|
[20] |
Popkin S H, Cybyk B Z and Land III H B 2013 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, January 7-10, 2013, Texas, American, p. 0322
|
[21] |
Golbabaei A M, Knight D and Wilkinson S 2015 AIAA J. 53 501
|
[22] |
Shin J 2010 Chin. J. Aeronaut. 23 518
|
[23] |
Zong H H, Wu Y and Li Y H 2015 Phys. Fluids 27 027105
|
[24] |
Zong H H, Cui W and Wu Y 2015 Sensor Actuat. A: Phys. 222 114
|
[25] |
Emerick T, Ali M Y and Foster C 2014 Exp. Fluids 55 1858
|
[26] |
Wang L, Xia Z X and Luo Z B 2014 Sci. China-Phys. Mech. 57 2309
|
[27] |
Wang L, Xia Z X and Luo Z B 2014 Acta. Phys. Sin. 63 194702 (in Chinese)
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|