ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Induced magnetic field stagnation point flow of nanofluid past convectively heated stretching sheet with Buoyancy effects |
Tanzila Hayat, S Nadeem |
Department of Mathematics, Quaid-I-Azam University 45320, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan |
|
|
Abstract This paper presents the buoyancy effects on the magneto-hydrodynamics stagnation point flow of an incompressible, viscous, and electrically conducting nanofluid over a vertically stretching sheet. The impacts of an induced magnetic field and viscous dissipation are taken into account. Both assisting and opposing flows are considered. The overseeing nonlinear partial differential equations with the associated boundary conditions are reduced to an arrangement of coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations utilizing similarity transformations and are then illuminated analytically by using the optimal homotopy investigation strategy (OHAM). Graphs are introduced and examined for different parameters of the velocity, temperature, and concentration profile. Additionally, numerical estimations of the skin friction, local Nusselt number, and local Sherwood number are explored using numerical values.
|
Received: 25 March 2016
Revised: 19 May 2016
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
44.20.+b
|
(Boundary layer heat flow)
|
|
44.05.+e
|
(Analytical and numerical techniques)
|
|
47.15.-x
|
(Laminar flows)
|
|
Cite this article:
Tanzila Hayat, S Nadeem Induced magnetic field stagnation point flow of nanofluid past convectively heated stretching sheet with Buoyancy effects 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 114701
|
[1] |
Choi U S 1995 ASME FED 231 99
|
[2] |
Azmi W H, Hamid Abdul K, Usri N A, Mamat Razilman and Sharma K V 2016 Int. Comm. Heat Mass Trans. 75 13
|
[3] |
Li X K, Zou C J, Zhou L and Qi A H 2016 Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 97 631
|
[4] |
Prabhakaran M, Manikandan S, Suganthi K S, Vinodhan V L and Rajan K S 2016 Appl. Therm. Eng. 102 329
|
[5] |
Crane L J 1970 Z. Angew Math. Phys. 21 645
|
[6] |
Nadeem S and Lee C 2012 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 7 94
|
[7] |
Nadeem S and UlHaq R J. Aerosp. Eng. 10 1061
|
[8] |
Nadeem S, Mehmood R and Akbar N S 2013 Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 57 679
|
[9] |
Nadeem S, UlHaq R and Lee C 2012 Sci. Iranica. 19 1550
|
[10] |
Mahapatra T R and Gupta A S 2001 Acta Mech. 152 191
|
[11] |
Makinde O D 2012 Meccanica 47 1173
|
[12] |
Choi S 1995 ASME FED 66 99
|
[13] |
Makinde O D and Aziz A 2011 Int. J. Therm. Sci. 50 1326
|
[14] |
Kuznetsov A V and Nield D A 2010 Int. J. Therm. Sci. 49 243
|
[15] |
Eastman J A, Choi U S, Li S, Yu W and Thompson L J 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 78 718
|
[16] |
Li J F and Li Z Y 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 047305
|
[17] |
Mostafa M, Hayat T, Pop I, Asghar S and Obaidat S 2011 Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 54 5588
|
[18] |
Khan W A and Pop I 2010 Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 53 2477
|
[19] |
Khan W A and Aziz A 2011 Int. J. Therm. Sci. 50 1207
|
[20] |
Ibrahim W, Shankar B and Nandeppanavar M M 2013 Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 56 1
|
[21] |
Ishak A, Nazar R and Pop I 2007 ASME J. Heat Trans. 129 1087
|
[22] |
Ishak A, Nazar R, Arifin R and Pop I 2007 ASME J. Heat Trans. 129 1212
|
[23] |
Lok Y Y, Amin N, Campean D and Pop I 2005 Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow. 15 654
|
[24] |
Ishak A, Nazar R and Pop I 2008 Comput. Math. Appl. 56 3188
|
[25] |
Zhang C L, Zheng L C, Zhang X X and Chen G 2015 Appl. Math. Model. 39 165
|
[26] |
Lin Y H, Zheng L C, Zhang X X, Ma L X and Chen G 2015 Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 84 903
|
[27] |
Sui J Z, Zheng L C, Zhang X X and Chen G 2015 Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 85 1023
|
[28] |
Lin Y H, Zheng L C and Zhang X X 2014 Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 77 708
|
[29] |
Zheng L C, Zhang C L, Zhang X X and Zhang J H 2013 Journal of the Franklin Institute 350 990
|
[30] |
Raptis A and Perdikis C 1984 Methods Appl. 8 749
|
[31] |
Kumari M, Takhar H S and Nath G 1990 Waerme-Stoffuebertrag 25 331
|
[32] |
Takhar H S, Kumari M and Nath G 1993 Arch. Appl. Mech. 63 313
|
[33] |
Ali F M, Nazar R, Arifin N M and Pop I 2011 Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 133
|
[34] |
Ali K and Ashraf M 2012 World Applied Sciences Journal 16 1615
|
[35] |
Liao S J 2003 Capman Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton
|
[36] |
Ghotbi A R 2009 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Num. Simulat. 14 2653
|
[37] |
Liao S J 2008 Adv. Mechan. 15 1
|
[38] |
Abbasbandy S 2006 Phys. Lett. A 360 109
|
[39] |
Nadeem S and Saleem S 2013 J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 44 596
|
[40] |
Ahmada A, Asghar S and Alsaedi A 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 014702
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|