| ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Hydromagnetic flow of a Cu–water nanofluid past a moving wedge with viscous dissipation |
| A. M. Salema b, Galal Ismailc, Rania Fathyc |
a Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, Qassim University, Al-Muznib, Saudi Arabia;
b Department of Basic Science, Faculty of Computers and Informatics, Suez Canal University, Egypt;
c Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Egypt |
|
|
|
|
Abstract A numerical study is performed to investigate the flow and heat transfer at the surface of a permeable wedge immersed in a copper (Cu)-water-based nanofluid in the presence of magnetic field and viscous dissipation using a nanofluid model proposed by Tiwari and Das (Tiwari I K and Das M K 2007 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 50 2002). A similarity solution for the transformed governing equation is obtained, and those equations are solved by employing a numerical shooting technique with a fourth-order Runge-Kutta integration scheme. A comparison with previously published work is carried out and shows that they are in good agreement with each other. The effects of velocity ratio parameter <λ, solid volume fraction ø, magnetic field M, viscous dissipation Ec, and suction parameter Fw on the fluid flow and heat transfer characteristics are discussed. The unique and dual solutions for self-similar equations of the flow and heat transfer are analyzed numerically. Moreover, the range of the velocity ratio parameter for which the solution exists increases in the presence of magnetic field and suction parameter.
|
Received: 03 June 2013
Revised: 18 July 2013
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
PACS:
|
44.20.+b
|
(Boundary layer heat flow)
|
| |
44.30.+v
|
(Heat flow in porous media)
|
| |
47.65.-d
|
(Magnetohydrodynamics and electrohydrodynamics)
|
| |
47.61.-k
|
(Micro- and nano- scale flow phenomena)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
A. M. Salem
E-mail: azizsalem32@hotmail.com
|
| About author: 44.20.+b; 44.30.+v; 47.65.-d; 47.61.-k |
Cite this article:
A. M. Salem, Galal Ismail, Rania Fathy Hydromagnetic flow of a Cu–water nanofluid past a moving wedge with viscous dissipation 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 044402
|
| [1] |
Choi S U S 1995 ASME International Mechanica Engineering Congress and Exposition, San Francsco, USA, ASME, FED 231/MD 99
|
| [2] |
Wong K F V and Leone O D 2010 Applications of Nanofluids: Current and Future, Adv. Mech. Eng. 2010: 519659
|
| [3] |
Khanafer K, Vafai K and Lightstone M 2003 J. Heat Mass Transfer 46 3639
|
| [4] |
Maiga S E B, Palm S J, Nguyen C T, Roy G and Galanis N 2005 Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 26 530
|
| [5] |
Jou R Y and Tzeng S C 2006 Int. Commun. Heat Transfer 33 727
|
| [6] |
Tiwari I K and Das M K 2007 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 50 2002
|
| [7] |
Hang K S, Lee Ji H and Jang S P 2007 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 50 4003
|
| [8] |
Oztop H F and Abu-Nada E 2008 Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 29 1326
|
| [9] |
Muthtamilselvan M, Kandaswamy P and Lee J 2010 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 15 1501
|
| [10] |
Buongiorno J 2006 ASME J. Heat Transfer 128 240
|
| [11] |
Kuznetsov A V and Nield D A 2010 Int. J. Therm. Sci. 49 243
|
| [12] |
Abu-Nada E and Oztop H F 2009 Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 30 669
|
| [13] |
Riley N and Weidman P D 1989 SIAM J. Appl. Math. 49 1350
|
| [14] |
Yacob N A, Ishak A I and Pop I 2011 Int. J. Thermal Sci. 50 133
|
| [15] |
Falkner V M and Skan S W 1931 Phil. Mag. 12 865
|
| [16] |
Devi A and Kandasamy R 2002 Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 29 707
|
| [17] |
Kandasamy R M, Azme B and Rozaini R 2012 Int. J. Thermal Sci. 65 196 Kandasamy R and Anjali Dev S P 2002 J. Energy, Heat Mass Transfer 24 175
|
| [18] |
Kumari M 1998 Int. J. Engin. Sci. 36 299
|
| [19] |
Bachok N, Ishak A and Pop I 2010 Int. J. Thermal Sci. 49 1663
|
| [20] |
Xiaohong S W, Zheng L, Zhang X and Zhang J 2012 Chem. Engin. Sci. 78 1
|
| [21] |
Hamad M A A, Pop I and Ismail A I 2011 Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications 12 1338
|
| [22] |
Gebhart B 1962 J. Fluid Mech. 14 225
|
| [23] |
Pantokratoras A 2004 Appl. Math. Model. 6 553
|
| [24] |
Zueco J and Beg O A 2009 Math. Comput. Model. 50 439
|
| [25] |
Muhaimin I, Kandasamy R, Hashim I and Ruhaila 2008 Int. J. Appl. Math. Statistics 13 9
|
| [26] |
Chandrasekar M and Baskaran S 2007 Theor. Appl. Mech. 34 197
|
| [27] |
Makinde O D 2012 Appl. Math. Mech. 33 1442
|
| [28] |
Na T Y 1974 Computational Method in Engineering Boundary Value Problems (New York: Academic Press)
|
| [29] |
Wang C Y 2008 Int. J. Nonlinear Mech. 43 377
|
| [30] |
Bachok N, Ishak A and Pop I 2010 Phys. Lett. A 347 4075
|
| [31] |
Krishnendu B 2011 Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 38 917
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
