Cavity-assisted quantum computing in a silicon nanostructure
Tang Bao (唐宝)a, Qin Hao (秦豪)a, Zhang Rong (张融)a, Liu Jin-Ming (刘金明)b, Xue Peng (薛鹏)a b
a Department of Physics, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China;
b State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
Abstract We present a scheme of quantum computing with charge qubits corresponding to one excess electron shared between dangling-bond pairs of surface silicon atoms that couple to a microwave stripline resonator on a chip. By choosing a certain evolution time, we propose the realization of a set of universal single- and two-qubit logical gates. Due to its intrinsic stability and scalability, the silicon dangling-bond charge qubit can be regarded as one of the most promising candidates for quantum computation. Compared to the previous schemes on quantum computing with silicon bulk systems, our scheme shows such advantages as a long coherent time and direct control and readout.
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11004029 and 11174052), the Ph. D. Program of the Ministry of Education of China, the Excellent Young Teachers Program of Southeast University, China, the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2011CB921203), and the Open Fund from the State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy of East China Normal University, China.
Tang Bao (唐宝), Qin Hao (秦豪), Zhang Rong (张融), Liu Jin-Ming (刘金明), Xue Peng (薛鹏) Cavity-assisted quantum computing in a silicon nanostructure 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 050307
[1]
Grover L K 1996 Proceedings, 28th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC) p. 212
[2]
Shor P W 1994 Proc. 35nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Shafi Goldwasser, ed.) p. 124
[3]
Xue P and Xiao Y F 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 140501
[4]
Han C, Xue P and Guo G C 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 034301
[5]
Xue P, Han C, Yu B, Lin X M and Guo G C 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 052318
[6]
Xue P 2011 Chin. Phys Lett. 28 050307
[7]
Xue P 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 070305
[8]
Zhang D Y and Zhan M S 1999 Chin. Phys. 8 269
[9]
Xue P and Wu J Z 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 010308
[10]
Xue P 2010 Chin. Phys. Lett. 27 060301
[11]
Grover L K 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 325
[12]
Andresen S E S, Brenner R, Wellard C J, Yang C, Hopf T, Escott C C, Clark R G, Dzurak A S, Jamieson D N and Hollenberg L C L 2007 Nano Lett. 7 2000
[13]
DiVincezo D P 2000 Fortschr. Phys. 48 771
[14]
Petta J R, Johnson A C, Taylor J M, Laird E A, Yacoby A, Lukin M D, Marcus C M, Hanson M P and Gossard A C 2005 Science 309 2180
[15]
Levy J 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 147902
[16]
Taylor J M and Lukin M D 2006 arXiv: cond-mat/0605144
[17]
Xue P 2010 Phys. Lett. A 374 2601
[18]
Xue P and Sanders B C 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 085326
[19]
Shi Z G, Chen X W, Zhu X X and Song K H 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 910
[20]
Hayashi T, Fujisawa T, Cheong H D, Jeong Y H and Hirayama Y 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 226804
[21]
Gorman J, Hasko D G and Williams D A 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 90502
[22]
Xue P 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 100310
[23]
Xue P 2011 Phys. Scr. 84 045002
[24]
Xue P 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 052331
[25]
Wallraff A, Schuster D I, Blais A, Frunzio L, Huang R S, Majer J, Kumar S, Girvin S M and Schoelkopf R J 2004 Nature 431 162
[26]
Childress L, Sorensen A S and Lukin M D 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 042302
[27]
Blais A, Huang R S, Wallraff A, Girvin S M and Schoelkopf R J 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 062320
[28]
Loss D and DiVincenzo D P 1998 Phys. Rev. A 57 120
[29]
Walls D and Milburn G 1994 Quantum Optics (Berlin: Spinger-Verlag)
[30]
Sanders B C, Hollenberg L C L, Edmundson D and Edmundson A 2008 New J. Phys. 10 125005
[31]
Lemke B P and Haneman D 1978 Phys. Rev. B 17 1893
[32]
Livadaru L, Xue P, Shaterzadeh-Yazdi Z, DiLabio G A, Mutus J, Pitters J L, Sanders B C and Wolkow R A 2010 New J. Phys. 12 083018
[33]
Haider M B, Pitters J L, DiLabio G A, Livadaru L, Mutus J Y and Wolkow R A 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 46805
[34]
Huang W Q 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 064207
[35]
Jaynes E T and Cummings F W 1963 Proc. IEEE 51 89
[36]
Barenco A, Bennett C H, Cleve R, Divincenzo D P, Margolus N, Shor P, Sleator T, Smolin J A and Weinfurter H 1995 Phys. Rev. A 52 3547
[37]
Zheng Y Z, Gu Y J, Chen L B and Guo G C 2002 Chin. Phys. 11 529
[38]
James D F and Jerke J 2007 Canadian J. Phys. 85 625
[39]
Barrett S D and Milburn G J 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 155307
Qubits based on semiconductor quantum dots Xin Zhang(张鑫), Hai-Ou Li(李海欧), Ke Wang(王柯), Gang Cao(曹刚), Ming Xiao(肖明), Guo-Ping Guo(郭国平). Chin. Phys. B, 2018, 27(2): 020305.
Spectroscopy and coherent manipulation of single and coupled flux qubits Wu Yu-Lin (吴玉林), Deng Hui (邓辉), Huang Ke-Qiang (黄克强), Tian Ye (田野), Yu Hai-Feng (于海峰), Xue Guang-Ming (薛光明), Jin Yi-Rong (金贻荣), Li Jie (李洁), Zhao Shi-Ping (赵士平), Zheng Dong-Ning (郑东宁). Chin. Phys. B, 2013, 22(9): 090312.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text
Abstract
Cited
Altmetric
blogs
tweeters
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
