|
|
Comparative study of travelling wave and numerical solutions for the coupled short pulse (CSP) equation |
Vikas Kumar, R. K. Gupta, Ram Jiwari |
School of Mathematics and Computer Applications, Thapar University, Patiala 147004, India |
|
|
Abstract The Lie symmetry analysis is performed for coupled short plus (CSP) equation. We derive the infinitesimals that admit the classical symmetry group. Five types arise depending on the nature of the Lie symmetry generator. In all types, we find reductions in terms of system of ordinary differential equations, and exact solutions of the CSP equation are derived, which are compared with numerical solutions using classical fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme.
|
Received: 30 September 2012
Revised: 05 November 2012
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
02.20.Sv
|
(Lie algebras of Lie groups)
|
|
02.30.Jr
|
(Partial differential equations)
|
|
02.60.Cb
|
(Numerical simulation; solution of equations)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
R. K. Gupta
E-mail: rajeshgupta@thapar.edu
|
Cite this article:
Vikas Kumar, R. K. Gupta, Ram Jiwari Comparative study of travelling wave and numerical solutions for the coupled short pulse (CSP) equation 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 050201
|
[1] |
Schäfer T and Wayne C E 2004 Physica D 196 90
|
[2] |
Feng B F 2012 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45 085202
|
[3] |
Olver P J 1993 Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations (Berlin: Springer)
|
[4] |
Bluman G W and Kumei S 1989 Symmetries and Differential Equations (Berlin: Springer)
|
[5] |
Ovsyannikov L V 1982 Group Analysis of Differential Equations (New York: Academic)
|
[6] |
Liu H and Li J 2009 Nonlinear Anal. 71 2126
|
[7] |
Singh K and Gupta R K 2006 Int. J. Eng. Sci. 44 241
|
[8] |
Goyal N and Gupta R K 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 090401
|
[9] |
Kumar S, Singh K and Gupta R K 2012 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 17 1529
|
[10] |
Gupta R K and Singh K 2011 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 16 4189
|
[11] |
Goyal N and Gupta R K 2012 Phys. Scr. 85 015004
|
[12] |
Khalique C M and Adem K R 2011 Math. Comput. Modelling 54 184
|
[13] |
Zayed E M E and Zedan H A 2003 Chaos Soliton. Fract. 16 133
|
[14] |
Zayed E M E, Zedan H A and Gepreel K A 2004 Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 5 221
|
[15] |
Zedan H A and Kawala A M 2003 Appl. Math. Comput. 142 271
|
[16] |
Kawala A M 2008 Numer. Methods Partial Diff. Eq. 33 870
|
[17] |
Biswas A, Yildirim A, Hayat T, Aldossary O M and Sassaman R 2012 Pro. Ro. Acad. Ser. A 13 32
|
[18] |
Triki H, Yildirim A, Hayat T, Aldossary O M and Biswas A 2012 Pro. Ro. Acad. Ser. A 13 103
|
[19] |
Ebadi G, Kara A H, Petkovic M D, Yildirim A and Biswas A 2012 Pro. Ro. Acad. Ser. A 13 215
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|