|
|
|
Electron flux distributions in photodetachment of HF- near an interface: theoretical imaging method study |
| Maryam Nawaz Awan, A. Afaq |
| Centre of Excellence in Solid State Physics, University of the Punjab Lahore-54590, Pakistan |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The electron flux distributions in the photodetachment of HF- near an interface are studied using a two-center model and the theoretical imaging method. An analytical expression for electron flux distributions is derived, which displays oscillations on an observation plane similar to the recent results published by Wang but in the presence of a static electric field. We also discuss the expressions for soft and hard wall cases in detail. A comparison is made with the previous work. The expression is a more general result, and we can deduce from it the electron flux distributions for the photodetachment of H2- near an interface. Finally, we show that the expression reveals similar results as those in [Chin. Phys. B 19 020306 (2010)] when the wall effect is neglected.
|
Received: 11 May 2012
Revised: 02 July 2012
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
PACS:
|
32.80.Gc
|
(Photodetachment of atomic negative ions)
|
| |
03.65.Sq
|
(Semiclassical theories and applications)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
A. Afaq
E-mail: aafaq.cssp@pu.edu.pk
|
Cite this article:
Maryam Nawaz Awan, A. Afaq Electron flux distributions in photodetachment of HF- near an interface: theoretical imaging method study 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 013205
|
| [1] |
Bryant H C, Mohagheghi A and Stewart J E 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 2412
|
| [2] |
Fabrikant I 1980 Sov. Phys. JETP 52 1045
|
| [3] |
Rau A R P and Wong H 1988 Phys. Rev. A 37 632
|
| [4] |
Du M L and Delos J B 1988 Phys. Rev. A 38 5609
|
| [5] |
Du M L 1989 Phys. Rev. A 40 4983
|
| [6] |
Blondel C et al. 2001 J. Phys. B 34 L281
|
| [7] |
Blondel C et al. 2001 Phys. Rev. A 64 052504
|
| [8] |
Yang G, Zheng Y and Chi X 2006 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 39 1855
|
| [9] |
Afaq A and Du M L 2007 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40 1309
|
| [10] |
Wang D H, Ma X G, Wang M S and Yang C L 2006 Chin. Phys. 16 1307
|
| [11] |
Wang D H 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 400
|
| [12] |
Wang D H, Yongjiang Y and Hongrun W 2009 Chin. Optics. Lett. 7 176
|
| [13] |
Wang D H and Huang K Y 2010 Commu. Theor. Phys. 53 898
|
| [14] |
Huang K Y and Wang D H 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 114 8958
|
| [15] |
Wang D H, Wang S S and Tang T T 2011 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80 094301
|
| [16] |
Wang D H 2011 Current Applied Physics 1 1228
|
| [17] |
Wang D H and Huang K Y 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 014113
|
| [18] |
Wang D H 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 020306
|
| [19] |
Wang D H 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 919
|
| [20] |
Afaq A and Du M L 2009 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 105101
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
