|
|
Impact of substrate bias on radiation-induced edge effects in MOSFETs |
Hu Zhi-Yuan(胡志远)a)b)†,Liu Zhang-Li(刘张李)a)b), Shao-Hua(邵华)a),Zhang Zheng-Xuan(张正选)a), Ning Bing-Xu(宁冰旭)a)b), Chen Ming(陈明)a)b), Bi Da-Wei(毕大炜)a),and Zou Shi-Chang(邹世昌)a) |
a Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China; b Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
|
|
Abstract This paper investigates the effects of gamma-ray irradiation on the Shallow-Trench Isolation (STI) leakage currents in 180-nm complementary metal oxide semiconductor technology. No hump effect in the subthreshold region is observed after irradiation, which is considered to be due to the thin STI corner oxide thickness. A negative substrate bias could effectively suppress the STI leakage, but it also impairs the device characteristics. The three-dimensional simulation is introduced to understand the impact of substrate bias. Moreover, we propose a simple method for extracting the best substrate bias value, which not only eliminates the STI leakage but also has the least impact on the device characteristics.
|
Received: 19 April 2011
Revised: 21 June 2011
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
07.80.+b
|
|
|
24.50.+g
|
(Direct reactions)
|
|
Cite this article:
Hu Zhi-Yuan(胡志远), Liu Zhang-Li(刘张李), Shao-Hua(邵华), Zhang Zheng-Xuan(张正选), Ning Bing-Xu(宁冰旭), Chen Ming(陈明), Bi Da-Wei(毕大炜), and Zou Shi-Chang(邹世昌) Impact of substrate bias on radiation-induced edge effects in MOSFETs 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 120702
|
[1] |
Xue S B, Huang R, Huang D T, Wang S H, Tan F, Wang J, An X and Zhang X 2010 Chin. Phys. 19 117307
|
[2] |
Zhang G Q, Guo Q, Lu W and Ren D Y 2004 Chin. Phys. 13 948
|
[3] |
He B P and Yao Z B 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 1985 (in Chinese)
|
[4] |
Saks N S and Ancona M G 1987 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 34 1348
|
[5] |
Li D M, Wang Z H, Huangfu L Y and Guo Q J 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 3760
|
[6] |
En Y F, Lin C L, Luo H W, Qian C, Shi Q, Wang X, Wang X H, Wang Y M, Zhang E X, Zhang Z X and Zhao G R 2006 Chin. Phys. 15 792
|
[7] |
Barnaby H 2006 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 3103
|
[8] |
McLain M, Barnaby H J, Holbert K E, Schrimpf R D, Shah H, Amort A, Baze M and Wert J 2007 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 54 2210
|
[9] |
Faccio F, Barnaby H J, Chen X J, Fleetwood D M, Gonella L, Mclain M and Schrimpf R D 2008 Microelectronics Reliability 48 1000
|
[10] |
Shaneyfelt M R, Dodd P E, Draper B L and Flores R S 1998 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 45 2583
|
[11] |
Niu G, Mathew S J, Banerjee G, Cressler J D, Clark S D, Palmer M J and Subbanna S 1999 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 46 1841
|
[12] |
Turowski M, Raman A and Schrimpf R D 2004 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 51 3166
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|