CROSS DISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Finite size effect of ions and dipoles close to charged interfaces |
Tong Chao-Hui(童朝晖)† and Zhu Yue-Jin(诸跃进) |
Department of Physics, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China |
|
|
Abstract The modified dipolar Poisson--Boltzmann (MDPB) equation, where the electrostatics of the dipolar interactions of solvent molecules and also the finite size effects of ions and dipolar solvent molecules are explicitly taken into account on a mean-field level, is studied numerically for a two-plate system with oppositely charged surfaces. The MDPB equation is solved numerically, using the nonlinear Multigrid method, for one-dimensional finite volume meshes. For a high enough surface charge density, numerical results of the MDPB equation reveal that the effective dielectric constant decreases with the increase of the surface charge density. Furthermore, increasing the salt concentration leads to the decrease of the effective dielectric constant close to the charged surfaces. This decrease of the effective dielectric constant with the surface charge density is opposite to the trend from the dipolar Poisson--Boltzmann (DPB) equation. This seemingly inconsistent result is due to the fact that the mean-field approach breaks down in such highly charged systems where the counterions and dipoles are strongly attracted to the charged surfaces and form a quasi two-dimensional layer. In the weak-coupling regime with the electrostatic coupling parameter (the ratio of Bjerrum length to Gouy--Chapman length) $\varXi < 1$, where the MDPB equation works, the effective dielectric constant is independent of the distance from the charged surfaces and there is no accumulation of dipoles near the charged surfaces. Therefore, there are no physical and computational advantages for the MDPB equation over the modified Poisson--Boltzmann (MPB) equation where the effect of dipolar interactions of solvent dipoles is implicitly taken into account in the renormalised dielectric constant.
|
Received: 20 June 2009
Revised: 27 September 2009
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
77.22.Ch
|
(Permittivity (dielectric function))
|
|
73.25.+i
|
(Surface conductivity and carrier phenomena)
|
|
41.20.Cv
|
(Electrostatics; Poisson and Laplace equations, boundary-value problems)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.~20954001 and
10774079), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of
China (Grant No.~Y7080401), the Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo
City (Grant No.~2009A6100 |
Cite this article:
Tong Chao-Hui(童朝晖) and Zhu Yue-Jin(诸跃进) Finite size effect of ions and dipoles close to charged interfaces 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 048702
|
[1] |
Andelman D 1995 Handbook of Biological Physics: Structure and Dynamics of Membranes] (Vol.1B) ed.\ Lipowsky R and Sackmann E (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science) pp.603--642
|
[2] |
Israelachvili J N 1990 Intermolecular and Surface Forces] 2$^{\rm nd}$ ed.\ (London: Academic Press)
|
[3] |
Henderson D 1992 Fundamentals of Inhomogeneous Fluids} (New York: Dekker)
|
[4] |
Netz R R and Andelman D 2003 Phys. Rep. 380 1
|
[5] |
Lan D, Wang Y R, Yu Y, Ma W J and Li C 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 468
|
[6] |
Jiang H Y, Ren Y K, Ao H R and Antonio R 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 4541
|
[7] |
Debye P and Huckel E 1923 Physik 24 185
|
[8] |
Debye P and Huckel E 1923 Physik 24 305
|
[9] |
Lamperski S, Outhwaite C W and Bhuiyan L B 1996 Mol. Phys. 87 1049
|
[10] |
Kjellander R and Marcelja S 1986 J. Phys. Chem. 90 1230
|
[11] |
Attard P, Mitchell D J and Ninham B W 1988 J. Chem. Phys. 89 4358
|
[12] |
Nordholm S, Penfold R, Jonsson B and Woodward C E 1991 J. Chem. Phys. 95 2048
|
[13] |
Netz R R and Orland H 2000 Eur. Phys. J. E 1 203
|
[14] |
Forsman J 2004 J. Phys. Chem. B 108 9236
|
[15] |
Forsman J 2007 Langmuir 23 5515
|
[16] |
Lau A W C 2008 Phys. Rev.E 77 011502
|
[17] |
Borukhov I, Andelman D and Orland H 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 435
|
[18] |
Borukhov I, Andelman D and Orland H 2000 Electrochim. Acta 46 221
|
[19] |
Bauer B A and Patel S 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 084709
|
[20] |
Zhou X Y and Lu H J 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 441
|
[21] |
Huang J P and Yu K W 2004 Chin. Phys. 13 1065
|
[22] |
Kofinger J and Dellago C 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 080601
|
[23] |
Zhao H P, Liu Z Y and Liu Y Y 2001 Chin. Phys. 10 35
|
[24] |
Abrashkin A, Andelman D and Orland H 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 077801
|
[25] |
Press W H, Teukolsky S A, Vetterling W T and Flannery B P 1992 Numerical Recipe in Fortran 77: the Art of Scientific Computing} 2$^{\rm nd}$ ed.\ (New York: Cambridge University Press) Chapter 19.6
|
[26] |
Tong C, Wu T and Provatas N 2006 Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 14 1447
|
[27] |
Naji A, Jungblut S, Moreira A G and Netz R R 2005 Physica A 352 131
|
[28] |
Boroudjerdi H, Kim Y W, Naji A, Netz R R and Serr A 2005 Phys. Rep. 416 129
|
[29] |
Koehl P, Orland H and Delarue M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 087801
|
[30] |
Wertheim M S 1971 J. Chem. Phys. 55 4291
|
[31] |
Kusalik P G and Patey G N 1988 J. Chem. Phys. 88 7715
|
[32] |
Patra C N and Ghosh S K 1997 J. Chem. Phys. 106 2752
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|