CONDENSED MATTER: STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND THERMAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Interaction of two symmetric monovacancy defects in graphene |
Wen-Yan Xu(徐文焱)1,2, Li-Zhi Zhang(张礼智)1, Li Huang(黄立)1, Yan-De Que(阙炎德)1, Ye-Liang Wang(王业亮)1, Xiao Lin(林晓)1, Shi-Xuan Du(杜世萱)1 |
1 Institute of Physics & University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2 Suzhou Saibao Calibration Technology Co., Ltd., No. 4, Baotong Road, Wuzhong District, Suzhou 215100, China |
|
|
Abstract We investigate the interactions between two symmetric monovacancy defects in graphene grown on Ru (0001) after silicon intercalation by combining first-principles calculations with scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). First-principles calculations based on free-standing graphene show that the interaction is weak and no scattering pattern is observed when the two vacancies are located in the same sublattice of graphene, no matter how close they are, except that they are next to each other. For the two vacancies in different sublattices of graphene, the interaction strongly influences the scattering and new patterns' emerge, which are determined by the distance between two vacancies. Further experiments on silicon intercalated graphene epitaxially grown on Ru (0001) shows that the experiment results are consistent with the simulated STM images based on free-standing graphene, suggesting that a single layer of silicon is good enough to decouple the strong interaction between graphene and the Ru (0001) substrate.
|
Received: 24 January 2019
Revised: 03 February 2019
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
68.35.Dv
|
(Composition, segregation; defects and impurities)
|
|
73.22.Pr
|
(Electronic structure of graphene)
|
|
68.37.Ef
|
(Scanning tunneling microscopy (including chemistry induced with STM))
|
|
71.15.-m
|
(Methods of electronic structure calculations)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Shi-Xuan Du
E-mail: sxdu@iphy.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Wen-Yan Xu(徐文焱), Li-Zhi Zhang(张礼智), Li Huang(黄立), Yan-De Que(阙炎德), Ye-Liang Wang(王业亮), Xiao Lin(林晓), Shi-Xuan Du(杜世萱) Interaction of two symmetric monovacancy defects in graphene 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 046801
|
[1] |
Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V Grigorieva I V and Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 666
|
[2] |
Castro Neto A H, Guinea F, Peres N M R, Novoselov K S and Geim A K 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 109
|
[3] |
Kim K S, Zhao Y, Jang H, Lee S Y, Kim J M, Kim K S, Ahn J H, Kim P, Choi J Y and Hong B H 2009 Nature 457 706
|
[4] |
Balandin A A, Ghosh S, Bao W, Calizo I, Teweldebrhan D, Miao F and Lau C N 2008 Nano Lett. 8 902
|
[5] |
Lee C, Wei X, Kysar J W and Hone J 2008 Science 321 385
|
[6] |
Du X, Skachko I, Barker A and Andrei E Y 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 491
|
[7] |
Huang L, Xu W Y, Que Y D, Pan Y, Gao M, Pan L D, Guo H M, Wang Y L, Du S X and Gao H J 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 088102
|
[8] |
Huang L T, Chen Z, Wang Y X and Lu Y L 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 103103
|
[9] |
Li S and Lv Z T 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 036303
|
[10] |
Yang Y L and Lu Y 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 106501
|
[11] |
Banhart F, Kotakoski J and Krasheninnikov A V 2011 ACS Nano 5 26
|
[12] |
Meyer J C Kisielowski C, Erni R, Rossell M D, Crommie M F and Zettl A 2008 Nano Lett. 8 3582
|
[13] |
Tan Y W, Zhang Y, Bolotin K, Zhao Y, Adam S, Hwang E H, Das Sarma S, Stormer H L and Kim P 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 246803
|
[14] |
Ni Z H, Ponomarenko L A, Nair R R, Yang R, Anissimova S, Grigorieva I V, Schedin F, Blake P, Shen Z X, Hill E H, Novoselov K S and Geim A K 2010 Nano Lett. 10 3868
|
[15] |
Ugeda M M, Brihuega I, Guinea F and Go'mez-Rodr'guez J M 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 096804
|
[16] |
Zhang Y, Li S Y, Huang H Q, Li W T, Qiao J B, Wang W X, Yin L J, Bai K K, Duan W H and He L 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 116801
|
[17] |
Robertson W, Barbara Montanari, Kuang He, Allen S, Yimin Wu, Harrison M, Kirkl I and Warner H 2013 ACS Nano 7 4495
|
[18] |
Zhiming Shi and Udo Schwingenschlögl 2017 JPCC 121 2459
|
[19] |
Vanderbilt D 1990 Phys. Rev. B 41 7892
|
[20] |
Kresse G and Furthmuller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169
|
[21] |
Perdew J P, Burke K and Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865
|
[22] |
Pan Y, Shi D X and Gao H J 2007 Chin. Phys. B 16 3151
|
[23] |
Pan Y, Zhang H, Shi D, Sun J, Du S, Liu F and Gao H J 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 2777
|
[24] |
Mao J, Huang L, Pan Y, Gao M, He J, Zhou H, Guo H, Tian Y, Zou Q, Zhang L, Zhang H, Wang Y, Du S, Zhou X, Castro Neto A H and Gao H J 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 093101
|
[25] |
Li G, Zhang L, Xu W, Pan J, Song S, Zhang Y, Zhou H, Wang Y, Bao L, Zhang Y, Du S, Ouyang M, Pantelides S and Gao H J 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 1804650
|
[26] |
Mallet P, Varchon F, Naud C, Magaud L, Berger C and Veuillen J Y 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 041403
|
[27] |
Kelly K F, Sarkar D, Hale G D, Oldenburg S J and Halas N J 1996 Science 273 1371
|
[28] |
Ugeda M M, Brihuega I, Hiebel F, Mallet P, Veuillen J Y, Go'mez-Rodr'guez J M and Yndur'ain F 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 121402
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|