|
|
|
Evolutionary analysis of multi-player snowdrift game with cost sharing under Aspiration-Fermi hybrid rule |
| Bolin Yanga(杨柏林)2 and Guanghui Yang(杨光惠)1,2,† |
1 School of Mathematics and Statistics, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China;
2 Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Games Decision-Making and Control Systems, Guiyang 550025, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This paper firstly constructs a multi-player snowdrift game with all players' cost sharing once the snowdrift is removed for a fairness. Secondly, an Aspiration-Fermi hybrid rule is proposed to derive an extended average abundance function via Markov chain evolutionary processes. Besides, extensive numerical simulations well verify theoretical results. Our findings show that both cost sharing and the Aspiration-Fermi hybrid rule significantly promote the cooperation by enhancing the average abundance in multi-person snowdrift game. By comparison with the existing woks, our proposed model and hybrid strategy-update rule provide novel insights into the evolution of cooperation in multi-person games.
|
Received: 29 May 2025
Revised: 16 July 2025
Accepted manuscript online: 23 July 2025
|
|
PACS:
|
02.50.Le
|
(Decision theory and game theory)
|
| |
02.50.Ga
|
(Markov processes)
|
| |
89.75.-k
|
(Complex systems)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Guanghui Yang
E-mail: ghuiyang@126.com
|
Cite this article:
Bolin Yanga(杨柏林) and Guanghui Yang(杨光惠) Evolutionary analysis of multi-player snowdrift game with cost sharing under Aspiration-Fermi hybrid rule 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 030203
|
[1] Milinski M 1987 Nature 325 433
[2] Sinervo B and Clobert J 2003 Science 300 1949
[3] Bshary R and Grutter A S 2006 Nature 441 975
[4] Tilman A R, Plotkin J B and Akçay E 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 915
[5] Wang C, Feng T J, Li C, et al. 2023 Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 168 113141
[6] Fehr E and Fischbacher U 2003 Nature 425 785
[7] Nowak M A 2006 Science 314 1560
[8] Rand D G and Nowak M A 2013 Trends Cogn. Sci. 17 413
[9] Apicella C L and Silk J B 2019 Curr. Biol. 29 R447
[10] Maynard Smith J 1982 Evolution and the Theory of Games (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
[11] Weibull J W 1995 Evolutionary Game Theory (Cambridge: MIT Press)
[12] Hofbauer J and Sigmund K 1998 Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
[13] Nowak M A 2006 Evolutionary Dynamics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)
[14] Li A, Liu Y Y, Wang L, et al. 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 2259
[15] Pi J X, Yang H and Yang G H 2022 Physica A 592 126839
[16] Zhang Q C X, Shu L and Jiang B C 2023 Appl. Math. Comput. 446 127875
[17] Tang W, Wang C, Pi J X, et al. 2024 New J. Phys. 26 013017
[18] Wang C, Tang W and Pi J X 2024 Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 179 114409
[19] Xu Y, Feng M L, Xia C Y, et al. 2022 Physica A 604 127698
[20] Xu Y,Wang J, Xia C Y, et al. 2023 Science China Information Sciences 66 222208
[21] Zheng D F, Yin H P, et al. 2007 Europhys. Lett. 80 18002
[22] Souza M O, Pacheco J M and Santos F C 2009 J. Theor. Biol. 260 581
[23] Xu M, Zheng D F, Xu C, et al. 2015 Physica A 424 322
[24] Sui X, Cong R, Li K and Wang L 2015 Phys. Lett. A 379 2922
[25] Zheng Y L and Zhang W G 2016 J. Syst. Sci. Math. Sci. 36 1933 (in Chinese)
[26] Fang X and Chen X J 2021 Eur. Phys. J. B 94 176
[27] Li M Y, Kang H W, Sun X P, et al. 2022 Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 164 112747
[28] Pi J X, Yang G H, Yang H, et al. 2022 Physica A 604 127927
[29] Ma X J, Quan J and Wang X J 2024 Nonlinear Dyn. 112 709
[30] Pi J X, Yang G H, Wang C, et al. 2024 Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 180 114593
[31] Ghang W and Nowak M A 2014 J. Theor. Biol. 360 129
[32] Wang X J, Gu C L, Quan J, et al. 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 020203
[33] Tkadlec J, Pavlogiannis A, Nowak M A, et al. 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 4009
[34] Gu C L,Wang X J, Ding R, et al. 2022 Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 164 112658
[35] Wang X J and Xia K 2019 Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 39 1128 (in Chinese)
[36] Xia K 2021 Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 142 110490
[37] Xia K 2021 Appl. Math. Comput. 392 125733
[38] Kroumi D and Lessard S 2022 J. Math. Biol. 85 27
[39] Debove S, Baumard N and André J B 2016 Evol. Hum. Behav. 37 245
[40] Nowak M A, Sasaki A, Taylor C, et al. 2004 Nature 428 646
[41] Lieberman E, Hauert C and Nowak M A 2005 Nature 433 312
[42] Liu R R, Rong Z H, et al. 2010 EPL 91 20002
[43] Nagashima K and Tanimoto J 2019 Appl. Math. Comput. 361 661
[44] György S and Csaba T 1998 Phys. Rev. E 58 69
[45] Traulsen A, Pacheco J M and Nowak M A 2007 J. Theor. Biol. 246 522
[46] Liu Y, Chen X J, Wang L, et al. 2011 Europhys. Lett. 94 60002
[47] Chen Y S, Yang H X and Guo W Z 2017 Physica A 469 625
[48] Płatkowski T 2015 Appl. Math. Comput. 251 46
[49] Wang X J and Liu J 2018 Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 38 1173 (in Chinese)
[50] Liu X S, He M F, Pan Q H, et al. 2016 Phys. Rev. E 94 012124
[51] Liu X S, He M F, Pan Q H, et al. 2017 Physica A 484 336
[52] Hong L J, Geng Y N, Shi L, et al. 2021 Appl. Math. Comput. 394 125784
[53] Gao H Y,Wang J, Xia C Y, et al. 2021 Appl. Math. Comput. 410 126433
[54] Pan F, Xi B and Wang L 2015 Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 35 1393 (in Chinese) |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
