|
|
|
The impact of honesty and trickery on a Bayesian quantum prisoners' dilemma game |
| Bo-Yang Liu(刘博阳)1, Xin Zhao(赵鑫)2, Hong-Yi Dai(戴宏毅)3,4, Ming Zhang(张明)2, Ying Liao(廖鹰)1, Xiao-Feng Guo(郭晓峰)1, Wei Gao(郜伟)1 |
1 Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450001, China;
2 College of Artificial Intelligence, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China;
3 Department of Physics, College of Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China;
4 Interdisciplinary Center for Quantum Information, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract To explore the influence of quantum information on the common social problem of honesty and trickery, we propose a Bayesian model for the quantum prisoners' dilemma game. In this model, the players' strategy formation is regarded as a negotiation of their move contract based on their types of decision policies, honesty or trickery. Although the implementation of quantum information cannot eliminate tricky players, players in our model can always end up with higher payoffs than in the classical game. For a good proportion of a credibility parameter value, a rational player will take an honest action, which is in remarkable contrast to the observation that players tend to defect in the classical prisoners' dilemma game. This research suggests that honesty will be promoted to enhance cooperation with the assistance of quantum information resources.
|
Received: 22 January 2020
Revised: 07 April 2020
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
PACS:
|
02.50.Le
|
(Decision theory and game theory)
|
| |
03.67.Hk
|
(Quantum communication)
|
| |
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61773399, 61673389, and 61273202) and the Special Funded Project of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2017T100792). |
Corresponding Authors:
Bo-Yang Liu
E-mail: boyangliu2011@hotmail.com
|
Cite this article:
Bo-Yang Liu(刘博阳), Xin Zhao(赵鑫), Hong-Yi Dai(戴宏毅), Ming Zhang(张明), Ying Liao(廖鹰), Xiao-Feng Guo(郭晓峰), Wei Gao(郜伟) The impact of honesty and trickery on a Bayesian quantum prisoners' dilemma game 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 070201
|
| [1] |
Iqbal A and Toor A H 2007 Phys. Lett. A 362 132
|
| [2] |
Flitney A P and Greentree A D 2007 Phys. Lett. A 362 132
|
| [3] |
Du J F, Li H, Xu X D, Zhou X Y and Han R D 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 36 6551
|
| [4] |
Li S B 2011 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44 295302
|
| [5] |
Khan S and Khan M K 2013 Quantum Inf. Process. 12 1351
|
| [6] |
Deng X, Deng Y, Liu Q, Chang S and Wang Z 2016 Eur. Phys. J. B 89 162
|
| [7] |
Dai J and Deng Y 2020 Soft Computing 24 10287
|
| [8] |
Deng W and Deng Y 2018 Physica A 512 693
|
| [9] |
Eisert J, Wilkens M and Lewenstein M 2000 Phys. Rev. A 62 052317
|
| [10] |
Melo-Luna C A, Susa C E, Ducuara A F, Barreiro A and Reina J H 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 44730
|
| [11] |
Frackiewicz P 2016 Quantum Inf. Process. 15 121
|
| [12] |
Lei Z Z, Liu B Y, Yi Y, Dai H Y and Zhang M 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 030202
|
| [13] |
Flitney A P and Hollenberg L C L 2007 Phys. Lett. A 363 381
|
| [14] |
Huang Z and Situ H 2017 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56 1605
|
| [15] |
Bolonek-Lason K and Kosinski P 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 4413
|
| [16] |
Liu B Y, Dai H Y and Zhang M 2017 Quantum Inf. Process. 16 290
|
| [17] |
Marinatto L and Weber T 2000 Phys. Lett. A 277 183
|
| [18] |
Nawaz A and Toor A H 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 37 11457
|
| [19] |
Frackiewicz P 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 1809
|
| [20] |
Deng X, Deng Y, Liu Q, Shi L and Wang Z 2016 Europhys. Lett. 114 50012
|
| [21] |
Samadi A H, Montakhab A, Marzban H and Owjimehr S 2018 Physica A 489 94
|
| [22] |
Cheon T and Iqbal A 2008 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77 024801
|
| [23] |
Brunner N and Linden N 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2057
|
| [24] |
Situ H 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 1827
|
| [25] |
Roy A, Mukherjee A, Guha T, Ghosh S, Bhattacharya S S and Banik M 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 032120
|
| [26] |
Situ H 2016 Quantum Inf. Process. 15 137
|
| [27] |
Rai A and Paul G 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 042340
|
| [28] |
Yang Y and Zheng Z J 2018 Quantum Inf. Process. 17 1570
|
| [29] |
Gao X and Deng Y 2020 Int. J. Intell. Syst. 35 267
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
