CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
High-throughput screening and evaluation of double-linker metal-organic frameworks for CO2/H2 adsorption and separation |
Ji-Long Huang(黄纪龙)1, Xiu-Ying Liu(刘秀英)1,2,†, Hao Chen(陈浩)1, Xiao-Dong Li(李晓东)1,2, and Jing-Xin Yu(于景新)1,2 |
1 School of Physics, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China; 2 R&D Center for Advanced Energy Materials, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China |
|
|
Abstract The capture of CO$_{2}$ from CO$_{2}$/H$_{2}$ gas mixtures in syngas is a crucial issue for hydrogen production from steam methane reforming in industry, as the presence of CO$_{2}$ directly affects the purity of H$_{2}$. A combination of a high-throughput screening method and grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation was utilized to evaluate and screen 1725 metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) in detail as a means of determining their adsorption performance for CO$_{2}$/H$_{2}$ gas mixtures. The adsorption and separation performance of double-linker MOFs was comprehensively evaluated using eight evaluation indicators, namely, the largest cavity diameter, accessible surface area, pore occupied accessible volume, porosity, adsorption selectivity, working capacity, adsorbent performance score and percent regeneration. Six optimal performance frameworks were screened to further study their single-component adsorption and binary competitive adsorption of CO$_{2}$/H$_{2}$ respectively. The CO$_{2}$ adsorption selectivity at different CO$_{2}$/H$_{2}$ feed ratios was also evaluated, which indicated their excellent adsorption and separation performance. The microscopic adsorption mechanisms for CO$_{2}$ and H$_{2}$ at the molecular level were investigated by analyzing the radial distribution function and density distribution. This study may provide directional guidance and reference for subsequent experiments on the adsorption and separation of CO$_{2}$/H$_{2}$.
|
Received: 08 September 2024
Revised: 05 November 2024
Accepted manuscript online: 14 November 2024
|
PACS:
|
73.22.-f
|
(Electronic structure of nanoscale materials and related systems)
|
|
36.40.-c
|
(Atomic and molecular clusters)
|
|
71.15.Mb
|
(Density functional theory, local density approximation, gradient and other corrections)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11304079, 11404094, and 11504088) and Science and Technology Research Project of Henan Science and Technology Department (Grant No. 182102410076). |
Corresponding Authors:
Xiu-Ying Liu
E-mail: liuxiuyingzx@126.com
|
Cite this article:
Ji-Long Huang(黄纪龙), Xiu-Ying Liu(刘秀英), Hao Chen(陈浩), Xiao-Dong Li(李晓东), and Jing-Xin Yu(于景新) High-throughput screening and evaluation of double-linker metal-organic frameworks for CO2/H2 adsorption and separation 2025 Chin. Phys. B 34 027302
|
[1] Zhang M M, Zhang F, Wu Q, Huang X, Yan W, Zhao C M, Chen W, Yang Z H, Wang Y H and Wu T T 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 066803 [2] Hwang J J 2013 Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 19 220 [3] Pei P, Wang M, Chen D, Ren P and Zhang L 2020 Prog. Nat. Sci.: Mater. Int. 30 751 [4] Hori T, Ma Q, Kobayashi K, Nagao M, Teranishi S and Hibino T 2019 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 44 2454 [5] Majeed H and Svendsen H F 2018 Chem. Eng. J. (Amsterdam, Neth.) 333 636 [6] Majeed H and Svendsen H F 2018 Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 74 282 [7] Meng F, Meng Y, Ju T, Han S, Lin L and Jiang J 2022 Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 168 112902 [8] Dutta A, Pan Y, Liu J Q and Kumar A 2021 Coord. Chem. Rev. 445 214074 [9] Liu Q, Yu J and Hu J 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 017204 [10] Li Y Z,Wang G D, Ma L N, Hou L,Wang Y Y and Zhu Z H 2021 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 4102 [11] Gu Y M, Yuan Y Y, Qadir S, Yuan Z S, Zhao S S, Sun T J, Liu X W and Wang S D 2022 Chem. Eng. J. 433 134447 [12] Singh A and Kayal S 2022 Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. Surf. 58 478 [13] Soares E d A, Barreto Jr A G and Tavares FW2023 Fluid Phase Equilib. 574 113887 [14] Anastasiou I, Van Velthoven N, Tomarelli E, Lombi A, Lanari D, Liu P, Bals S, De Vos D E and Vaccaro L 2020 ChemSusChem 13 2786 [15] Dou Y, Yang L, Qin L, Dong Y, Zhou Z and Zhang D 2021 J. Solid State Chem. 293 121820 [16] Wu L, Zhang X F, Li Z Q and Wu F 2016 Inorg. Chem. Commun. 74 22 [17] Liu W, Xie J, Zhang L, Silver M A and Wang S 2018 Dalton Trans. 47 649 [18] Hosseinzadeh B and Rodriguez-Mendez M L 2023 Chemosensors 11 357 [19] Feng A,Wang Y, Ding J, Xu R and Li X 2021 Curr. Drug Deliv. 18 297 [20] Li C, Chen C, Wei Y, Tan M, Zhai S, Zhao J, Wang L and Dai T 2021 Drug Delivery 28 2594 [21] Zong Z, Tian G,Wang J, Fan C, Yang F and Guo F 2022 Pharmaceutics 14 2790 [22] Mehtab T, Yasin G, Arif M, Shakeel M, Korai R M, Nadeem M, Muhammad N and Lu X 2019 J. Energy Storage 21 632 [23] ZhaoW, Zeng Y, Zhao Y andWu X 2023 J. Energy Storage 62 106934 [24] Zhao G, Xie J, Zhou K, Xing B, Wang X, Tian F, He X and Zhang L 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 037104 [25] Qiao Z, Zhang K and Jiang J 2016 J. Mater. Chem. A 4 2105 [26] Avci G, Velioglu S and Keskin S 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 33693 [27] Li M, Cai W, Wang C and Wu X 2022 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24 18764 [28] Ryu D and Kim J 2023 J. Phys. Chem. C 127 10384 [29] Willems T F, Rycroft C H, Kazi M, Meza J C and Haranczyk M 2012 Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 149 134 [30] Mayo S L, Olafson B D and Goddard W A 1990 J. Phys. Chem. 94 8897 [31] Rappe A K, Casewit C J, Colwell K S, Goddard W A, III and Skiff W M 1992 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 10024 [32] Zhou F, Chen Y, Zhang Z, Gu Z, Sun Y, Tong M, Yang Q, DongW, Pan Y, Qiao Z and Zhong C 2024 AIChE J. 70 e18455 [33] Xu H, Mguni L L, Shan Y, Jewell L L, Hildebrandt D, Yao Y and Liu X 2025 Sep. Purif. Technol. 354 128927 [34] Dokur D and Keskin S 2018 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57 2298 [35] Morales A D C, Economou I G, Peters C J and Siepmann J I 2013 Mol. Simul. 39 1135 [36] Jones J E 1924 Proc. R. Soc. London A 106 441 [37] Yuan J P, Liu X Y, Li X D and Yu J X 2020 Mater. Today Commun. 26 101987 [38] Liu X Y, He J, Yu J X, Li Z X and Fan Z Q 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 067303 [39] Vlugt T, García-Pérez E, Dubbeldam D, Ban S and Calero S 2008 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4 1107 [40] Jiang Y C, Li G X, Yu G F, JuanW, Huang S L and Xu G L 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 118105 [41] Liu X, Liu J, Mao S, Xu H,Wang Y, TaoWand Li Z 2024 Fluid Phase Equilib. 581 114073 [42] Dubbeldam D, Torres-Knoop A and Walton K S 2013 Mol. Simul. 39 1253 [43] Dubbeldam D, Calero S, Ellis D E and Snurr R Q 2016 Mol. Simul. 42 81 [44] Yuan J P, Liu X Y, Li X D and Yu J X 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 156801 (in Chinese) [45] Yuan J P, Liu X Y, Wang H and Li X D 2023 Comput. Mater. Sci. 216 111872 [46] Liu X Y, Chen H, Yuan J P, Huang J l, Dong L X and Xin Y J 2023 Z. Naturforsch. A: Phys. Sci. 78 863 [47] Mert H, Deniz C U and Baykasoglu C 2023 J. Mol. Model. 29 315 [48] Altundal O F, Altintas C and Keskin S 2020 J. Mater. Chem. A 8 14609 [49] Cen X, Sun Y, Yu C, Geng C, Gu Z, Ao D, Zhang Z, Qiao Z and Zhong C 2024 Sep. Purif. Technol. 334 125995 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|