|
|
Electric field intensity measurement by using doublet electromagnetically induced transparency of cold Rb Rydberg atoms |
Ting Gong(宫廷)1,2,3, Shuai Shi(师帅)1, Zhonghua Ji(姬中华)2,3,†, Guqing Guo(郭古青)1, Xiaocong Sun(孙小聪)1, Yali Tian(田亚莉)1, Xuanbing Qiu(邱选兵)1, Chuanliang Li(李传亮)1, Yanting Zhao(赵延霆)2,3, and Suotang Jia(贾锁堂)2,3 |
1 Shanxi Engineering Research Center of Precision Measurement and Online Detection Equipment, School of Applied Science, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; 2 State Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Quantum Optics Devices, Institute of Laser Spectroscopy, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China; 3 Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China |
|
|
Abstract We demonstrate a simple method to measure electric field intensity by using doublet electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) spectra of cold Rb Rydberg atoms, where the frequency of the coupling laser does not need to be locked. Based on the Stark splitting of the Rb Rydberg state, 10D3/2, under electric fields and the corresponding calculated polarizabilities, the real electric field intensity is calculated using the difference in radio-frequency diffraction between two acousto-optic modulators, which acts as a frequency criterion that allows us to measure the electrical field without locking the coupling laser. The value measured by this simple method shows a good agreement with our previous work [Opt. Express 29 1558 (2021)] where the frequency of the coupling laser needs to be locked with an additional EIT spectrum based on atom vapor and a proportional-integral-differential feedback circuit. Our presented method can also be extended to the measurement of electric field based on hot Rydberg atom vapor, which has application in industry.
|
Received: 19 June 2023
Revised: 05 August 2023
Accepted manuscript online: 17 August 2023
|
PACS:
|
32.60.+i
|
(Zeeman and Stark effects)
|
|
32.10.Dk
|
(Electric and magnetic moments, polarizabilities)
|
|
32.80.Ee
|
(Rydberg states)
|
|
42.50.Gy
|
(Effects of atomic coherence on propagation, absorption, and Amplification of light; electromagnetically induced transparency and Absorption)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12034012, 12074231, 12274272, and 61827824), Science and technology innovation plan of colleges and universities in Shanxi Province (Grant No. 2021L313), Science and Technology Project of State Grid (Grant No. 5700-202127198A-0-0-00), Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province (Grant No. 202203021222204), and Taiyuan University of Science and Technology Scientific Research Initial Funding (Grant Nos. 20222008 and 20222132). |
Corresponding Authors:
Zhonghua Ji
E-mail: jzh@sxu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Ting Gong(宫廷), Shuai Shi(师帅), Zhonghua Ji(姬中华), Guqing Guo(郭古青), Xiaocong Sun(孙小聪), Yali Tian(田亚莉), Xuanbing Qiu(邱选兵), Chuanliang Li(李传亮), Yanting Zhao(赵延霆), and Suotang Jia(贾锁堂) Electric field intensity measurement by using doublet electromagnetically induced transparency of cold Rb Rydberg atoms 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 103202
|
[1] Julienne P S 2003 Nature 424 24 [2] Ketterle W 2002 Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 1131 [3] Lepers M, Li H, Wyart J F, Quéméner G and Dulieu O 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 063201 [4] DeMille D 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 067901 [5] Matsuda K, De Marco L, Li J R, Tobias W G, Valtolina G, Quéméner G and Ye J 2020 Science 370 1324 [6] DeMille D, Doyle J M and Sushkov A O 2017 Science 357 990 [7] Cronin A D, Schmiedmayer J and Pritchard D E 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 1051 [8] Savukov I M, Seltzer S J, Romalis M V and Sauer K L 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 063004 [9] Acosta V M, Jensen K, Santori C, Budker D and Beausoleil R G 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 213605 [10] Frey M T, Ling X, Lindsay B G, Smith K A and Dunning F B 1993 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64 3649 [11] Osterwalder A and Merkt F 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 1831 [12] Thiele T, Deiglmayr J, Stammeier M, Agner J A, Schmutz H, Merkt F and Wallraff A 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 063425 [13] Barredo D, Kübler H, Daschner R, Löw R and Pfau T 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 123002 [14] Sedlacek J A, Schwettmann A, Kübler H, Löw R, Pfau T and Shaffer J P 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 819 [15] Grabowski A, Heidemann R, Löw R, Stuhler J and Pfau T 2006 Fortschr. Phys. 54 765 [16] Gong T, Ji Z H, Du J Q, Zhao Y T, Xiao L T and Jia S T 2021 Opt. Express 29 1558 [17] Qin X T, Jiang Y, Ma W X, Ji Z H, Peng W X and Zhao Y T 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 064216 [18] Xu Z S, Wang H M, Cai M H, You S H and Liu H P 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 123201 [19] Zhang H, Wang L M, Chen J, Bao S X, Zhang L J, Zhao J M and Jia S T 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 033835 [20] Zimmerman M L, Littman M G, Kash M M and Kleppner D 1979 Phys. Rev. A 20 2251 [21] Angel J R P and Sandars P G H 1968 Proc. R. Soc. A. 305 125 [22] ibalić N, Pritchard J, Adams C and Weatherill K 2017 Comput. Phys. Commun. 220 319 [23] Jiao Y C, Li J KK, Wang L M, Zhang H, Zhang L J, Zhao J M and Jia S T 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 053201 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|