|
|
|
Efficient quantum private comparison protocol utilizing single photons and rotational encryption |
| Tian-Yi Kou(寇天翊)1, Bi-Chen Che(车碧琛)1, Zhao Dou(窦钊)1,†, Xiu-Bo Chen(陈秀波)1, Yu-Ping Lai(赖裕平)2, and Jian Li(李剑)2 |
1 Information Security Center, State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China;
2 Information Security Center, School of Cyberspace Security, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As a branch of quantum secure multiparty computation, quantum private comparison is applied frequently in many fields, such as secret elections, private voting, and identification. A quantum private comparison protocol with higher efficiency and easier implementation is proposed in this paper. The private secrets are encoded as single polarized photons and then encrypted with a homomorphic rotational encryption method. Relying on this method and the circular transmission mode, we implement the multiplexing of photons, raising the efficiency of our protocol to 100%. Our protocol is easy to realize since only single photons, unitary operation, and single-particle measurement are introduced. Meanwhile, the analysis shows that our protocol is also correct and secure.
|
Received: 07 February 2022
Revised: 07 April 2022
Accepted manuscript online: 11 April 2022
|
|
PACS:
|
03.67.Dd
|
(Quantum cryptography and communication security)
|
| |
03.67.Hk
|
(Quantum communication)
|
| |
03.67.Ac
|
(Quantum algorithms, protocols, and simulations)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2020YFB1805405), the 111 Project (Grant No. B21049), the Foundation of Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Public Big Data (Grant No. 2019BDKFJJ014), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2020RC38). |
Corresponding Authors:
Zhao Dou
E-mail: dou@bupt.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Tian-Yi Kou(寇天翊), Bi-Chen Che(车碧琛), Zhao Dou(窦钊), Xiu-Bo Chen(陈秀波), Yu-Ping Lai(赖裕平), and Jian Li(李剑) Efficient quantum private comparison protocol utilizing single photons and rotational encryption 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 060307
|
[1] Yao A C 1982 Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, November 3-5, 1982, Chicago, USA, p. 160
[2] Jakobsson M and Yung M 1996 Annual International Cryptology Conference, August 18-22, 1996, Santa Barbara, USA, p. 186
[3] Boudot F, Schoenmakers B and Traore J 2001 Discrete Appl. Math. 111 23
[4] Lo H K 1997 Phys. Rev. A 56 1154
[5] Yang J, Wang C and Zhang R 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 110306
[6] Gu B, Huang Y G, Fang X and Zhang C Y 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 100309
[7] Chang Y, Zhang S B, Yan L L and Han G H 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 050307
[8] Zhao X L, Li J L, Niu P H, Ma H Y and Ruan D 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 030302
[9] Wang C and Zhang Y 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 3238
[10] Zhu Z C, Zhang Y Q and Fu A M 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 040306
[11] Zhang Z R, Liu W T and Li C Z 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 050309
[12] Du Y T and Bao W S 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 080304
[13] Tan Y G and Liu Q 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 090303
[14] Liu C Q, Zhu C H, Wang L H, Zhang L X and Pei C X 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 100301
[15] Li J J, Wang Y, Li H W and Bao W S 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 030303
[16] He Y Q, Mao Y, Zhong H, Huang D and Guo Y 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 050309
[17] Li X, Yuan H W, Zhang C M and Wang Q 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 070303
[18] Yang Y G and Wen Q Y 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 055305
[19] Chen X B, Xu G, Niu X X, Wen Q Y and Yang Y X 2010 Opt. Commun. 283 1561
[20] Tseng H Y, Lin J and Hwang T 2012 Quantum Inf. Process. 11 373
[21] Jia H Y, Wen Q Y, Li Y B and Gao F 2012 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 51 1187
[22] Chen X B, Dou Z, Xu G, Wang C and Yang Y X 2014 Quantum Inf. Process. 13 85
[23] Shi R H, Mu Y, Zhong H, Cui J and Zhang S 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 19655
[24] Peng Z W, Shi R H, Zhong H, Cui J and Zhang S 2017 Quantum Inf. Process. 16 316
[25] Xu Q D, Chen H Y, Gong L H and Zhou N R 2020 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 59 1798
[26] Chou W H, Hwang T and Gu J 2016 arXiv: 1607.07961 [cs.CR]
[27] Zhou N R, Xu Q D, Du N S and Gong L H 2021 Quantum Inf. Process. 20 124
[28] Wang B, Liu S Q and Gong L H 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 010302
[29] Shannon K, Towe E and Tonguz O K 2020 arXiv: 2003.07907 [cs.CR]
[30] Wen Q Y, Qin S J and Gao F 2014 J. Cryptol. 1 200 (in Chinese)
[31] Yang Y G, Xia J, Jia X, Shi L and Zhang H 2012 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 10 1250065
[32] Liu B, Gao F, Jia H Y, Huang W, Zhang W W and Wen Q Y 2013 Quantum Inf. Process. 12 887
[33] Li Y B, Ma Y J, Xu S W, Huang W and Zhang Y S 2014 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53 3191
[34] Liu B, Xiao D, Huang W, Jia H Y and Song T T 2017 Quantum Inf. Process. 16 180
[35] Goswami P S, Chakraborty T and Chattopadhyay A 2021 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies, September 15-17, 2021, Erode, The Republic of India, p. 1
[36] Xin X J, Ding L, Li C Y, Sang Y X, Yang Q L and Li F G 2022 Quantum Inf. Process. 21 33
[37] Zhang J L, Huang Z J, Li X, Wu M Q, Wang X Y and Dong Y M 2021 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 60 2930
[38] Song X L, Wen A J and Gou R 2019 IEEE Access 7 142507
[39] Wu W Q, Zhou G L, Zhao Y X and Zhang H G 2020 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 59 1866
[40] Ye T Y and Ji Z X 2017 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56 1517
[41] Ye T Y 2017 Commun. Theor. Phys. 67 147
[42] Zha X W, Yu X Y, Cao Y and Wang S K 2018 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57 3874
[43] Pan H M 2017 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56 3340
[44] Ji Z X, Fan P R, Zhang H G and Wang H Z 2020 Opt. Commun. 459 124911
[45] Ye C Q, Li J, Chen X B and Tian Y 2021 Quantum Inf. Process. 20 262
[46] Jones R C 1941 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 31 488
[47] Zi W, Guo F Z, Luo Y, Cao S H and Wen Q Y 2013 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 3212
[48] Gao F, Qin S J, Wen Q Y and Zhu F C 2007 Quantum Inf. Comput. 7 329
[49] Yan L L, Zhang S B, Chang Y, Sheng Z W and Sun Y H 2019 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 58 3852
[50] Sun Z W, Yu J P, Wang P, Xu L L and Wu C H 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 2125 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
