ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Second harmonic magnetoacoustic responses of magnetic nanoparticles in magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction |
Gepu Guo(郭各朴)1, Ya Gao(高雅)1, Yuzhi Li(李禹志)1, Qingyu Ma(马青玉)1, Juan Tu(屠娟)2, Dong Zhang(章东)2 |
1 School of Physics and Technology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China; 2 Institute of Acoustics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China |
|
|
Abstract Due to the unique magnetic, mechanical and thermal properties, magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have comprehensive applications as the contrast and therapeutic agents in biomedical imaging and magnetic hyperthermia. The linear and nonlinear magnetoacoustic responses determined by the magnetic properties of MNPs have attracted more and more attention in biomedical engineering. By considering the relaxation time of MNPs, we derive the formulae of second harmonic magnetoacoustic responses (2H-MARs) for a cylindrical MNP solution model based on the mechanical oscillations of MNPs in magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction (MAT-MI). It is proved that only the second harmonic magnetoacoustic oscillations can be generated by MNPs under an alternating magnetic excitation. The acoustic pressure of the 2H-MAR is proportional to the square of the magnetic field intensity and exhibits a linear increase with the concentration of MNPs. Numerical simulations of the 2H-MAR are confirmed by the experimental measurements for various magnetic field intensities and solution concentrations using a laser vibrometer. The favorable results demonstrate the feasibility of the harmonic measurements without the fundamental interference of the electromagnetic excitation, and suggest a new harmonic imaging strategy of MAT-MI for MNPs with enhanced spatial resolution and improved signal-to-noise ratio in biomedical applications.
|
Received: 17 November 2019
Revised: 14 December 2019
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
43.80.Ev
|
(Acoustical measurement methods in biological systems and media)
|
|
72.55.+s
|
(Magnetoacoustic effects)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11934009, 11974187, and 11604156). |
Corresponding Authors:
Qingyu Ma
E-mail: maqingyu@njnu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Gepu Guo(郭各朴), Ya Gao(高雅), Yuzhi Li(李禹志), Qingyu Ma(马青玉), Juan Tu(屠娟), Dong Zhang(章东) Second harmonic magnetoacoustic responses of magnetic nanoparticles in magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 034302
|
[1] |
Weissleder R, Nahrendorf M and Pittet M J 2014 Nat. Mater. 13 125
|
[2] |
Cabrera D, Coene A, Leliaert J, Artés-Ibáñez E J, Dupré L, Telling N D and Teran F J 2018 ACS Nano 12 2741
|
[3] |
Li Q, Kartikowati C W, Horie S, Ogi T, Iwaki T and Okuyama K 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 9894
|
[4] |
Chi Q, Ma T, Dong J, Cui Y, Zhang Y, Zhang C, Xu S, Wang X and Lei Q 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 3072
|
[5] |
Oh J, Feldman M D, Kim J, Condit C, Emelianov S and Milner T E 2006 Nanotechnology 17 4183
|
[6] |
Usov N A and Liubimov B Y 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 112 023901
|
[7] |
Chaughule R S, Purushotham S and Ramanujan R V 2012 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. A: Phys. Sci. 82 257
|
[8] |
Steinberg I, Ben-David M and Gannot I 2012 Nanomed.: NBM 8 569
|
[9] |
Kalambur V S, Han B, Hammer B E, Shield T W and Bischof J C 2005 Nanotechnology 16 1221
|
[10] |
Xia R, Li X and He B 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 083903
|
[11] |
Mariappan L, Li X and He B 2011 IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58 713
|
[12] |
Sun X, Zhang F, Ma Q, Tu J and Zhang D 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 024105
|
[13] |
Yu Z, Dai S, Ma Q, Guo G, Tu J and Zhang D 2018 IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 65 2512
|
[14] |
Li X, Yu K and He B 2016 Phys. Med. Biol. 61 R249
|
[15] |
Hu G and He B 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 013704
|
[16] |
Yan X, Zhang Y and Liu G 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 104302
|
[17] |
Mariappan L, Shao Q, Jiang C, Yu K, Ashkenazi S, Bischof J C and He B 2016 Nanomed.: NBM 12 689
|
[18] |
Laurent S, Dutz S, Häfeli U O and Mahmoudi M 2011 Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 166 8
|
[19] |
Derfus A M, von Maltzahn G, Harris T J, Duza T, Vecchio K S, Ruoslahti E and Bhatia S N 2007 Adv. Mater. 19 3932
|
[20] |
Stanley S A, Gagner J E, Damanpour S, Yoshida M, Dordick J S and Friedman J M 2012 Science 336 604
|
[21] |
Feng X, Gao F and Zheng Y 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 083704
|
[22] |
Piao D, Towner R A, Smith N and Chen W R 2013 Med. Phys. 40 063301
|
[23] |
Kellnberger S, Rosenthal A, Myklatun A, Westmeyer G G, Sergiadis G and Ntziachristos V 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 108103
|
[24] |
Carrey J, Connord V and Respaud M 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 232404
|
[25] |
Cao Q, Han X and Li L 2012 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 465001
|
[26] |
Xiang Q, Zhong J, Zhou M, Cesar P and Liu W 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 07B317
|
[27] |
Mamiya H and Jeyadevan B 2011 Sci. Rep. 1 157
|
[28] |
Zhou Y, Wang J, Sun X, Ma Q and Zhang D 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 119 094903
|
[29] |
Guo G, Ding H, Dai S and Ma Q 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 084301
|
[30] |
Tao C, Guo G, Ma Q, Tu J, Dong Z and Hu J 2017 J. Appl. Phys. 122 014901
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|