|
|
Energy feedback and synchronous dynamics of Hindmarsh-Rose neuron model with memristor |
K Usha1, P A Subha2 |
1 Department of physics, University of Calicut, Kerala 673635, India;
2 Department of physics, Farook College, University of Calicut, Kerala 673632, India |
|
|
Abstract We analyze the energy aspects of single and coupled Hindmarsh-Rose (HR) neuron models with a quadratic flux controlled memristor. The energy function for HR neuron with memristor has been derived and the dynamics have been analyzed in the presence of various external stimuli. We found that the bursting mode of the system changes with external forcing. The negative feedback in Hamilton energy function effectively stabilizes the chaotic trajectories and controls the phase space. The Lyapunov exponents have been plotted to verify the stabilization of trajectories. The energy aspects during the synchronous dynamics of electrically coupled neurons have been analyzed. As the coupling strength increases, the average energy fluctuates and stabilizes at the point of synchronization. When the neurons are coupled via chemical synapse, the average energy variations show three important regimes:a fluctuating regime corresponding to the desynchronized, a stable region indicating synchronized and a linearly increasing regime corresponding to the amplitude death states have been observed. The synchronization transitions are verified by plotting the transverse Lyapunov exponents. The proposed method has a large number of applications in controlling coupled chaotic systems and in analyzing the energy change during various metabolic processes.
|
Received: 02 October 2018
Revised: 19 November 2018
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
05.45.-a
|
(Nonlinear dynamics and chaos)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
P A Subha
E-mail: pasubha@farookcollege.ac.in
|
Cite this article:
K Usha, P A Subha Energy feedback and synchronous dynamics of Hindmarsh-Rose neuron model with memristor 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 020502
|
[1] |
Torrealdea F J, d'Anjou A, Grana M and Sarasola C 2006 Phys. Rev. E 74 011905
|
[2] |
Torrealdea F J, Sarasola C and d'Anjou A 2009 Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 40 60
|
[3] |
Sira-Ramirez H and Cruz-Hernandez C 2001 Int. J. Bifur. Chaos 11 1381
|
[4] |
Sarasola C, Torrealdea F J, d'Anjou A, Moujahid A and Grana M 2004 Phys. Rev. E 69 011606
|
[5] |
Moujahid A, d'Anjou A, Torrealdea F J and Torrealdea F 2011 Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 44 929
|
[6] |
Moujahid A, d'Anjou A, Torrealdea F J and Torrealdea F 2011 Phys. Rev. E 83 031912
|
[7] |
Gu H 2013 Chaos 23 023126
|
[8] |
Pisarchik A N Jaimes-Reategui R and Garcia-Vellisca M A 2018 Chaos 28 033605
|
[9] |
Xu Y, Ying H, Jia Y, Ma J and Hayat T 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 43452
|
[10] |
Li H, Sun X and Xiao J 2018 Chaos 28 043113
|
[11] |
Wang Y, Ma J, Xu Y, Wu F and Zhou P 2017 Int. J. Bifur. Chaos 27 1750030
|
[12] |
Perc M and Marhl M 2006 New J. Phys. 8 142
|
[13] |
Zambrano S, Marino I P, Seoane J M, Sanjuan M A F, Euzzor S, Geltrude A, Meucci R and Arecchi F T 2010 New J. Phys. 12 053040
|
[14] |
Baltanas J P and Casado J M 2002 Phys. Rev. E 65 041915
|
[15] |
Wang Y, Wang Z D and Wang W 2000 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69 276
|
[16] |
Lindner B, Garcia-Ojalvo J, Neimand A and Schimansky-Geiere L 2004 Phys. Rep. 392 321
|
[17] |
Wu F, Wang C, Xu Y and Ma J 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 28
|
[18] |
Wang G, Shen Y and Yin Q 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 050504
|
[19] |
Ma J, Zhou P, Ahmad B, Ren G and Wang C 2018 PLOS ONE 0191120 1-21
|
[20] |
Ma J, Wu F, Jin W, Zhou P and Hayat T 2017 Chaos 27 053108
|
[21] |
Xu F, Zhang J, Fang T, Huang S and Wang M 2018 Nonlinear Dyn. 92 1395
|
[22] |
Thottil S K and Ignatius R P 2017 Nonlinear Dyn. 87 1879
|
[23] |
Hindmarsh J L and Rose R M 1984 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 221 87
|
[24] |
Rose R M and Hindmarsh J L 1985 Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 225 161
|
[25] |
Storace M, Linaro D and Enno de Lange 2008 Chaos 18 033128
|
[26] |
Usha K, Subha P A and Chitra R N 2018 Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 108 25
|
[27] |
Usha K and Subha P A 2018 Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 29 1850023
|
[28] |
Guo Q, Gu W and Tao Z 2015 Adv. Eng. Res. 1461
|
[29] |
Lv M, Wang C, Ren G, Ma J and Song X 2016 Nonlinear Dyn. 85 1479
|
[30] |
Juang J and Liang Y H 2015 Chaos 24 013110
|
[31] |
Song X L, Jin W Y and Ma J 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 128710
|
[32] |
Djeundam S R D, Yamapi R, Kofane T C and Azizalaoui M A 2013 Chaos 23 033125
|
[33] |
Somers D and Kopell N 1993 Biol. Cybern. 68 393
|
[34] |
Wu K, Aoki C, Elste A, Rogalski-Wilk A A and Siekevitz P 1997 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 13273
|
[35] |
Siekevitz P 2004 Science 306 410
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|