INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Analysis of multiple cell upset sensitivity in bulk CMOS SRAM after neutron irradiation |
Xiaoyu Pan(潘霄宇), Hongxia Guo(郭红霞), Yinhong Luo(罗尹虹), Fengqi Zhang(张凤祁), Lili Ding(丁李利) |
State Key Laboratory of Intense Pulsed Irradiation Simulation and Effect, Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi'an 710024, China |
|
|
Abstract In our previous studies, we have proved that neutron irradiation can decrease the single event latch-up (SEL) sensitivity of CMOS SRAM. And one of the key contributions to the multiple cell upset (MCU) is the parasitic bipolar amplification, it bring us to study the impact of neutron irradiation on the SRAM's MCU sensitivity. After the neutron experiment, we test the devices' function and electrical parameters. Then, we use the heavy ion fluence to examine the changes on the devices' MCU sensitivity pre-and post-neutron-irradiation. Unfortunately, neutron irradiation makes the MCU phenomenon worse. Finally, we use the electric static discharge (ESD) testing technology to deduce the experimental results and find that the changes on the WPM region take the lead rather than the changes on the parasitic bipolar amplification for the 90 nm process.
|
Received: 06 September 2017
Revised: 06 December 2017
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
85.30.De
|
(Semiconductor-device characterization, design, and modeling)
|
|
61.80.-x
|
(Physical radiation effects, radiation damage)
|
|
73.40.Qv
|
(Metal-insulator-semiconductor structures (including semiconductor-to-insulator))
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Hongxia Guo
E-mail: guohxnint@126.com
|
Cite this article:
Xiaoyu Pan(潘霄宇), Hongxia Guo(郭红霞), Yinhong Luo(罗尹虹), Fengqi Zhang(张凤祁), Lili Ding(丁李利) Analysis of multiple cell upset sensitivity in bulk CMOS SRAM after neutron irradiation 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 038501
|
[1] |
Liu Z, Chen S M and Chen J J 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 099401
|
[2] |
Zhang Z G, Liu J and Hou M D 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 086102
|
[3] |
Heidel D F, Marshall P W and Pellish J A 2009 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 56 3499
|
[4] |
Srour J R and Palko J W 2013 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 60 1740
|
[5] |
Pan X Y, Guo H X and Luo Y H 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 018501
|
[6] |
Liu B W, Chen J J and Chen S M 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 096102 (in Chinese)
|
[7] |
Li D, Yang S C and Chen W 2013 KANGHEJIAGU 30 20
|
[8] |
Luo Y H, Zhang F Q and Guo H X 2014 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 61 1918
|
[9] |
Gaspard N J, Witulski A F and Atkinson N M 2011 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 58 2614
|
[10] |
Gadlage M J, Kay M J and Duncan A R 2012 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 59 2722
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|