|
|
Effect of bias condition on heavy ion radiation in bipolar junction transistor |
Liu Chao-Ming (刘超铭), Li Xing-Ji (李兴冀), Geng Hong-Bin (耿洪滨), Yang De-Zhuang (杨德庄), He Shi-Yu (何世禹 ) |
Department of Material Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China |
|
|
Abstract The characteristic degradations in silicon NPN bipolar junction transistor (BJT) of 3DG142 type are examined under the irradiation with 40-MeV chlorine (Cl) ions under forward, grounded, and reverse bias conditions, respectively. Different electrical parameters are in-situ measured during the exposure under each bias condition. From the experimental data, larger variation of base current (IB) is observed after irradiation at a given value of base-emitter voltage (VBE), while the collector current is slightly affected by irradiation at a given VBE. The gain degradation is affected mostly by the behaviour of the base current. From the experimental data, the variation of current gain in the case of forward bias is much smaller than that in the other conditions. Moreover, for 3DG142 BJT, the current gain degradation in the case of reverse bias is more severe than that in the grounded case at low fluence, while at high fluence, the gain degradation in the reverse bias case becomes smaller than that in the grounded case.
|
Received: 04 December 2011
Revised: 17 December 2011
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
07.89.+b
|
(Environmental effects on instruments (e.g., radiation and pollution effects))
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (Grant No. HIT.KLOF.2010003) and the National Basis Research Foundation of China (Grant No. 51320). |
Corresponding Authors:
Li Xing-Ji
E-mail: lxj0218@hit.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Liu Chao-Ming (刘超铭), Li Xing-Ji (李兴冀), Geng Hong-Bin (耿洪滨), Yang De-Zhuang (杨德庄), He Shi-Yu (何世禹 ) Effect of bias condition on heavy ion radiation in bipolar junction transistor 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 080703
|
[1] |
Barnaby H J, Schrimpf R D, Sternberg A L, Berthe V, Cirba C R and Pease R L 2001 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 48 2074
|
[2] |
Barnaby H J, Schrimpf R D, Pease R L, Cole P, Turflinger T, Krieg J, Titus J, Emily D, Gehlhausen M, Witczak S C, Maher M C and Van Nort D 1999 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 46 1666
|
[3] |
Beaucour J, Carriere T, Gach A and Poirot P 1994 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 41 2420
|
[4] |
Johnston A H and Plaag P E 1987 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-34 1474
|
[5] |
Li X J, Geng H B, Liu C M, Zhao Z M, Lan M J, Yang D Z and He S Y 2010 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 57 831
|
[6] |
Li X J, Xiao J D, Liu C M, Zhao Z M, Geng H B, Lan M J, Yang D Z and He S Y 2010 Nucl. Instrum. Method A 621 707
|
[7] |
Li X J, Geng H B, Liu C M, Zhao Z M, Lan M J, Yang D Z and He S Y 2009 Nucl. Instrum. Method A 612 171
|
[8] |
Summers G P, Burke E A, Dale C J, Wolicki E A, Marshall P W and Gehlhausen M A 1987 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 34 1134
|
[9] |
Dinesh C M, Ramani, Radhakrishna M C, Dutt R N, Khan S A and Kanjilal D 2008 Nucl. Instrum. Method B 266 1713
|
[10] |
Kosier S L, Schrimpf R D, Nowlin R N, Fleetwood D M, DeLaus M, Pease P L, Combs W E, Wei A and Chai F 1993 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 40 1276
|
[11] |
Kamh S A and Solman F A S 2006 Nucl. Instrum. Method A 564 463
|
[12] |
Johnston A H, Swift G M and Rax B G 1994 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 41 2427
|
[13] |
Manghisoni M, Ratti L, Re V, Speziali V, Traversi G and Fallica G 2004 Nucl. Instrum. Method A 518 477
|
[14] |
Al-Mohamad A and Chahoud M 2005 Nucl. Instrum. Method A 538 703
|
[15] |
Li X J, Geng H B, Lan M J, Yang D Z, He S Y and Liu C M 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 056103
|
[16] |
Li X J, Geng H B, Lan M J, Yang D Z, He S Y and Liu C M 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 066103
|
[17] |
Barnaby H J, Smith S K, Schrimpf R D, Fleetwood D M and Pease R L 2002 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 49 2643
|
[18] |
Pershenkov V S, Chumakov K A, Nikiforov A Y, Chumakov A I, Ulimov V N and Romanenko A A 2007 IEEE 9th Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems 1
|
[19] |
Kosier S L, Combs W E, Wei A, Schrimpf R D, Fleetwood D M, DeLaus M and Pease R L 1994 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 41 1864
|
[20] |
Pershenkov V S, Maslov V B, Cherepko S V, Shvetzov-Shilovsky I N, Belyakov V V, Sogoyan A V, Rusanovsky V I, Ulimov V N, Emelianov V V and Nasibullin V S 1997 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 44 1840
|
[21] |
Jenkins K A, Cressler J D and Warnock J D 1991 IEEE IEDM Tech. Dig. 873
|
[22] |
Liu C M, Li X J, Geng H B, Zhao Z M, Yang D Z and He S Y 2010 Nucl. Instrum. Method A 624 671
|
[23] |
Messenger G C and Ash M S 1992 The Effects of Radiation on Electronic Systems 2nd edn. (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold) pp. 192-265
|
[24] |
Srour J R, Marshall C J and Marshall P W 2003 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 50 653
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|