CONDENSED MATTER: STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND THERMAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Degradation mechanisms of current gain in NPN transistors |
Li Xing-Ji(李兴冀)a)†, Geng Hong-Bin(耿洪滨)a), Lan Mu-Jie(兰慕杰)b), Yang De-Zhuang(杨德庄)a), He Shi-Yu(何世禹) a), and Liu Chao-Ming(刘超铭)a) |
a Space Materials and Environment Engineering Laboratory, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China; b School of Astronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China |
|
|
Abstract An investigation of ionization and displacement damage in silicon NPN bipolar junction transistors (BJTs) is presented. The transistors were irradiated separately with 90-keV electrons, 3-MeV protons and 40-MeV Br ions. Key parameters were measured in-situ and the change in current gain of the NPN BJTS was obtained at a fixed collector current ($I_{\rm c}=1$ mA). To characterise the radiation damage of NPN BJTs, the ionizing dose $D_{\rm i}$ and displacement dose $D_{\rm d}$ as functions of chip depth in the NPN BJTs were calculated using the SRIM and Geant4 code for protons, electrons and Br ions, respectively. Based on the discussion of the radiation damage equation for current gain, it is clear that the current gain degradation of the NPN BJTs is sensitive to both ionization and displacement damage. The degradation mechanism of the current gain is related to the ratio of $D_{\rm d}/(D_{\rm d}+D_{\rm i}$) in the sensitive region given by charged particles. The irradiation particles leading to lower $D_{\rm d}/(D_{\rm d}+D_{\rm i}$) within the same chip depth at a given total dose would mainly produce ionization damage to the NPN BJTs. On the other hand, the charged particles causing larger $D_{\rm d}/(D_{\rm d}+D_{\rm i})$ at a given total dose would tend to generate displacement damage to the NPN BJTs. The Messenger--Spratt equation could be used to describe the experimental data for the latter case.
|
Received: 17 September 2009
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
85.30.Pq
|
(Bipolar transistors)
|
|
85.30.De
|
(Semiconductor-device characterization, design, and modeling)
|
|
61.80.Fe
|
(Electron and positron radiation effects)
|
|
61.80.Jh
|
(Ion radiation effects)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National
Basic Research Program of China (Grant No.~61343). |
Cite this article:
Li Xing-Ji(李兴冀), Geng Hong-Bin(耿洪滨), Lan Mu-Jie(兰慕杰), Yang De-Zhuang(杨德庄), He Shi-Yu(何世禹), and Liu Chao-Ming(刘超铭) Degradation mechanisms of current gain in NPN transistors 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 066103
|
[1] |
Summers G P, Burke E A, Dale C J, Wolicki E A, Marshall P W and Gehlhausen M A 1987 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 34 1134
|
[2] |
Dinesh C M, Ramani, Radhakrishna M C, Dutt R N, Khan S A and Kanjilal D 2008 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 266 1713
|
[3] |
Zhang Y R, Zhang B, Li Z H, Lai C J and Li Z J 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 763
|
[4] |
Minson E, Sanchez I, Barnaby H J, Pease R L, Platteter D G and Dunham G 2004 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 51 3723
|
[5] |
Gao X, Yang S S, Xue Y X, Li K, Li D M, Wang Y, Wang Y F and Feng Z Z 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 5015
|
[6] |
Pease R L 2003 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 50 539
|
[7] |
Kosiert S L, Schrimpft R D, Nowlintt R N, Fleetwood D M, DeLaus M, Pease R L, Combsw W E, Weit A and Chait F 1993 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 40 1276
|
[8] |
Yan B P and Luo J S 1996 Chin. Phys. 5 923
|
[9] |
Schwank J R, Shaneyfelt M R, Fleetwood D M, Felix J A, Dodd P E, Paillet P and Ferlet-Cavrois V 2008 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 55 1833
|
[10] |
Oldham T R and McLean F B 2003 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 50 486
|
[11] |
He B P, Chen W and Wang G Zh 2006 Acta Phys. Sin. 55 3546 (in Chinese)
|
[12] |
Li D M, Wang Z H, Huang L Y and Gou Q J 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 3760
|
[13] |
Mandi\'c I, Cindro V, Kramberger G, Kri\v{s tof E S, Miku\v{z M, Vrta\v cnik D, Ullan M and Anghinolfi F 2004 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 51 1752
|
[14] |
Vuppala S, Li C, Zwicknagl P and Subramanian S 2003 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 50 1846
|
[15] |
Chen X J, Barnaby H J, Vermeire B, Holbert K, Wright D, Pease R L, Dunham G, Platteter D G, Seiler J, McClure S and Adell P 2007 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 54 1913
|
[16] |
Kamh S A and Solman F A S 2006 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 564 463
|
[17] |
Kulkarni S R, Ravindra M, Joshi G R and Damle R 2006 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 251 157
|
[18] |
Raymond J P and Petersen E L 1987 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-\textbf{34 1622
|
[19] |
Johnston A H, Swift G M and Rax B G 1994 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 41 2427
|
[20] |
Zheng Y Z, Lu W, Ren D Y, Wang Y Y, Guo Q, Yu X F and He C F 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 5572 (in Chinese)
|
[21] |
Ziegler J F 2004 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 219-220 1027 SRIM web site: http://www.SRIM.org
|
[22] |
Agostinelli S et al. (GEANT4 Collaboration) 2003 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506 250\\ Geant4 web site: http://cern.ch/geant4
|
[23] |
Messenger G C 1992 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 39 470
|
[24] |
Messenger G C and Ash M S 1992 The Effects of Radiation on Electronic Systems 2nd ed. (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold) p.~225
|
[25] |
Nowlin R N, Enlow E W, Schrimpf R D and Combs W E 1992 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 39 2026
|
[26] |
Barnaby H J 2006 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 3107
|
[27] |
Paillet P, Schwank J R, Shaneyfelt M R, Ferlet-Cavrois V, Jones R L, Flament O and Blackmore E W 2002 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 49 2656
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|