CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Effects of Mg substitution on the structural and magnetic properties of Co0.5Ni0.5-xMgxFe2O4 nanoparticle ferrites |
R M Rosnan, Z Othaman, R Hussin, Ali A Ati, Alireza Samavati, Shadab Dabagh, Samad Zare |
Centre for Sustainable Nanomaterials, Ibnu Sina Institute for Scientific and Industrial Research, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor Bahru, Malaysia |
|
|
Abstract In this study, nanocrystalline Co-Ni-Mg ferrite powders with composition Co0.5Ni0.5-xMgxFe2O4 are successfully synthesized by the co-precipitation method. A systematic investigation on the structural, morphological and magnetic properties of un-doped and Mg-doped Co-Ni ferrite nanoparticles is carried out. The prepared samples are characterized using x-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM). The XRD analyses of the synthesized samples confirm the formation of single-phase cubic spinel structures with crystallite sizes in a range of ~32 nm to ~36 nm. The lattice constant increases with increasing Mg content. FESEM images show that the synthesized samples are homogeneous with a uniformly distributed grain. The results of IR spectroscopy analysis indicate the formation of functional groups of spinel ferrite in the co-precipitation process. By increasing Mg2+ substitution, room temperature magnetic measurement shows that maximum magnetization and coercivity increase from ~57.35 emu/g to ~61.49 emu/g and ~603.26 Oe to ~684.11 Oe (1 Oe=79.5775 A·m-1), respectively. The higher values of magnetization Ms and Mr suggest that the optimum composition is Co0.5Ni0.4Mg0.1Fe2O4 that can be applied to high-density recording media and microwave devices.
|
Received: 01 October 2015
Revised: 16 December 2015
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
75.47.Lx
|
(Magnetic oxides)
|
|
75.60.-d
|
(Domain effects, magnetization curves, and hysteresis)
|
|
75.75.-c
|
(Magnetic properties of nanostructures)
|
|
81.20.Fw
|
(Sol-gel processing, precipitation)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the Ibnu Sina Institute for Scientific and Industrial Research, Physics Department of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia and the Ministry of Education Malaysia (Grant Nos. Q.J130000.2526.04H65). |
Corresponding Authors:
R M Rosnan
E-mail: rizuanmr@gmail.com
|
Cite this article:
R M Rosnan, Z Othaman, R Hussin, Ali A Ati, Alireza Samavati, Shadab Dabagh, Samad Zare Effects of Mg substitution on the structural and magnetic properties of Co0.5Ni0.5-xMgxFe2O4 nanoparticle ferrites 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 047501
|
[1] |
Šepelák V, Baabe D, Mienert D, Schultze D, Krumeich F, Litterst F J and Becker K D 2003 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 257 377
|
[2] |
Ramana C V, Kolekar Y D, Kamala Bharathi K, Sinha B and Ghosh K 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 183907
|
[3] |
Karanjkar M M, Tarwal N L, Vaigankar A S and Patil P S 2013 Ceram. Int. 39 1757
|
[4] |
Tan M, Köseoğlu Y, Alan F and Şentürk E 2011 J. Alloys Compd. 509 9399
|
[5] |
Patange S, Shirsath S E, Jangam Lohar G K, Jadhav S S and Jadhav K 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 053909
|
[6] |
Islam M U, Abbas T, Niazi S B, Ahmad Z, Sabeen S and Chaudhry M A 2004 Solid State Commun. 130 353
|
[7] |
He X M, Yan S M, Li Z W, Zhang X, Song X Y, Qiao W, Zhong W and Du Y W 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 127502
|
[8] |
Ati A A, Othaman Z and Samavati A 2013 J. Mol. Struct. 1052 177
|
[9] |
Li L Z, Tu X Q, Wang R and Peng L 2015 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 381 328
|
[10] |
Joshi S, Kumar S M, Chhoker S, Srivastava G, Jewariya M and Singh V N 2014 J. Mol. Struct. 1076 55
|
[11] |
Zhu X F and Chen L F 2011 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 323 3138
|
[12] |
Balaji S, Selvan R K, Berchmans L J, Angappan S, Subramanian K and Augustin C 2005 Mater. Sci. Eng. B 119 119
|
[13] |
Rahimi M, Kameli P, Ranjbar M, Hajihashemi H and Salamati H 2013 J. Mater. Sci. 48 2969
|
[14] |
Li L Z, Yu Z, Lan Z W, Sun K and Wu C J 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 13917
|
[15] |
Wang L, Lu M, Liu Y, Li J, Liu M and Li H 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 4176
|
[16] |
Deraz N M 2012 Ceram. Int. 38 511
|
[17] |
Sontu U B, Yelasani V and Musugu V R R 2015 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 374 376
|
[18] |
Tsay C Y, Lin Y H and Jen S U 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 5531
|
[19] |
Puli V S, Adireddy S and Ramana C V 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 644 470
|
[20] |
Shang Z F, Qi W H, Ji D H, Xu J, Tang G D, Zhang X Y, Li Z Z and Lang L L 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 107503
|
[21] |
Aghav P S, Dhage V N, Mane M L, Shengule D R, Dorik R G and Jadhav K M 2011 Physica B: Condens. Matter 406 4350
|
[22] |
Kumari S, Kumar V, Kumar P, Kar M and Kumar L 2015 Adv. Powder Technol. 26 213
|
[23] |
Sundararajan M, Kennedy L J, Aruldoss U, Khadeer S, Vijaya J J and Dunn S 2015 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 40 1
|
[24] |
Sekhar B C, Rao G S N, Caltun O F, Lakshmi B D, Rao B P and Rao P S V S 2016 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 398 59
|
[25] |
Reddy C V, Byon C, Narendra Baskar B D, Srinivas G, Shim J and Prabhakar Vattikuti S V 2015 Superlattices Microstruct. 82 165
|
[26] |
Akther Hossain A K M, Seki M, Kawai T and Tabata H 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 96 1273
|
[27] |
John Berchmans L, Kalai Selvan R, Selva Kumar P and Augustin C 2004 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 279 103
|
[28] |
Mirzaee S, Farjami Shayesteh S and Mahdavifar S 2014 Polymer 55 3713
|
[29] |
Raut A V, Barkule R S, Shengule D R, Jadhav K M 2014 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 358-359 87
|
[30] |
Raju K, Venkataiah G and Yoon D H 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 9337
|
[31] |
Rezlescu N, Rezlescu E, Pasnicu C and Craus M 1994 J. Phys: Condens. Mater. 6 5707
|
[32] |
Naeem M, Shah N A, Gul I H and Maqsood A 2009 J. Alloys. Compd. 487 739
|
[33] |
Denton A R and Ashcroft N W 1991 Phys. Rev. A 43 3161
|
[34] |
Reshak A H 2014 J. Alloys Compd. 589 213
|
[35] |
Waldron R D 1955 Phys. Rev. 99 1727
|
[36] |
Kumar V, Rana A, Kumar N and Pant R P 2011 Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 8 120
|
[37] |
Priyadharsini P, Pradeep A, Rao P S and Chandrasekaran G 2009 Mater. Chem. Phys. 116 207
|
[38] |
Pradeep A, Priyadharsini P and Chandrasekaran G 2008 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320 2774
|
[39] |
Gabal M A 2009 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321 3144
|
[40] |
Roy P K and Bera J 2006 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 298 38
|
[41] |
Gabal M A, El-Shishtawy R M and Al Angari Y M 2012 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324 2258
|
[42] |
Nath S K, Rahman M M, Sikder S, Hakim M and Hoque S M 2013 ARPN J. Sci. Tech. 3 106
|
[43] |
Yafet Y and Kittel C 1952 Phys. Rev. 87 290
|
[44] |
Bobade D H, Rathod S M and Mane M L 2012 Physica B: Condens. Matter 407 3700
|
[45] |
Panneer Muthuselvam I and Bhowmik R N 2010 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 322 767
|
[46] |
Iqbal M J, Ashiq M N, Hernandez-Gomez P and Munoz J M 2007 Scripta Mater. 57 1093
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|