|
|
Multifractal analysis of white matter structural changes on 3D magnetic resonance imaging between normal aging and early Alzheimer's disease |
Ni Huang-Jing (倪黄晶)a, Zhou Lu-Ping (周泸萍)b, Zeng Peng (曾彭)a, Huang Xiao-Lin (黄晓林)a, Liu Hong-Xing (刘红星)a, Ning Xin-Bao (宁新宝)a, the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiativea |
a School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
b School of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW 2522, Australia |
|
|
Abstract Applications of multifractal analysis to white matter structure changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have recently received increasing attentions. Although some progresses have been made, there is no evident study on applying multifractal analysis to evaluate the white matter structural changes on MRI for Alzheimer's disease (AD) research. In this paper, to explore multifractal analysis of white matter structural changes on 3D MRI volumes between normal aging and early AD, we not only extend the traditional box-counting multifractal analysis (BCMA) into the 3D case, but also propose a modified integer ratio based BCMA (IRBCMA) algorithm to compensate for the rigid division rule in BCMA. We verify multifractal characteristics in 3D white matter MRI volumes. In addition to the previously well studied multifractal feature, Δα, we also demonstrated Δf as an alternative and effective multifractal feature to distinguish NC from AD subjects. Both Δα and Δf are found to have strong positive correlation with the clinical MMSE scores with statistical significance. Moreover, the proposed IRBCMA can be an alternative and more accurate algorithm for 3D volume analysis. Our findings highlight the potential usefulness of multifractal analysis, which may contribute to clarify some aspects of the etiology of AD through detection of structural changes in white matter.
|
Received: 24 December 2014
Revised: 05 February 2015
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
05.45.Df
|
(Fractals)
|
|
47.53.+n
|
(Fractals in fluid dynamics)
|
|
87.19.lf
|
(MRI: anatomic, functional, spectral, diffusion)
|
|
87.61.-c
|
(Magnetic resonance imaging)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61271079), the Vice Chancellor Research Grant in University of Wollongong, and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, China. |
Corresponding Authors:
Zhou Lu-Ping, Ning Xin-Bao
E-mail: lupingz@uow.edu.au;xbning@nju.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Ni Huang-Jing (倪黄晶), Zhou Lu-Ping (周泸萍), Zeng Peng (曾彭), Huang Xiao-Lin (黄晓林), Liu Hong-Xing (刘红星), Ning Xin-Bao (宁新宝), the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Multifractal analysis of white matter structural changes on 3D magnetic resonance imaging between normal aging and early Alzheimer's disease 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 070502
|
[1] |
Salloway S and Correia S 2009 Clev Clin J. Med. 76 49
|
[2] |
Bartzokis G, Sultzer D, Lu P H, Nuechterlein K H, Mintz J and Cummings J L 2004 Neurobiol. Aging 25 843
|
[3] |
Han X, Holtzman D M, Mckeel D J, Kelley J and Morris J C 2002 J. Neurochem. 82 809
|
[4] |
Andin U, Passant U, Gustafson L and Englund E 2007 Arch. Gerontol. Geriat. 44 277
|
[5] |
Bauer C M, Cabral H J and Killiany R J 2014 Brain Imaging Behav. 8 133
|
[6] |
Migliaccio R, Agosta F, Possin K L, Rabinovici G D, Miller B L and Gorno-Tempini M L 2012 Alzheimer's & Dementia 8 S78
|
[7] |
Takahashi T, Murata T, Narita K, Hamada T, Kosaka H, Omori M, Takahashi K, Kimura H, Yoshida H and Wada Y 2006 Neuroimage 32 1158
|
[8] |
Zhang L, Liu J Z, Dean D, Sahgal V and Yue G H 2006 J. Neurosci. Meth. 150 242
|
[9] |
Halsey T C, Jensen M H, Kadanoff L P, Procaccia I and Shraiman B I 1986 Phys. Rev. A 33 1141
|
[10] |
Takahashi T, Murata T, Omori M, Kosaka H, Takahashi K, Yonekura Y and Wada Y 2004 J. Neurol Sci. 225 33
|
[11] |
Takahashi T, Kosaka H, Murata T, Omori M, Narita K, Mitsuya H, Takahashi K, Kimura H and Wada Y 2009 Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 171 177
|
[12] |
Wang D, Yu Z and Anh V 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 080504
|
[13] |
Zang B and Shang P 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 565
|
[14] |
Zhang M, Li Z, Chen X, Liu C, Teng S and Cheng C 2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 044210
|
[15] |
Lopes R, Dubois P, Bhouri I, Bedoui M H, Maouche S and Betrouni N 2011 Pattern Recogn. 44 1690
|
[16] |
Chen W, Giger M L, Li H, Bick U and Newstead G M 2007 Magn. Reson. Med. 58 562
|
[17] |
Long M and Peng F 2013 Radioengineering 22 208
|
[18] |
Chhabra A and Jensen R V 1989 Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 1327
|
[19] |
Xu Y, Qian C, Pan L, Wang B and Lou C 2012 Plos One 7 e29956
|
[20] |
Bisoi A K and Mishra J 2001 Pattern Recogn. Lett. 22 631
|
[21] |
Pangman V C, Sloan J and Guse L 2000 Appl. Nurs. Res. 13 209
|
[22] |
Ashburner J 2007 Neuroimage 38 95
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|