|
|
One-dimensional lazy quantum walks and occupancy rate |
Li Dan (李丹)a b, Michael Mc Gettrickb, Zhang Wei-Wei (张伟伟)a, Zhang Ke-Jia (张可佳)a |
a State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China;
b The De Brun Centre for Computational Algebra, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Applied Mathematics, National University of Ireland, Galway |
|
|
Abstract In this paper, we discuss the properties of lazy quantum walks. Our analysis shows that the lazy quantum walks have O(tn) order of the n-th moment of the corresponding probability distribution, which is the same as that for normal quantum walks. The lazy quantum walk with a discrete Fourier transform (DFT) coin operator has a similar probability distribution concentrated interval to that of the normal Hadamard quantum walk. Most importantly, we introduce the concepts of occupancy number and occupancy rate to measure the extent to which the walk has a (relatively) high probability at every position in its range. We conclude that the lazy quantum walks have a higher occupancy rate than other walks such as normal quantum walks, classical walks, and lazy classical walks.
|
Received: 21 October 2014
Revised: 03 December 2014
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.67.Ac
|
(Quantum algorithms, protocols, and simulations)
|
|
03.67.Lx
|
(Quantum computation architectures and implementations)
|
|
02.30.Nw
|
(Fourier analysis)
|
|
Fund: Project of Beijing, China (Grant No. YETP0475 and YETP0477), the BUPT Excellent Ph. D. Students Foundation (Grant Nos. CX201325 and CX201326), and the China Scholarship Council (Grant No. 201306470046). |
Corresponding Authors:
Li Dan
E-mail: lidansusu007@163.com
|
About author: 03.67.Ac; 03.67.Lx; 02.30.Nw |
Cite this article:
Li Dan (李丹), Michael Mc Gettrick, Zhang Wei-Wei (张伟伟), Zhang Ke-Jia (张可佳) One-dimensional lazy quantum walks and occupancy rate 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 050305
|
[1] |
Venegas-Andraca S E 2012 Quant. Inf. Proc. 11 1015
|
[2] |
Reitzner D, Nagaj D and Buzek V 2013 arXiv:quant-ph/1207.7283v2
|
[3] |
Ambainis A 2003 arXiv:quant-ph/0311001
|
[4] |
Shenvi N, Kempe J and Birgitta W K 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 052307
|
[5] |
Hein B and Tanner G 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 012326
|
[6] |
Berry S D and Wang J B 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 042333
|
[7] |
Tarrataca L and Wichert A 2013 Quant. Inf. Proc. 12 1365
|
[8] |
Li D, Zhang J, Guo F Z, Huang W, Wen Q Y and Chen H 2013 Quant. Inf. Proc. 12 1501
|
[9] |
Li D, Zhang J, Ma X W, Zhang W W and Wen Q Y 2013 Quant. Inf. Proc. 12 2167
|
[10] |
Berry S D and Wang J B 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 042317
|
[11] |
Douglas B L and Wang J B 2008 J. Phys. A 41 075303
|
[12] |
Ambainis A, Bach E, Nayak A, Vishwanath A and Watrous J 2011 STOC '01 Proceedings of the Thirty-third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (New York: ACM) pp. 37-49
|
[13] |
Nayak A and Vishwanath A 2000 arXiv:quant-ph/0010117
|
[14] |
Chou C I and Ho C L 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 110302
|
[15] |
Li M, Zhang Y S and Guo G C 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 030310
|
[16] |
Xue P and Sanders B C 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 022307
|
[17] |
DiFranco C, McGettrick M and Busch T 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 080502
|
[18] |
DiFranco C, McGettrick M, Machida T and Busch T 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 042337
|
[19] |
Inui N, Konno N and Segawa E 2005 arXiv:quant-ph/0507207v1
|
[20] |
Rohde P P, Schreiber A, Stefanak M, Jex I and Silberhorn C 2011 New J. Phys. 13 013001
|
[21] |
Mayer K, Tichy M C, Mintert F, Konrad T and Buchleitner A 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 062307
|
[22] |
Zhang R, Qin H, Tang B and Xue P 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 110312
|
[23] |
Zhang R, Xu Y Q and Xue P 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 010303
|
[24] |
Childs A M 2010 Commun. Math. Phys. 294 581
|
[25] |
Stefanak M, Bezdekova I and Jex I 2014 arXiv:1405.7146v2
|
[26] |
Falkner S and Boettcher S 2014 arXiv:1404.1330v2
|
[27] |
Stefanak M, Bezdekova I and Jex I 2012 Eur. Phys. J. D 66 142
|
[28] |
Stefanak M, Bezdekova I, Jex I and Barnett S M 2014 arXiv:1309.7835v2
|
[29] |
Machida T 2014 arXiv:1404.1522v1
|
[30] |
Carneiro I, Loo M, Xu X, Girerd M, Kendon V and Knight P L 2005 New J. Phys. 7 156
|
[31] |
Tregenna B, Flanagan W, Maile R and Kendon V 2003 New J. Phys. 5 83
|
[32] |
Maloyer O and Kendon V 2007 New J. Phys. 9 87
|
[33] |
Annabestani M, Abolhasani M R and Abal G 2010 J. Phys. A 43 075301
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|