CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Micromagnetic simulation of Sm-Co/α-Fe/Sm-Co trilayers with various angles between easy axes and the film plane |
Zhang Xi-Chao (张溪超)a, Zhao Guo-Ping (赵国平)a, Xia Jing (夏静)a, Yue Ming (岳明)b, Yuan Xin-Hong (袁新红)a, Xie Lin-Hua (谢林华)a |
a College of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610066, China; b College of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China |
|
|
Abstract Hysteresis loops and energy products have been calculated systematically by a three-dimensional (3D) software OOMMF for Sm-Co/α-Fe/Sm-Co trilayers with various thicknesses and β, where β is the angle between the easy axis and the field applied perpendicular to the film plane. It is found that trilayers with a perpendicular anisotropy possess considerably larger coercivities and smaller remanences and energy products compared with those with an in-plane anisotropy. Increase of β leads to a fast decrease of the maximum energy product as well as the drop of both remanence and coercivity. Such a drop is much faster than that in the single-phased hard material, which can explain the significant discrepancy between the experiment and the theoretical energy products. Some modeling techniques have been utilized with spin check procedures performed, which yield results in good agreement with the one-dimensional (1D) analytical and experimental data, justifying our calculations. Further, the calculated nucleation fields according to the 3D calculations are larger than those based on the 1D model, whereas the corresponding coercivity is smaller, leading to more square hysteresis loops and better agreement between experimental data and the theory.
|
Received: 16 February 2014
Revised: 13 March 2014
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
75.60.Jk
|
(Magnetization reversal mechanisms)
|
|
75.60.Ej
|
(Magnetization curves, hysteresis, Barkhausen and related effects)
|
|
75.70.Cn
|
(Magnetic properties of interfaces (multilayers, superlattices, heterostructures))
|
|
75.50.Ss
|
(Magnetic recording materials)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11074179, 10747007, 51331003, 51371011, and 51001002), the State Key Development Program of Basic Research of China (Grant No. 2010CB934600), the Construction Plan for Scientific Research Innovation Teams of Universities in Sichuan Province, China (Grant No. 12TD008), the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation, China (Grant No. 2122006), and Scientific Research Innovation Fund for Student in Sichuan Normal University, China. |
Corresponding Authors:
Zhao Guo-Ping
E-mail: zhaogp@uestc.edu.cn;_zapple2004@yahoo.com
|
Cite this article:
Zhang Xi-Chao (张溪超), Zhao Guo-Ping (赵国平), Xia Jing (夏静), Yue Ming (岳明), Yuan Xin-Hong (袁新红), Xie Lin-Hua (谢林华) Micromagnetic simulation of Sm-Co/α-Fe/Sm-Co trilayers with various angles between easy axes and the film plane 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 097504
|
[1] |
Kneller E F and Hawig R 1991 IEEE Trans. Magn. 27 3588
|
[2] |
Shindo M, Ishizone M, Sakuma A, Kato H and Miyazaki T 1997 J. Appl. Phys. 81 4444
|
[3] |
Sabiryanov R F and Jaswal S S 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 12071
|
[4] |
Liu J P, Liu Y, Skomski R and Sellmyer D J 1999 IEEE Trans. Magn. 35 3241
|
[5] |
Skomski R, Liu J P and Sellmyer D J 1999 Phys. Rev. B 60 7359
|
[6] |
Guo Z J, Jiang J S, Pearson J E, Bader S D and Liu J P 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 2029
|
[7] |
Liu W, Zhang Z D, Liu J P, Chen L J, He L L, Liu Y, Sun X K and Sellmyer D J 2002 Adv. Mater. 14 1832
|
[8] |
Choi Y, Jiang J S, Pearson J E, Bader S D, Kavich J J, Freeland J W and Liu J P 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 072509
|
[9] |
Liu Y, Wu Y Q, Kramer M J, Choi Y, Jiang J S, Wang Z L and Liu J P 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 192502
|
[10] |
Hou H C, Liao J W, Lin M S, Lin H J, Chang F H, Chen R Z, Chiu C H and Lai C H 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 07C104
|
[11] |
Amato M, Pini M G and Rettori A 1999 Phys. Rev. B 60 3414
|
[12] |
Fang W and Hong X X 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 036802
|
[13] |
Jia L Y, Yin J H and Ma X Q 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 027501
|
[14] |
Wang Y, Wang R, Xie H L, Bai J M and Wei F L 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 68506
|
[15] |
Papusoi C, Srinivasan K and Acharya R 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 110 083908
|
[16] |
Poudyal N and Liu J P 2013 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 46 043001
|
[17] |
Skomski R and Coey J M D 1993 Phys. Rev. B 48 15812
|
[18] |
Kopte M, Sawatzki S, Schultz L and Neu V 2011 IEEE Trans. Magn. 47 3736
|
[19] |
Alexandrakis V, Niarchos D, Tsiaoussis I and Panagiotopoulos I 2008 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320 1020
|
[20] |
Rong C B, Zhang Y, Kramer M J and Liu J P 2011 Phys. Lett. A 375 1329
|
[21] |
Cui W B, Takahashi Y K and Hono K 2012 Adv. Mater. 24 6530
|
[22] |
Knutson S J, Shen Y, Horwath J C, Barnes P and Chen C H 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 07A762
|
[23] |
Yuan F T, Hsiao S N, Liao W M, Chen S K and Yao Y D 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 99 08E915
|
[24] |
Tang J, Yang L R, Wang X J, Zhang L, Wei C F, Chen B W and Mei Y 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 240701 (in Chinese)
|
[25] |
Asti G, Solzi M, Ghidini M and Neri F M 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 174401
|
[26] |
Asti G, Ghidini M, Pellicelli R, Pernechele C, Solzi M, Albertini F, Casoli F, Fabbrici S and Pareti L 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 094406
|
[27] |
Zhao G P and Wang X L 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 012409
|
[28] |
Zhao G P, Zhao M G, Lim H S, Feng Y P and Ong C K 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 162513
|
[29] |
Belemuk A M and Chui S T 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 093909
|
[30] |
Xia J, Zhao G P, Zhang H W, Cheng Z H, Feng Y P, Ding J and Yang H T 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 112 013918
|
[31] |
Belemuk A M and Chui S T 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 110 073918
|
[32] |
Li L L and Bao J C 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 127502
|
[33] |
Sawatzki S, Heller R, Mickel C, Seifert M, Schultz L and Neu V 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 123922
|
[34] |
Zhang J, Takahashi Y K, Gopalan R and Hono K 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 122509
|
[35] |
Donahue M J and Porter D G 1999 OOMMF user's guide, version 1.0. NISTIR 6376 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
|
[36] |
Brown W F, Jr 1945 Rev. Mod. Phys. 17 15
|
[37] |
Fullerton E E, Jiang J S, Grimsditch M, Sowers C H and Bader S D 1998 Phys. Rev. B. 58 12193
|
[38] |
Hillebrands B and Ounadjela K 2003 Spin Dynamics in Confined Magnetic Structures II (Berlin: Springer)
|
[39] |
Stoner E C and Wohlfarth E P 1948 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 240 599
|
[40] |
At the remanent state, all the magnetizations orient at the easy axis direction, with the remanence given by: Mr=(LhMsh+ LsMSs/2)cosβ/(Lh+Ls/2)
|
[41] |
Chen B Z, Zhao G P, Zhang H W and Zhong Z Y 2012 Physica B: Conden. Matter 407 4574
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|