CLASSICAL AREAS OF PHENOMENOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Quantum interferences in four-wave mixing processes inside a cavity driven by quantized fields |
Li Peng-Bo(李蓬勃)† |
Department of Applied Physics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China |
|
|
Abstract Interferences in the quantum fluctuations of the output fields are demonstrated in four-wave mixing processes inside a cavity, which is driven by two quantized fields at the signal and the idler frequencies. These interferences depend on the phase fluctuations of the input fields and induce mode splitting in the transmission spectra.
|
Received: 08 July 2010
Revised: 17 January 2011
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
42.50.Lc
|
(Quantum fluctuations, quantum noise, and quantum jumps)
|
|
42.50.Gy
|
(Effects of atomic coherence on propagation, absorption, and Amplification of light; electromagnetically induced transparency and Absorption)
|
|
42.65.-k
|
(Nonlinear optics)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the New Staff Research Support Plan of Xi'an Jiaotong University, China (Grant No. 08141015). |
Cite this article:
Li Peng-Bo(李蓬勃) Quantum interferences in four-wave mixing processes inside a cavity driven by quantized fields 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 054202
|
[1] |
Ficek Z and Swain S 2004 emphQuantum Interference and Coherence (Berlin: Springer-Verlag)
|
[2] |
Deng L, Payne M G and Garrett W R 2006 emphPhys. Rep. 429 123
|
[3] |
Harris S E 1997 emphPhys. Today 50 36
|
[4] |
Fleischhauer M, Imamoglu A and Marangos J P 2005 emphRev. Mod. Phys. 77 633
|
[5] |
Harris S E, Field J E and Imamoglu A 1990 emphPhys. Rev. Lett. 64 1107
|
[6] |
Schmidt H and Imamoglu A 1996 emphOpt. Lett. 21 1936
|
[7] |
Morigi G, Eschner J and Keitel C H 2000 emphPhys. Rev. Lett. 85 4458
|
[8] |
Fleischhauer M and Lukin M D 2000 emphPhys. Rev. Lett. 84 5094
|
[9] |
Li P B, Gu Y, Wang K and Gong Q H 2006 emphPhys. Rev. A 73 032343
|
[10] |
Lukin M D and Imamoglu A 2001 emphNature 413 273
|
[11] |
Hu X Y, Gu Y, Gong Q H and Guo G C 2010 emphChin. Phys. B 19 050305
|
[12] |
Ma H, Ye C, Wei D and Zhang J 2005 emphPhys. Rev. Lett. 95 233601
|
[13] |
Agarwal G S 2006 emphPhys. Rev. Lett. 97 023601
|
[14] |
Zhao C Y and Tan W H 2009 emphChin. Phys. B 18 4143
|
[15] |
Walls D F and Milburn G J 1994 emphQuantum Optics (Berlin: Springer-Verlag)
|
[16] |
Reid M D and Walls D F 1986 emphPhys. Rev. A 34 4929
|
[17] |
Zhang Y L, Jiang L, Sun Z R, Ding L E and Wang Z G 2003 emphChin. Phys. 12 0174
|
[18] |
Collett M J and Gardiner C W 1984 emphPhys. Rev. A 30 1386
|
[19] |
Davidovich L 1996 emphRev. Mod. Phys. 68 127
|
[20] |
Prado F O, De Almeida A G, Moussa M H Y and Villas-Boas C J 2006 emphPhys. Rev. A 73 043803
|
[21] |
Guzman R, Retamal J C, Solano E and Zagury N 2006 emphPhys. Rev. Lett. 96 010502
|
[22] |
Gardiner C W and Zoller P 2000 emphQuantum Noise (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) endfootnotesize
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|