|
|
|
Impact of the chaotic semiconductor laser output power on time-delay-signature of chaos and random bit generation |
| Chenpeng Xue(薛琛鹏)1, Wang Xu(王绪)1, Likai Zheng(郑利凯)1, Haoyu Zhang(张昊宇)1, Yanhua Hong2, and Zuxing Zhang(张祖兴)1,† |
1 College of Electronic and Optical Engineering and College of Flexible Electronics (Future Technology), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China;
2 School of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 1UT, UK |
|
|
|
|
Abstract We experimentally analyze the effect of the optical power on the time delay signature identification and the random bit generation in chaotic semiconductor laser with optical feedback. Due to the inevitable noise during the photoelectric detection and analog-digital conversion, the varying of output optical power would change the signal to noise ratio, then impact time delay signature identification and the random bit generation. Our results show that, when the optical power is less than $-14 $ dBm, with the decreasing of the optical power, the actual identified time delay signature degrades and the entropy of the chaotic signal increases. Moreover, the extracted random bit sequence with lower optical power is more easily pass through the randomness testing.
|
Received: 03 December 2024
Revised: 05 January 2025
Accepted manuscript online: 09 January 2025
|
|
PACS:
|
05.45.-a
|
(Nonlinear dynamics and chaos)
|
| |
05.45.Gg
|
(Control of chaos, applications of chaos)
|
| |
05.45.Tp
|
(Time series analysis)
|
| |
05.40.Ca
|
(Noise)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62005129 and 62175116). |
Corresponding Authors:
Zuxing Zhang
E-mail: zxzhang@njupt.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Chenpeng Xue(薛琛鹏), Wang Xu(王绪), Likai Zheng(郑利凯), Haoyu Zhang(张昊宇), Yanhua Hong, and Zuxing Zhang(张祖兴) Impact of the chaotic semiconductor laser output power on time-delay-signature of chaos and random bit generation 2025 Chin. Phys. B 34 030504
|
[1] Argyris A, Syvridis D, Larger L, Annovazzi-Lodi V, Colet P, Fischer I, García-Ojalvo J, Mirasso C R, Pesquera L and Shore K A 2005 Nature 438 343
[2] Xiang S, Wang B, Wang Y, Han Y, Wen A and Hao Y 2019 J. Lightw. Technol. 37 3987
[3] Gao H,Wang A,Wang L, Jia Z, Guo Y, Gao Z, Yan L, Qin Y andWang Y 2021 Light Sci. Appl. 10 172
[4] Li J, Li Y, Dong Y, Yang Y, Xiao J and Huang Y 2023 Chin. Opt. Lett. 21 061901
[5] Cheng C H, Chen C Y, Chen J D, Pan D K, Ting K T and Lin F Y 2018 Opt. Express 26 12230
[6] Gao Z, Li Q, Tang B, Zhang L, Luo Y, Fu S, Li Z, Wang Y and Qin Y 2022 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, May 15-20, 2022, San Jose, California, USA, p. SF4L.4
[7] Wu Y, Luo H, Deng L, Yang Q, Dai X, liu D and Cheng M 2022 Opt. Lett. 47 5285
[8] Yang Z, Yi L, Ke J, Zhuge Q, Yang Y and Hu W 2020 J. Lightw. Technol. 38 4648
[9] Li P, Li Q, Tang W, Wang W, Zhang W, Little B E, Chu S T, Shore K A, Qin Y and Wang Y 2024 Light Sci. Appl. 13 66
[10] Liu S, Jiang N, Zhang Y, Wang C, Zhao A, Qiu K and Zhang Q 2022 Opt. Express 30 32366
[11] Wang C, Li J, Zhou X, Cheng Z, Qiao L, Xue X and Zhang M 2023 Light Sci. Appl. 12 213
[12] Udaltsov V S, Larger L, Goedgebuer J P, Locquet A and Citrin D S 2005 J. Opt. Technol. 72 373
[13] Kai C, Li P, Wang B, Shore K A, Qin Y and Wang Y 2023 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 29 7700407
[14] Chen Y, Xin R, Cheng M, Gao X, Li S, Shao W, Deng L, Zhang M, Fu S and Liu D 2020 Opt. Express 28 15221
[15] Zunino L, Soriano M C, Fischer I, Rosso O A and Mirasso C R 2010 Phys. Rev. E 82 046212
[16] Rontani D, Locquet A, Sciamanna M, Citrin D S and Ortin S 2009 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 45 879
[17] Zhang J, Feng C, Zhang M, Liu Y, Wu C and Wang Y 2018 Opt. Express 26 6962
[18] Wang Y, Xiang S, Wang B, Cao X, Wen A and Hao Y 2019 Opt. Express 27 8446
[19] Jiang N, Wang Y, Zhao A, Liu S, Zhang Y, Chen L, Li B and Qiu K 2020 Opt. Express 28 1999
[20] Rontani D, Locquet A, Sciamanna M and Citrin D S 2007 Opt. Lett. 32 2960
[21] Wu J, Xia G and Wu Z 2009 Opt. Express 17 20124
[22] Cui B, Xia G, Tang X, Wang F, Jiang Z, Zheng Y, Zhang F and Wu Z 2022 IEEE Photon. J. 14 1504605
[23] Hong Y, Zhong Z and Shore K A 2024 Frontiers in Network Physiology 3 1330375
[24] Li S S and Chan S C 2015 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 21 1800812
[25] Ke J, Yi L, Hou T, Hu Y, Xia G and Hu W 2017 IEEE Photon. J. 9 7200808
[26] Wang D, Wang L, Zhao T, Gao H, Wang Y, Chen X and Wang A 2017 Opt. Express 25 10911
[27] Wang D, Lei Y, Shi P and Li Z 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 90505
[28] Li S S, Li X Z and Chan S C 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 4751
[29] Zhao A, Jiang N, Wang C, Liu S and Qiu K 2023 Acta Opt. Sin. 43 0114002
[30] Lin F Y and Liu J M 2003 Opt. Commun. 221 173
[31] Lin, F Y, Chao Y K and Wu T C 2012 IEEE J Quantum Electron. 48 1010
[32] Agrawal G P 2010 Fiber-Optics Communication Systems, 4th edn. (New York: Jhon Wiley & Sons) pp. 151-154
[33] Tseng C H, Funabashi R, Kanno K, Uchida A, Wei C C and Hwang S K 2024 Opt. Express 32 23097
[34] Yamazaki T and Uchida A 2013 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 19 0600309
[35] Guo H, Tang W, Liu Y and Wei W 2010 Phys. Rev. E 81 051137 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
