Special Issue:
SPECIAL TOPIC — Plasma disruption
|
SPECIAL TOPIC—Plasma disruption |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Stability impacts from the current and pressure profile modifications within finite sized island |
Yuxiang Sun(孙宇翔) and Di Hu(胡地)† |
School of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China |
|
|
Abstract The stability (or instability) of finite sized magnetic island could play a significant role in disruption avoidance or disruption mitigation dynamics. Especially, various current and pressure profile modifications, such as the current drive and heating caused by electron cyclotron wave, or the radiative cooling and current expulsion caused by the shattered pellet injection could be applied within the island to modify its stability, thus changing the ensuing dynamics. In this study, we calculate the mode structure modification caused by such profile changes within the island using the perturbed equilibrium approach, thus obtain the change of stability criterion $\varDelta$' and assess the corresponding quasi-linear island stability. The positive helical current perturbation is found to always stabilize the island, while the negative one is found to do the opposite, in agreement with previous results. The pressure bump or hole within the island has a more complicated stability impact. In the small island regime, its contribution is monotonic, with pressure bump that tends to stabilize the island while pressure hole destabilizes it. This effect is relatively weak, though, due to the cancellation of the pressure term's odd parity contribution in the second derivatives of the mode structure. In the large island regime, such cancellation is broken due to the island asymmetry, and the pressure contribution to stability is manifested, which is non-monotonic. The stability analysis in this paper helps to more accurately clarify the expected island response in the presence of profile modifications caused by disruption avoidance or mitigation systems.
|
Received: 30 December 2022
Revised: 05 May 2023
Accepted manuscript online: 09 May 2023
|
PACS:
|
52.55.Fa
|
(Tokamaks, spherical tokamaks)
|
|
52.55.-s
|
(Magnetic confinement and equilibrium)
|
|
52.35.Py
|
(Macroinstabilities (hydromagnetic, e.g., kink, fire-hose, mirror, ballooning, tearing, trapped-particle, flute, Rayleigh-Taylor, etc.))
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National MCF Energy Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFE03010001) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11905004). |
Corresponding Authors:
Di Hu
E-mail: hudi2@buaa.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Yuxiang Sun(孙宇翔) and Di Hu(胡地) Stability impacts from the current and pressure profile modifications within finite sized island 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 075212
|
[1] Lehnen M, Aleynikova K, Aleynikov P B, et al. 2015 J. Nucl. Mater. 463 39 [2] Fil A, Nardon E, Hoelzl M, et al. 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 062509 [3] Zohm H, Gantenbein G, Giruzzi G, et al. 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 577 [4] Giruzzi G and Zabiego M 2001 Fusion Eng. Des. 53 43 [5] Tang W K, Wang Z X, Wei L, et al. 2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 026015 [6] Zhang Y, Wang X J, Zhang X D, et al. 2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 096028 [7] Shiraki D, Commaux N, Baylor L R, et al. 2018 Nucl. Fusion 58 056006 [8] Li Y, Chen Z Y, Wei Y N, et al. 2018 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89 10K116 [9] Xu H B, Nie L, Zhu G L, et al. 2018 Fusion Sci. Technol. 75 98 [10] Baylor L R, Meitner S J, Gebhart T E, et al. 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 066008 [11] Raman R, Sweeney R, Moyer R A, et al. 2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 036014 [12] Sweeney R, Baylor L, Eidietis N W, et al. 2020 Nucl. Fusion 61 066040 [13] Park S, Lee K, Baylor L R, et al. 2020 Fusion Eng. Des. 154 111535 [14] Sheikh U A, Shiraki D, Sweeney R, et al. 2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 126043 [15] Park S, Lee K, Lee H, et al. 2021 Fusion Eng. Des. 164 112200 [16] Jachmich S, Kruezi U, Lehnen M, et al. 2022 Nucl. Fusion 62 026012 [17] Jang J, Kim J, Kim J, et al. 2022 Fusion Eng. Des. 180 113172 [18] Pautasso G, Zhang Y, Reiter B, et al. 2011 Nucl. Fusion 51 103009 [19] Lehnen M, Alonso A, Arnoux G, et al. 2011 Nucl. Fusion 51 123010 [20] Hollmann E M, Arnoux G, Commaux N, et al. 2011 J. Nucl. Mater. 415 S27 [21] Reux C, Plyusnin V, Alper B, et al. 2015 J. Nucl. Mater. 463 143 [22] Duan X R, Liu Y, Xu M, et al. 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 102013 [23] Chen D L, Shen B, Granetz R S, et al. 2018 Nucl. Fusion 58 036003 [24] Ding Y H, Chen Z Y, Chen Z P, et al. 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 125101 [25] Hollmann E M, Parks P B, Shiraki D, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 065001 [26] Izzo V A 2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 066023 [27] Nardon E, Fil A, Hoelzl M, et al. 2016 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 59 014006 [28] Hu D, Nardon E, Lehnen M, et al. 2018 Nucl. Fusion 58 126025 [29] Kim C C, Liu Y, Parks P B, et al. 2019 Phys. Plasmas 26 042510 [30] Ferraro N M, Lyons B C, Kim C C, Liu Y Q and Jardin S C 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 016001 [31] Hoelzl M, Hu D, Nardon E and Huijsmans G T A 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 022510 [32] Nardon E, Hu D, Hoelzl M and Bonfiglio D 2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 126040 [33] Zafar A, Zhu P, Ali A, Zeng S Y and Li H L 2021 Plasma Sci. Technol. 23 075103 [34] Hu D, Nardon E, Hoelzl M, et al. 2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 026015 [35] Zeng S Y, Zhu P, Izzo V A, Li H L and Jiang Z H 2021 Nucl. Fusion 62 026015 [36] Hu D and Zakharov L E 2015 J. Plasma Phys. 81 515810602 [37] Liu Y, Akcay C, Lao L L and Sun X 2022 Nucl. Fusion 62 126067 [38] Lao L L, Kruger S, Akcay C, et al. 2022 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 64 074001 [39] Zakharov L E 1978 Nucl. Fusion 18 335 [40] White R B, Gates D A and Brennan D P 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 022514 [41] Zakharov L E and Shafranov V D 1986 Reviews of plasma physics (New York: Consultants Bureau) p. 153 [42] Yu Q, Günter S, Lackner K, Gude A and Maraschek M 2000 Nucl. Fusion 40 2031 [43] Rutherford P H 1973 Phys. Fluids 16 1903 [44] Kotschenreuther M, Hazeltine R D and Morrison R J 1985 Phys. Fluids 28 294 [45] Wesson J, Campbel D J, Connor J W, et al. 2011 Tokamaks, 4th edn.(New York: Oxford) p. 152 [46] Glasser A H, Greene J M and Johnson J L 1975 Phys. Fluids 18 875 [47] Kikuchi M and Azumi M 1995 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 37 1215 [48] Hornsby W A, Peeters A G, Snodin A P, et al. 2010 Phys. Plasmas 17 092301 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|