Special Issue:
SPECIAL TOPIC — Ion beam modification of materials and applications
|
SPECIAL TOPIC—Ion beam modification of materials and applications |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Evolution of helium bubbles in nickel-based alloy by post-implantation annealing |
Rui Zhu(朱睿)1,2, Qin Zhou(周钦)1,†, Li Shi(史力)1, Li-Bin Sun(孙立斌)1, Xin-Xin Wu(吴莘馨)1, Sha-Sha Lv(吕沙沙)3,‡, and Zheng-Cao Li(李正操)2 |
1 Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2 Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials(Ministry of Education), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 3 Key Laboratory of Beam Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China |
|
|
Abstract Nickel-based alloys have been considered as candidate structural materials used in generation IV nuclear reactors serving at high temperatures. In the present study, alloy 617 was irradiated with 180-keV helium ions to a fluence of 3.6×1017 ions/cm2 at room temperature. Throughout the cross-section transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image, numerous over-pressurized helium bubbles in spherical shape are observed with the actual concentration profile a little deeper than the SRIM predicted result. Post-implantation annealing was conducted at 700 ℃ for 2 h to investigate the bubble evolution. The long-range migration of helium bubbles occurred during the annealing process, which makes the bubbles of the peak region transform into a faceted shape as well. Then the coarsening mechanism of helium bubbles at different depths is discussed and related to the migration and coalescence (MC) mechanism. With the diffusion of nickel atoms slowed down by the alloy elements, the migration and coalescence of bubbles are suppressed in alloy 617, leading to a better helium irradiation resistance.
|
Received: 13 January 2021
Revised: 31 March 2021
Accepted manuscript online: 03 June 2021
|
PACS:
|
61.72.U-
|
(Doping and impurity implantation)
|
|
61.80.Jh
|
(Ion radiation effects)
|
|
61.82.-d
|
(Radiation effects on specific materials)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the Special Funds for the Key Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant Nos. 2017YFB0702201 and 2020YFB1901800) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11975135 and 12005017). |
Corresponding Authors:
Qin Zhou, Sha-Sha Lv
E-mail: qinzhou@tsinghua.edu.cn;lvss@bnu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Rui Zhu(朱睿), Qin Zhou(周钦), Li Shi(史力), Li-Bin Sun(孙立斌), Xin-Xin Wu(吴莘馨), Sha-Sha Lv(吕沙沙), and Zheng-Cao Li(李正操) Evolution of helium bubbles in nickel-based alloy by post-implantation annealing 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 086102
|
[1] Abram T and Ion S 2008 Energy Policy 36 4323 [2] Locatelli G, Mancini M and Todeschini N 2013 Energy Policy 61 1503 [3] Forsberg C W, Peterson P F and Pickard P S 2003 Nucl. Technol. 144 289 [4] Ren W and Swindeman R 2009 Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology 131 044002 [5] Sharma S K, Ko G D, Li F X and Kang K J 2008 J. Nucl. Mater. 378 144 [6] Wolfer W 2012 Fundamental properties of defects in metals [7] Trinkaus H and Singh B 2003 J. Nucl. Mater. 323 229 [8] Schroeder H, Kesternich W and Ullmaier H 1985 Nuclear Engineering and Design: Fusion 2 65 [9] Ullmaier H 1984 Nuclear Fusion 24 1039 [10] Singh B and Trinkaus H 1992 J. Nucl. Mater. 186 153 [11] Greenwood G, Foreman A and Rimmer D 1959 J. Nucl. Mater. 1 305 [12] Carsughi F, Ullmaier H, Trinkaus H, Kesternich W and Zell V 1994 J. Nucl. Mater. 212 336 [13] Villacampa I, Chen J, Spätig P, Seifert H and Duval F 2018 J. Nucl. Mater. 500 389 [14] Chen Y, Li Y, Ran G, Wu L, Ye C, Han Q, Wang H and Du H 2020 Prog. Nucl. Energy 129 103502 [15] Ziegler J F, Ziegler M D and Biersack J P 2010 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 268 1818 [16] Lv S, Zhu R, Zhao Y, Li M, Wang G, Qiu M, Liao B, Hua Q, Cheng J and Li Z 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 040704 [17] Zhang Y, Lian J, Zhu Z, Bennett W D, Saraf L V, Rausch J L, Hendricks C A, Ewing R and Weber W J 2009 J. Nucl. Mater. 389 303 [18] Goodhew P 1981 The shape of an overpressurized bubble [19] Chernikov V, Trinkaus H, Jung P and Ullmaier H 1990 J. Nucl. Mater. 170 31 [20] Trinkaus H 1989 Scripta Metallurgica 23 1773 [21] Chernikov V, Trinkaus H and Ullmaier H 1997 J. Nucl. Mater. 250 103 [22] Wei Q, Nan L, Kai S and Wang L M 2010 Scripta Materialia 63 430 [23] Gao J, Bao L, Huang H, Li Y, Zeng J, Liu Z, Liu R and Shi L 2016 Materials 9 832 [24] Yan Z, Liu S, Xia S, Zhang Y, Wang Y and Yang T 2018 J. Nucl. Mater. 505 200 [25] Liu J, Huang H, Liu R, Zhu Z, Lei Q, Liu A and Li Y 2020 J. Nucl. Mater. 537 152184 [26] Zhang W, Han H, Dai J, Ren C, Wang C, Yan L, Huang H and Zhu Z 2019 J. Nucl. Mater. 518 48 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|