INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Exploring how hydrogen at gold-sulfur interface affects spin transport in single-molecule junction |
Jing Zeng(曾晶)1,3, Ke-Qiu Chen(陈克求)2, Yanhong Zhou(周艳红)4 |
1 College of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang 421002, China; 2 Department of Applied Physics, School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China; 3 Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing and Application, Hengyang 421002, China; 4 College of Science, East China Jiao Tong University, Nanchang 330013, China |
|
|
Abstract Very recently, experimental evidence showed that the hydrogen is retained in dithiol-terminated single-molecule junction under the widely adopted preparation conditions, which is in contrast to the accepted view[Nat. Chem. 11 351 (2019)]. However, the hydrogen is generally assumed to be lost in the previous physical models of single-molecule junctions. Whether the retention of the hydrogen at the gold-sulfur interface exerts a significant effect on the theoretical prediction of spin transport properties is an open question. Therefore, here in this paper we carry out a comparative study of spin transport in M-tetraphenylporphyrin-based (M=V, Cr, Mn, Fe, and Co; M-TPP) single-molecule junction through Au-SR and Au-S(H)R bondings. The results show that the hydrogen at the gold-sulfur interface may dramatically affect the spin-filtering efficiency of M-TPP-based single-molecule junction, depending on the type of transition metal ions embedded into porphyrin ring. Moreover, we find that for the Co-TPP-based molecular junction, the hydrogen at the gold-sulfur interface has no obvious effect on transmission at the Fermi level, but it has a significant effect on the spin-dependent transmission dip induced by the quantum interference on the occupied side. Thus the fate of hydrogen should be concerned in the physical model according to the actual preparation condition, which is important for our fundamental understanding of spin transport in the single-molecule junctions. Our work also provides guidance in how to experimentally identify the nature of gold-sulfur interface in the single-molecule junction with spin-polarized transport.
|
Received: 06 March 2020
Revised: 02 April 2020
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
85.65.+h
|
(Molecular electronic devices)
|
|
73.40.-c
|
(Electronic transport in interface structures)
|
|
73.63.-b
|
(Electronic transport in nanoscale materials and structures)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11674092, 11804093, and 61764005), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 2019JJ40006), the Scientific Research Fund of the Education Department of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 18B368), the Science and Technology Development Plan Project of Hengyang City, China (Grant No. 2018KJ121), and the Science and Technology Plan Project of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 2016TP1020). |
Corresponding Authors:
Jing Zeng, Ke-Qiu Chen
E-mail: zengjing@hynu.edu.cn;keqiuchen@hnu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Jing Zeng(曾晶), Ke-Qiu Chen(陈克求), Yanhong Zhou(周艳红) Exploring how hydrogen at gold-sulfur interface affects spin transport in single-molecule junction 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 088503
|
[1] |
Ke G, Duan C, Huang F and Guo X 2020 InfoMat 2 92
|
[2] |
Andres R P, Bein T, Dorogi M, Feng S, Henderson J I, Kubiak C P, Mahoney W, Osifchin R G and Reifenberger R 1996 Science 272 1323
|
[3] |
Kuang G, Chen S Z, Yan L, Chen K Q, Shang X, Liu P N and Lin N 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 570
|
[4] |
Jia C, Migliore A, Xin N, Huang S, Wang J, Yang Q, Wang S, Chen H, Wang D, Feng B, Liu Z, Zhang G, Qu D H, Tian H, Ratner M A, Xu H Q, Nitzan A and Guo X 2016 Science 352 1443
|
[5] |
Xin N, Wang J, Jia C, Liu Z, Zhang X, Yu C, Li M, Wang S, Gong Y, Sun H, Zhang G, Liu Z, Zhang G, Liao J, Zhang D and Guo X 2017 Nano Lett. 17 856
|
[6] |
Zeng J, Chen K Q and Tong Y X 2018 Carbon 127 611
|
[7] |
Zhang Z, Guo C, Kwong D J, Li J, Deng X and Fan Z 2013 Adv. Funct. Mater. 23 2765
|
[8] |
Qiu M, Zhang Z H, Deng X Q and Pan J B 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 242109
|
[9] |
Kuang G, Chen S Z, Wang W, Lin T, Chen K, Shang X, Liu P N and Lin N 2016 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 11140
|
[10] |
Pan C N, Long M Q and He J 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 088101
|
[11] |
Zeng Y J, Liu Y Y, Zhou W X and Chen K Q 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 036304
|
[12] |
Gu Y, Hu Y, Huang J, Li Q and Yang J 2019 J. Phys. Chem. C 123 16366
|
[13] |
Yang K, Chen H, Pope T, Hu Y, Liu L, Wang D, Tao L, Xiao W, Fei X, Zhang Y Y, Luo H G, Du S, Xiang T, Hofer W A and Gao H J 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 1
|
[14] |
Zeng J and Chen K Q 2020 J. Mater. Chem. C 8 3758
|
[15] |
Garner M H, Li H, Chen Y, Su T A, Shangguan Z, Paley D W, Liu T, Ng F, Li H, Xiao S, Nuckolls C, Venkataraman L and Solomon G C 2018 Nature 558 415
|
[16] |
Shi X, Dai Z and Zeng Z 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 235412
|
[17] |
Cai S, Deng W, Huang F, Chen L, Tang C, He W, Long S, Li R, Tan Z, Liu J, Shi J, Liu Z, Xiao Z, Zhang D and Hong W 2019 Angew. Chem. 131 3869
|
[18] |
Frisenda R, Janssen V A E C, Grozema F C, van der Zant H S J and Renaud N 2016 Nat. Chem. 8 1099
|
[19] |
Pilevarshahri R, Rungger I, Archer T Sanvito S and Shahtahmassebi N 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 174437
|
[20] |
Tsuji Y, Staykov A and Yoshizawa K 2011 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 5955
|
[21] |
Cho W J, Cho Y, Min S K, Kim W Y and Kim K S 2011 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 9364
|
[22] |
Han L, Zuo X, Li H, Li Y, Fang C and Liu D 2019 J. Phys. Chem. C 123 2736
|
[23] |
Deng X, Zhang Z, Zhou J and Qiu M 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 143103
|
[24] |
Kwong G, Zhang Z and Pan J 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 123108
|
[25] |
Xie F, Fan Z Q, Chen K Q, Zhang X J and Long M Q 2017 Org. Electron. 50 198
|
[26] |
Fan Z Q, Zhang Z H, Qiu M, Deng X Q and Tang G P 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 073104
|
[27] |
Qiu M, Zhang Z, Fan Z, Deng X and Pan J 2011 J. Phys. Chem. C 115 11734
|
[28] |
Zeng J and Chen K Q 2017 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 9417
|
[29] |
Häkkinen, H 2012 Nat. Chem. 4 443
|
[30] |
Inkpen M S, Liu Z F, Li H, Campos L M, Neaton J B and Venkataraman L 2019 Nat. Chem. 11 351
|
[31] |
Brandbyge M, Mozos J L, Ordejón P, Taylor J and Stokbro K 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 165401
|
[32] |
Hong K and Kim W Y 2013 Angew. Chem. 125 3473
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|