|
|
Quantum-classical correspondence and mechanical analysis ofa classical-quantum chaotic system |
Haiyun Bi(毕海云)1,3, Guoyuan Qi(齐国元)2, Jianbing Hu(胡建兵)1, Qiliang Wu(吴启亮)4 |
1 School of Mechanical Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300384, China; 2 Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology of Electrical Engineering and Energy, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300384, China; 3 The Key Laboratory of Advanced Perception and Intelligent Control of High-end Equipment, Ministry of Education, and School of Mathematics and Physics, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu 241000, China; 4 Post-doctorate Research Station of Mechanical Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300384, China |
|
|
Abstract Quantum-classical correspondence is affirmed via performing Wigner function and a classical-quantum chaotic system containing random variables. The classical-quantum system is transformed into a Kolmogorov model for force and energy analysis. Combining different forces, the system is divided into two categories: conservative and non-conservative, revealing the mechanical characteristic of the classical-quantum system. The Casimir power, an analysis tool, is employed to find the key factors governing the orbital trajectory and the energy cycle of the system. Detailed analyses using the Casimir power and an energy transformation uncover the causes of the different dynamic behaviors, especially chaos. For the corresponding classical Hamiltonian system when Planck's constant ħ→0, the supremum bound of the system is derived analytically. Difference between the classical-quantum system and the classical Hamiltonian system is displayed through trajectories and energies. Quantum-classical correspondences are further demonstrated by comparing phase portrait, kinetic, potential and Casimir energies of the two systems.
|
Received: 27 October 2019
Revised: 04 December 2019
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
05.45.-a
|
(Nonlinear dynamics and chaos)
|
|
05.45.Mt
|
(Quantum chaos; semiclassical methods)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61873186 and 11902220), the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City of China (Grant No. 17JCZDJC38300), the Provincial Foundation for Excellent Young Talents of Colleges and Universities of Anhui Province of China (Grant No. GXYQ2017014), and the Anhui University Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project of China (Grant No. SK2019A0116). |
Corresponding Authors:
Guoyuan Qi
E-mail: guoyuanqisa@qq.com
|
Cite this article:
Haiyun Bi(毕海云), Guoyuan Qi(齐国元), Jianbing Hu(胡建兵), Qiliang Wu(吴启亮) Quantum-classical correspondence and mechanical analysis ofa classical-quantum chaotic system 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 020502
|
[1] |
Averin D V 2000 Fortschritte der Physik 48 1055
|
[2] |
Houck A A, Türeci H E and Koch J 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 292
|
[3] |
Xia H Y, Li H S, Zhang H, Liang Y and Xin J 2019 Quantum Inf. Process. 18 229
|
[4] |
Sheng Y B and Zhou L 2013 Entropy 15 1776
|
[5] |
Zabaleta O G and Arizmendi C M 2018 Chaos 28 075506
|
[6] |
Wilkie J and Brumer P 1997 Phys. Rev. 55 43
|
[7] |
Brack M, Bhaduri R K, Law J and Murthy M V N 1993 Phys. Rew. Lett. 70 568
|
[8] |
Hou X W and Hu B 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 042110
|
[9] |
Song L J, Wang X G, Yan D and Zong Z G 2008 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 47 2635
|
[10] |
Song L J, Yan D, Gai Y J and Wang Y B 2011 Acta. Phys. Sin. 60 073201 (in Chinese)
|
[11] |
Eckhardt B, Hose G and Pollak E 1989 Phys. Rev. A 39 3776
|
[12] |
Gong J and Brumer P 1999 Phys. Rev. E 60 1643
|
[13] |
Gong J and Brumer P 2003 Phys. Rev. A 68 062103
|
[14] |
Qi G Y, Hu J B and Wang Z 2020 Appl. Math. Model 78 350
|
[15] |
Lakshmanan M and Rajasekar S 2012 Nonlinear Dynamics-Integrability, Chaos, and Patterns (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) chap 3 p. 65
|
[16] |
Tayler J R 2005 Classical mechanics (Sausalito: University Science Books) chap 13 p. 543
|
[17] |
Shi L J and Wen Z S 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 040201
|
[18] |
Shen J, Zhang X M, Li Q L, Wang X Y, Zhao Y J and Jia Y 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 040503
|
[19] |
Alamodi A O A, Sun K H, Ai W, Chen C and Peng D 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 020503
|
[20] |
Song N, Zhang W and Yao M H 2015 Nonlinear Dyn. 82 489
|
[21] |
Xiang L, Jia Y and Hu A 2016 Appl. Math. Model 40 1
|
[22] |
Wei Z C and Zhang W 2014 Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 24 1450127
|
[23] |
Wei Z C, Zhang W and Yao M H 2015 Nonlinear Dyn. 82 1251
|
[24] |
Bi H Y, Qi G Y and Hu J B 2019 Complexity 6313925
|
[25] |
Zhang X and Wang C H 2019 IEEE Access 7 16336
|
[26] |
Zhang X, Wang C H, Yao W and Lin H R 2019 Nonlinear Dyn. 97 2159
|
[27] |
Deng Q L and Wang C H 2019 Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 29 1950117
|
[28] |
Xu Y, Gu R, Zhang H and Li D 2012 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 22 1250088
|
[29] |
Yao M H, Zhang W and Zu W J 2012 J. Sound Vib. 331 2624
|
[30] |
Wei Z C, Moroz I, Sprott J C, Wang Z and Zhang W 2017 Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 27 1730008
|
[31] |
Zhang W, Wu Q L, Yao M H and Dowell E H 2018 Nonlinear Dynam. 94 1
|
[32] |
Wu Q L, Zhang W and Dowell E H 2018 Int. J. Non-Lin. Mech. 102 25
|
[33] |
Wu Q L and Qi G Y 2019 Phys. Lett. A 383 1555
|
[34] |
Deng Q L and Wang C H 2019 Chaos 29 093112
|
[35] |
Qi G Y 2019 Nonlinear Dynam. 95 2063
|
[36] |
El-Sayed A M A, Nour H M, Elsaid A, Matouk A E and Elsonbaty A 2016 Appl. Math. Model 40 3516
|
[37] |
Pelino V, Maimone F and Pasini A 2014 Chaos Soliton Fract. 64 67
|
[38] |
Qi G Y 2017 Appl. Math. Model 51 686
|
[39] |
Qi G Y and Hu J B 2017 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 27 1750216
|
[40] |
Yang Y J and Qi G Y 2017 Chaos Soliton Fract. 108 187
|
[41] |
Qi G Y and Liang X Y 2017 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 27 1750180
|
[42] |
Qi G Y and Zhang J F 2017 Chaos Soliton Fract. 99 7
|
[43] |
Liang X Y and Qi G Y 2017 Chaos Soliton Fract. 98 173
|
[44] |
Liang X Y and Qi G Y 2017 Brazil J. Phys. 47 288
|
[45] |
Yang Y J and Qi G Y 2019 Phys. Lett. A 383 318
|
[46] |
Boulet B 2006 Fundamentals of Signals and Systems (Boston: Charles River Media) chap 5 p. 188
|
[47] |
Marsden J E and Ratiu T S 2010 Introduction to mechanics and symmetry: a basic exposition of classical mechanical systems (New York, Springer) chap 1 p. 35
|
[48] |
Shamolin M V 2010 J. Math. Sci. 165 743
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|