ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Axial magnetic field effect in numerical analysis of high power Cherenkov free electron laser |
F Bazouband1, B Maraghechi2 |
1 Department of Physics, Fasa University, Post code 74616-86131, Fasa, Iran;
2 Department of Physics, Manhattanville College, Purchase, New York 10577, USA |
|
|
Abstract Cherenkov free electron laser (CFEL) is simulated numerically by using the single particle method to optimize the electron beam. The electron beam is assumed to be moving near the surface of a flat dielectric slab along a growing radiation. The set of coupled nonlinear differential equations of motion is solved to study the electron dynamics. For three sets of parameters, in high power CFEL, it is found that an axial magnetic field is always necessary to keep the electron beam in the interaction region and its optimal strength is reported for each case. At the injection point, the electron beam's distance above the dielectric surface is kept at a minimum value so that the electrons neither hit the dielectric nor move away from it to the weaker radiation fields and out of the interaction region. The optimal electron beam radius and current are thereby calculated. This analysis is in agreement with two previous numerical studies for a cylindrical waveguide but is at odds with analytical treatments of a flat dielectric that does not use an axial magnetic field. This is backed by an interesting physical reasoning.
|
Received: 27 October 2018
Revised: 24 February 2019
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
41.60.Cr
|
(Free-electron lasers)
|
|
52.59.Rz
|
(Free-electron devices)
|
|
41.60.Bq
|
(Cherenkov radiation)
|
|
41.85.Lc
|
(Particle beam focusing and bending magnets, wiggler magnets, and quadrupoles)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
F Bazouband
E-mail: fbazooband@gmail.com
|
Cite this article:
F Bazouband, B Maraghechi Axial magnetic field effect in numerical analysis of high power Cherenkov free electron laser 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 064101
|
[1] |
Perenzoni M and Paul D J 2014 Physics and Applications of Terahertz Radiation (Springer)
|
[2] |
Weide D V D 2003 Opt. Photon. News 14 48
|
[3] |
Ciocci F, Dattoli G, De Angelis A, et al. 1987 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 259 128
|
[4] |
Ciocci F, Doria A, Gallerano G P, Giabbai I, Kimmitt M F, Messina G, Renieri A and Walsh J E 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 699
|
[5] |
Garate E, Cook R, Heim P, Layman R and Walsh J 1985 J. Appl. Phys. 58 627
|
[6] |
Garate E, Shaughnessy C and Walsh J 1987 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23 1627
|
[7] |
Garate E P, Moustaizis S, Buzzi J M, Rouille C and Lamain H 1986 Appl. Phys. Lett. 48 1326
|
[8] |
Walsh J and Murphy J 1982 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 18 1259
|
[9] |
Liu F, Xiao L, Ye Y, Wang M, Cui K, Feng X, Zhang W and Huang Y 2017 Nat. Photon. 11 289
|
[10] |
Asgekar V B and Dattoli G 2005 Opt. Commun. 255 309
|
[11] |
Ciocci F, Dattoli G, Doria A, Gallerano G P, Schettini G, Toree A E D, Auston D, Jacobs R, Bartolini R and Liao P 1987 in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, Baltimore, Maryland, OSA, USA
|
[12] |
Gallerano G P, Doria A, Giovenale E and Renieri A 1999 Infrared Phys. Technol. 40 161
|
[13] |
Kalkal Y and Kumar V 2015 Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 18 030707
|
[14] |
Wiggins S M, Jaroszynski D A, McNeil B W J, Robb G R M, Aitken P, Phelps A D R, Cross A W, Ronald K, Ginzburg N S, Shpak V G, Yalandin M I, Shunailov S A and Ulmaskulov M R 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 2393
|
[15] |
Fares H and Yamada M 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 093106
|
[16] |
Gore B W and Asgekar V B 1996 Phys. Scr. 53 62
|
[17] |
Li D, Huo G, Imasaki K, Asakawa M and Tsunawaki Y 2010 Infrared Phys. Technol. 53 204
|
[18] |
Sharma G and Mishra G 2012 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 685 35
|
[19] |
Freund H P 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 2993
|
[20] |
Freund H P and Ganguly A K 1990 Phys. Fluids B 2 2506
|
[21] |
Li D, Wang Y, Hangyo M, Wei Y Z, Yang and Miyamoto S 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 194102
|
[22] |
Wang Y, Wei Y, Li D, Takano K, Nakajima M, Jiang X, Tang X, Shi X, Gong Y, Feng J and Miyamoto S 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 083111
|
[23] |
Wang Y, Wei Y, Li D, Wanghe W, Xianbao S, Xia L, Qian L, Hairong Y, Jin X, Luqi Z, Chong D, Yubin G and Wenxiang W 2016 in IEEE International Vacuum Electronics Conference (IVEC)
|
[24] |
Kalkal Y and Kumar V 2016 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 827 85
|
[25] |
Fares H 2012 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 690 111
|
[26] |
Cao M M, Liu W X, Wang Y and Li K 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 024101
|
[27] |
Cao M M, Liu W X, Wang Y and Li K 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 014101
|
[28] |
Ye Y, Liu F, Cui K, Feng X, Zhang W and Huang Y 2018 Opt. Express 26 31402
|
[29] |
Li M, Yang X F, Xu Z, et al. 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 084102
|
[30] |
Lin X L, Zhang J B, Lu Y, Luo F, Lu S L, Yu T M and Dai Z M 2010 Chin. Phys. Lett. 27 044101
|
[31] |
Li W, Jiang S, He Z, Jia Q, Wang L and He D D 2018 in 9th International Particle Accelerator Conference, Canada, JACoW
|
[32] |
Owens I J and Brownell J H 2005 J. Appl. Phys 97 104915
|
[33] |
Weatherall J C and Main W 1992 Phys. Fluids B 4 1953
|
[34] |
Main W T, Garate E, Weatherall J C and Cherry R 1992 IEEE T. Plasma Sci. 20 281
|
[35] |
Asgekar V B and Dattoli G 2002 Opt. Commun. 206 373
|
[36] |
Fares H, Yamada M and Kuwamura Y 2010 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 49 096402
|
[37] |
de la Fuente I, van der Slot P J M and Boller K J 2007 Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 10 020702
|
[38] |
Fares H 2012 Phys. Plasmas 19 053109
|
[39] |
Kalkal Y and Kumar V 2016 Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 19 060702
|
[40] |
Yatsenko T, Ilyenko K and Sotnikov G V 2012 Phys. Plasmas 19 063107
|
[41] |
Hill N, Vaughan W, Price A H and Davies M 1969 Dielectric Properties and Molecular behaviour (London: Van Nostrand Reinhold)
|
[42] |
Freund H P and Antonsen T M 1992 Principles of free-electron laser (London: Chapman-Hall), Chap. 2
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|