INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Degradation of current-voltage and low frequency noise characteristics under negative bias illumination stress in InZnO thin film transistors |
Li Wang(王黎)1,2,3, Yuan Liu(刘远)1,2,3, Kui-Wei Geng(耿魁伟)1, Ya-Yi Chen(陈雅怡)1,2, Yun-Fei En(恩云飞)2 |
1 School of Electronic and Information Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China; 2 Science and Technology on Reliability Physics and Application of Electronic Component Laboratory, CEPREI, Guangzhou 510610, China; 3 Key Laboratory of Silicon Device Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China |
|
|
Abstract The instabilities of indium-zinc oxide thin film transistors under bias and/or illumination stress are studied in this paper. Firstly, illumination experiments are performed, which indicates the variations of current-voltage characteristics and electrical parameters (such as threshold voltage and sub-threshold swing) are dominated by the stress-induced ionized oxygen vacancies and acceptor-like states. The dependence of degradation on light wavelength is also investigated. More negative shift of threshold voltage and greater sub-threshold swing are observed with the decrease of light wavelength. Subsequently, a negative bias illumination stress experiment is carried out. The degradation of the device is aggravated due to the decrease of recombination effects between ionized oxygen vacancies and free carriers. Moreover, the contributions of ionized oxygen vacancies and acceptor-like states are separated by using the mid-gap method. In addition, ionized oxygen vacancies are partially recombined at room temperature and fully recombined at high temperature. Finally, low-frequency noise is measured before and after negative bias illumination stress. Experimental results show few variations of the oxide trapped charges are generated during stress, which is consistent with the proposed mechanism.
|
Received: 12 December 2017
Revised: 19 January 2018
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
85.30.Tv
|
(Field effect devices)
|
|
73.40.Qv
|
(Metal-insulator-semiconductor structures (including semiconductor-to-insulator))
|
|
71.23.Cq
|
(Amorphous semiconductors, metallic glasses, glasses)
|
|
73.50.Dn
|
(Low-field transport and mobility; piezoresistance)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the Opening Fund of Key Laboratory of Silicon Device Technology,Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No.KLSDTJJ2018-6),the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.61574048),the Science and Technology Research Project of Guangdong Province,China (Grant No.2015B090912002),and the Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou City,China (Grant No.201710010172). |
Corresponding Authors:
Yuan Liu
E-mail: Liuyuan@ceprei.com
|
Cite this article:
Li Wang(王黎), Yuan Liu(刘远), Kui-Wei Geng(耿魁伟), Ya-Yi Chen(陈雅怡), Yun-Fei En(恩云飞) Degradation of current-voltage and low frequency noise characteristics under negative bias illumination stress in InZnO thin film transistors 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 068504
|
[1] |
Lan L, Xiong N, Xiao P, Li M, Xu H, Yao R and Wen Sand Peng J 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 242102
|
[2] |
Fortunato E, Barquinha P and and Martins R 2012 Adv. Mater. 24 2945
|
[3] |
Lee K H, Ji S J, Son K S and Park J S 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 1309
|
[4] |
Tang L F, Lu H and Ren F 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 038502
|
[5] |
Huang X, Wu C, Lu H and Ren F 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 243505
|
[6] |
Chang G W, Chang T C, Jhu J C and Tsai T M 2014 IEEE Electron. Dev. Lett. 61 2119
|
[7] |
Nomura K, Kamiya T, Hirano M and and Hosono H 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 013502
|
[8] |
Chowdhury M D H, Migliorato P and and Jang J 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 153511
|
[9] |
Chowdhury M D H, Ryu S H, Migliorato P and and Jang J 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 110 114503
|
[10] |
Chen T C, Chang T C, Hsieh T Y, Tsai C T, Chen S C, Lin C S, Jian F Y and Tsai M Y 2011 Thin Solid Films 520 1422
|
[11] |
Nomura K, Kamiya T and Hosono H 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 488
|
[12] |
Gwang Um J, Mativenga M, Migliorato P and Jang J 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 468
|
[13] |
Oh H, Yoon S, Ryu M K, Hwang C, Yang S and Park S K 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 488
|
[14] |
Migliorato P, Md D H C, Gwang Um J and Seok M 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 2945
|
[15] |
Tseng Y C, Huang W M, Spears E, Spooner D, Ngo D and Ford J M 2002 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 20 54
|
[16] |
Fung T C, Baek G and Kanicki J 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 074518
|
[17] |
Liu Y, Chen R S, Li B, En Y F and Chen Y Q 2018 IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 65 356
|
[18] |
Kim H, Choi D, Park S, Park K, Park H W, Chung K B and Kwon J Y 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 232104
|
[19] |
Liu L, Mei Z, Tang A, Azarov A, Kuznetsov K, Xue Q K and Du X 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 235305
|
[20] |
Nomura K, Kamiya T, Yanagi H, Ikenaga E, Yang K, Kobayashi K, Hirano M and Hosono H 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 202117
|
[21] |
Fung T C, Back G and Kanicki 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 074518
|
[22] |
Billah M M, Chowdhury M D H, Mativenga M, Um J G, Mruthyunjaya R K and Heiler G N 2016 IEEE Electron. Dev. Lett. 37 735
|
[23] |
Kamiya T, Nomura K and and Hosono H 2009 Phys. Status Solidi A 206 860
|
[24] |
Kamiya T, Nomura K, Hirano M and Hosono H 2008 Phys. Status Solidi C 5 3098
|
[25] |
Ryu B, Noh H K, Choi E A and Chang K J 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 022108
|
[26] |
Ji K H, Kim J I, Jung H Y, Park S Y, Choi R, Mo Y G and Jeong J K 2011 Microelectronic Engineering 88 1412
|
[27] |
Kim J H, Kim U K, Chung Y J, Ji S J, et al. 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 488
|
[28] |
Kim Y, Kim S, Kim W, Bae M, Jeong H K, Kong D, Choi S, Kim D M and Kim D H 2012 IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 59 2699
|
[29] |
Nomura K, Kamiya T and Hosono H 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 053505
|
[30] |
McWhorter P J and Winokur P S 1986 Appl. Phys. Lett. 48 133
|
[31] |
Kouvatsos D N, Davidovic V, Papaioannou G J, Stojadinovic N, Michalas L, Exarchos M, Voutsas A T and Goustoridis D 2004 Microelectronics Reliability 44 1631
|
[32] |
Loannidis E G, Tsormpatzoglou A and Tassos D H 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 106103
|
[33] |
Chen W T, Lo S Y, Kao S C, Zan H W, Tsai C C, Lin J H, Fang C H and Lee C C 2011 IEEE Electron. Dev. Lett. 32 1552
|
[34] |
Liu Y, Wu W J, Qiang Lei, Wang L, En Y F and Li B 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 088506
|
[35] |
Hung K K, Ko P K, Hu C and Cheng Y C 1990 IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 37 654
|
[36] |
Liu Y, Wu W J, Li B, En Y F, Wang L and Liu Y R 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 098503 (in Chinese)
|
[37] |
Ioannidis E G, Tsormpatzoglou A, Tassis D H, Dimitriadis C A, Templier F and Kamarinos G 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 106103
|
[38] |
Tsormpatzoglou A, As N, Mahmoudabadi F, Choi N, Hatalis M K and Dimitriadis C A 2013 IEEE Electron. Dev. Lett. 34 1403
|
[39] |
Liu Y, Chen H B, Liu Y R, Wang X, En Y F, Li B and Lu Y D 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 088503
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|