|
|
Decoy-state reference-frame-independent quantum key distribution with both source errors and statistical fluctuations |
Kang Liu(刘康)1,2, Jian Li(李剑)1,3, Jian-Rong Zhu(朱建荣)1,2, Chun-Mei Zhang(张春梅)1,2, Qin Wang(王琴)1,2 |
1. Institute of Signal Processing Transmission, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Broadband Wireless Communication and Sensor Network Technology of the Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China; 3. Department of Physics, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China |
|
|
Abstract Reference-frame-independent quantum key distribution (RFI QKD) can generate secret keys without the alignment of reference frames, which is very robust in real-life implementations of QKD systems. However, the performance of decoy-state RFI QKD with both source errors and statistical fluctuations is still missing until now. In this paper, we investigate the performance of decoy-state RFI QKD in practical scenarios with two kinds of light sources, the heralded single photon source (HSPS) and the weak coherent source (WCS), and also give clear comparison results of decoy-state RFI QKD with WCS and HSPS. Simulation results show that the secret key rates of decoy-state RFI QKD with WCS are higher than those with HSPS in short distance range, but the secret key rates of RFI QKD with HSPS outperform those with WCS in long distance range.
|
Received: 06 April 2017
Revised: 02 June 2017
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.67.Dd
|
(Quantum cryptography and communication security)
|
|
03.67.Hk
|
(Quantum communication)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0304100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61475197, 61590932, 11774180, and 61705110), the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (Grant Nos. 15KJA120002 and 17KJB140016), the Outstanding Youth Project of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. BK20150039), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. BK20170902), and the Science Fund from the Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China (Grant No. NY217006). |
Corresponding Authors:
Chun-Mei Zhang, Chun-Mei Zhang
E-mail: cmz@njupt.edu.cn;qinw@njupt.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Kang Liu(刘康), Jian Li(李剑), Jian-Rong Zhu(朱建荣), Chun-Mei Zhang(张春梅), Qin Wang(王琴) Decoy-state reference-frame-independent quantum key distribution with both source errors and statistical fluctuations 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 120302
|
[1] |
Bennett C H, Brassard G 1984 Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing, pp. 175-79
|
[2] |
Shor P W and Preskill J 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 441
|
[3] |
Zhao Y, Qi B, Ma X, Lo H K and Qian L 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 070502
|
[4] |
Peng C Z, Zhang J, Yang D, Gao W B, Ma H X, Yin H and Pan J W 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 010505
|
[5] |
Rosenberg D, Harrington J W, Rice P R, Hiskett P A, Peterson C G, Hughes R J and Nordholt J E 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 010503
|
[6] |
Schmitt M T, Weier H, Fürst M, Ursin R, Tiefenbacher F, Scheidl T and Zeilinger A 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 010504
|
[7] |
Zhao Y, Qi B, Ma X, Lo H K and Qian L 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 070502
|
[8] |
Yuan Z L, Sharpe A W and Shields A J 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 011118
|
[9] |
Yin Z Q, Han Z F, Chen W, Xu F X, Wu Q L and Guo G C 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 3547
|
[10] |
Fröhlich B and Yuan Z L 2015 Nat. Photon. 9 781
|
[11] |
Wang S, Chen W and Yin Z Q 2014 Opt. Express 22 21739
|
[12] |
Wang S, Chen W and Guo J F 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 1008
|
[13] |
Li F Y, Wang D, Wang S, Li M, Yin Z Q, Li H W, Chen W and Han Z F 2014 Chin. Phys. B. 23 124201
|
[14] |
Zhang Y, Wang S, Yin Z Q, Chen W, Liang W Y, Li H W, Guo G C and Han Z F 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 100307
|
[15] |
He D Y, Wang S and Chen W 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 111104
|
[16] |
Laing A, Scarani V, Rarity J G and O'Brien J L 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 012304
|
[17] |
Wang C, Sun S H, Ma X C, Tang G Z and Liang L M 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 042319
|
[18] |
Yin Z Q, Wang S, Chen W, Li H W, Guo G C and Han Z F 2014 Quantum Inf. Process. 13 1237
|
[19] |
Zhang C M, Zhu J R and Wang Q 2017 Phys. Rev. A. 95 032309
|
[20] |
Liang W Y, Wang S, Li H W, Yin Z Q, Chen W, Yao Y and Han Z F 2014 Sci. Rep. 4 3617
|
[21] |
Wang C, Song X T, Yin Z Q, Wang S, Chen W, Zhang C M, Guo G C and Han Z F 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 160502
|
[22] |
Zhang P, Aungskunsiri K, Martín-López E, Wabnig J, Lobino M, Nock R W and Laing A 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 130501
|
[23] |
Wabnig J, Bitauld D, Li H W, Laing A, O'Brien, J L and Niskanen A O 2013 New J. Phys. 15 073001
|
[24] |
Hwang W Y 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 057901
|
[25] |
Wang X B 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230503
|
[26] |
Lo H K, Ma X and Chen K 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230504
|
[27] |
Wang Q, Wang X B and Guo G C 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 012312
|
[28] |
Wang Q, Wang X B, Björk G and Karlsson A 2007 Europhys. Lett. 79 40001
|
[29] |
Huttner B, Imoto N, Gisin N and Mor T 1995 Phys. Rev. A 51 1863
|
[30] |
Brassard G, Lütkenhaus N, Mor T and Sanders B C 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 1330
|
[31] |
Bruss D 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 3018
|
[32] |
Zhou Y H, Yu Z W and Wang X B 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 052325
|
[33] |
Wang X B, Peng C Z and Zhang J 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 042311
|
[34] |
Wang X B, Yang L, Peng C Z and Pan J C 2009 New J. Phys. 11 075006
|
[35] |
Wang S, Zhang S L, Li H W, Yin Z Q, Zhao Y B, Chen W, Han Z F and Guo G C 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 062309
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|