INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Improvement and error analysis of quantitative information extraction in diffraction-enhanced imaging |
Yang Hao (杨浩), Xuan Rui-Jiao (轩瑞娇), Hu Chun-Hong (胡春红), Duan Jing-Hao (段敬豪) |
College of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China |
|
|
Abstract Diffraction-enhanced imaging (DEI) is a powerful phase-sensitive technique that provides higher spatial resolution and supercontrast of weakly absorbing objects than conventional radiography. It derives contrast from the X-ray absorption, refraction, and ultra-small-angle X-ray scattering (USAXS) properties of an object. The separation of different-contrast contributions from images is an important issue for the potential application of DEI. In this paper, an improved DEI (IDEI) method is proposed based on the Gaussian curve fitting of the rocking curve (RC). Utilizing only three input images, the IDEI method can accurately separate the absorption, refraction, and USAXS contrasts produced by the object. The IDEI method can therefore be viewed as an improvement to the extended DEI (EDEI) method. In contrast, the IDEI method can circumvent the limitations of the EDEI method well since it does not impose a Taylor approximation on the RC. Additionally, analysis of the IDEI model errors is performed to further investigate the factors that lead to the image artifacts, and finally validation studies are conducted using computer simulation and synchrotron experimental data.
|
Received: 21 May 2013
Revised: 24 August 2013
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
87.59.-e
|
(X-ray imaging)
|
|
87.64.mh
|
(Phase contrast and DIC)
|
|
42.30.Rx
|
(Phase retrieval)
|
|
41.60.Ap
|
(Synchrotron radiation)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 30900333 and 81371549) and the WBE Liver Fibrosis Foundation, China (Grant No. CFHPC20131033). |
Corresponding Authors:
Hu Chun-Hong
E-mail: chunhong_hu@hotmail.com
|
About author: 87.59.-e; 87.64.mh; 42.30.Rx; 41.60.Ap |
Cite this article:
Yang Hao (杨浩), Xuan Rui-Jiao (轩瑞娇), Hu Chun-Hong (胡春红), Duan Jing-Hao (段敬豪) Improvement and error analysis of quantitative information extraction in diffraction-enhanced imaging 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 048701
|
[1] |
Momose A, Takeda T, Itai Y and Hirano K 1996 Nat. Med. 2 473
|
[2] |
Davis T J, Gao D, Gureyev T E, Stevenson A W and Wilkins S W 1995 Nature 373 595
|
[3] |
Wilkins S W, Gureyev T E, Gao D, Pogany A and Stevenson A W 1996 Nature 384 335
|
[4] |
Pfeiffer F, Weitkamp T, Bunk O and David C 2006 Nat. Phys. 2 258
|
[5] |
Liu X S, Li E R, Zhu P P, Liu Y J, Zhang K, Wang Z L, Hong Y L, Zhang H T, Yuan Q X, Huang W X and Wu Z Y 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 040701
|
[6] |
Liu X, Guo J C and Niu H B 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 070701
|
[7] |
Lei Y H, Liu X, Guo J C, Zhao Z G and Niu H B 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 042901
|
[8] |
Chapman D, Thomlinson W, Johnston R E, Washburn D, Pisano E, Gmür N, Zhong Z, Menk R H, Arfelli F and Sayers D 1997 Phys. Med. Biol. 42 2015
|
[9] |
Zhu P P, Yuan Q X, Huang W X, Wang Y, Shu H, Wu Z Y and Xian D C 2006 Acta Phys. Sin. 55 1089 (in Chinese)
|
[10] |
Wernick M N, Wirjadi O, Chapman D, Zhong Z, Galatsanos N P, Yang Y Y, Brankov J G, Oltulu O, Anastasio M A and Muehleman C 2003 Phys. Med. Biol. 48 3875
|
[11] |
Oltulu O, Zhong Z, Hasnah M O, Wernick M N and Chapman D 2003 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 2152
|
[12] |
Pagot E, Cloetens P, Fiedler S, Bravin A, Coan P, Baruchel J, Härtwig J and Thomlinson W 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 3421
|
[13] |
Brankov J G, Wernick M N, Yang Y Y, Li J, Muehleman C, Zhong Z and Anastasio M A 2006 Med. Phys. 33 278
|
[14] |
Rigon L, Arfelli F and Menk R H 2007 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 3077
|
[15] |
Chou C Y, Anastasio M A, Brankov J G, Wernick M N, Brey E M, Connor D M and Zhong Z 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 1923
|
[16] |
Maksimenko A 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 154106
|
[17] |
Huang Z F, Kang K J and Yang Y G 2007 Nucl. Instrum. Method A 579 218
|
[18] |
Hu C H, Zhang L, Li H and Luo S Q 2008 Opt. Express 16 16704
|
[19] |
Hu C H, Li H, Zhang L, Wang X Y and Luo S Q 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 2423 (in Chinese)
|
[20] |
Diemoz P C, Coan P, Glaser C and Bravin A 2010 Opt. Express 18 3494
|
[21] |
Chen Z Q, Ding F, Huang Z F, Zhang L, Yin H X, Wang Z C and Zhu P P 2009 Chin. Phys. C 33 969
|
[22] |
Muehleman C, Li J, Zhong Z, Brankov J G and Wernick M N 2006 J. Anat. 208 115
|
[23] |
Hu C H, Zhao T, Zhang L, Li H, Zhao X Y and Luo S Q 2009 Prog. Nat. Sci. 19 955
|
[24] |
Zhang X, Yuan Q X, Yang X R, Li H Q, Chen Y, Chen S L, Zhu P P and Huang W X 2009 Chin. Phys. C 33 986
|
[25] |
Tan G, Wang H Q, Chen Y, Yuan Q X, Li G, Zhang X D, Zhu P P, Zhong X F and Tang J T 2010 Chin. Phys. C 34 237
|
[26] |
Muehleman C, Fogarty D, Reinhart B, Tzvetkov T, Li J and Nesch I 2010 Clin. Anat. 23 530
|
[27] |
Appel A A, Larson J C, Somo S, Zhong Z, Spicer P P, Kasper F K, Garson A B, Zysk A M, Mikos A G, Anastasio M A and Brey E M 2012 Tissue Engineering Part. C: Method 18 859
|
[28] |
Appel A A, Chou C Y, Greisler H P, Larson J C, Vasireddi S, Zhong Z, Anastasio M A and Brey E M 2012 Am. J. Surg. 204 631
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|