|
|
Exact solution of entanglement of the double Jaynes–Cummings model without rotating wave approximation |
Ren Xue-Zao(任学藻)†, Jiang Dao-Lai(姜道来), Cong Hong-Lu(丛红璐), and Li Lei(黎雷) |
School of Science, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China |
|
|
Abstract This paper investigates the influences of atom–field coupling and dipole–dipole coupling for atoms on the entanglement between two atoms by means of concurrence. The results show that the sudden death occurs when the atom–field coupling is strong enough, and the collapse and the revival appear when the dipole–dipole interaction is strong enough.
|
Received: 12 September 2009
Revised: 16 January 2010
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the China Academy of Engineering Physics(Grant No. 1097602/A06). |
Cite this article:
Ren Xue-Zao(任学藻), Jiang Dao-Lai(姜道来), Cong Hong-Lu(丛红璐), and Li Lei(黎雷) Exact solution of entanglement of the double Jaynes–Cummings model without rotating wave approximation 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 090309
|
[1] |
Nielsen M A and Chuang I L 2000 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge: Cambridge Uni. Press)
|
[2] |
Ekert A and Jozsa R 1996 Rev. Mod. Phys. 68 733
|
[3] |
Bennett C H, Brassard G, Crépeauc, Jozsa R, Peres A and Wootters W K 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895
|
[4] |
Ekert A 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 661
|
[5] |
Gisin N, Ribordy G, Tittel W and Zbinden H 2002 Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 145
|
[6] |
Knill E, Laflamme R and Milburn G L 2001 Nature 409 46
|
[7] |
Isabel Sainz and Gunnar Bjõrk 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 042313
|
[8] |
Stanley Chan, Reid M D and Ficek Z 2009 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. 42 065507
|
[9] |
Muhammed Yõnac, Ting Yu and Eberly J H 2006 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. 39 621
|
[10] |
Li Y L and Li X M 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 812
|
[11] |
Liao X P, Fang M F, Cai J W and Zheng X J 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 2137
|
[12] |
Chen L, Shao X Q and Zhang S 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 888
|
[13] |
Sornborger A T, Cleland A N and Geller M R 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 052315
|
[14] |
Armour A D, Blencowe M P and Schwab K C 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 148301
|
[15] |
Anappara A A, Liberato S D, Tredicucci A, Ciuti C, Biasiol G, Sorba L and Beltram F 2009 arXiv:0808.3720v3 [quant-ph]
|
[16] |
Chen Q H, Zhang Y Y, Liu T and Wang K L 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 051801
|
[17] |
Liu T, Zhang Y Y, Chen Q H and Wang K L 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 023801
|
[18] |
Liu T, Wang K L and Feng M 2007 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40 1967
|
[19] |
Liu T, Feng M and Wang K L 2007 Commun. Theor. Phys. bf 47 561
|
[20] |
Liu T, Fan Y X, Huang S W, Wang K L and Wang Y 2007 it Commun. Theor. Phys. 47 791
|
[21] |
Fan Y X, Liu T, Feng M and Wang K L 2007 Commun. Theor. Phys. 47 781
|
[22] |
Ren X Z, Jiang D L, Cong H L and Liao X 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 5406 (in Chinese)
|
[23] |
Wootters W K 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 2245
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|