|
Special Issue:
SPECIAL TOPIC — Optical field manipulation
|
| SPECIAL TOPIC—Optical field manipulation |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Impact of the spatial coherence on self-interference digital holography |
| Xingbing Chao(潮兴兵)1,4, Yuan Gao(高源)1, Jianping Ding(丁剑平)1,2,3,†, and Hui-Tian Wang(王慧田)1,2 |
1 National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures and School of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
2 Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
3 Collaborative Innovation Center of Solid-State Lighting and Energy-Saving Electronics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
4 College of Science, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang 332005, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Owing to the unique feature that the signal and reference waves of self-interference digital holography (SIDH) contain the same spatial information from the same point of object, compared with conventional digital holography, the SIDH has the special spatial coherence properties. We present a statistical optics approach to analyzing the formation of cross-correlation image in SIDH. Our study reveals that the spatial coherence of illumination light can greatly influence the imaging characteristics of SIDH, and the impact extent of the spatial coherence depends substantially on the recording distance of hologram. The theoretical conclusions are supported well by numerical simulation and optical experiments.
|
Received: 30 October 2020
Revised: 16 December 2020
Accepted manuscript online: 30 December 2020
|
|
PACS:
|
42.40.-i
|
(Holography)
|
| |
42.30.-d
|
(Imaging and optical processing)
|
| |
42.25.Hz
|
(Interference)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91750202, 91750114, and 11922406), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2018YFA0306200 and 2017YFA0303700), and the Science and Technology Project of Jiangxi Provincial Education Department, China (Grant No. GJJ190915). |
Corresponding Authors:
Jianping Ding
E-mail: jpding@nju.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xingbing Chao(潮兴兵), Yuan Gao(高源), Jianping Ding(丁剑平), and Hui-Tian Wang(王慧田) Impact of the spatial coherence on self-interference digital holography 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 084212
|
[1] Osten W, Faridian A, Gao P, Körner K, Naik D, Pedrini G, Singh A K, Takeda M and Wilke M 2014 Appl. Opt. 53 G44
[2] Kreis T 2016 IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat. 12 240
[3] Kelner R and Rosen J 2015 IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat. 12 220
[4] Gao H Y, Yao Q X, Pan L, Zheng Z Q, Liu J C, Zheng H D, Zeng C, Yu Y J, Sun T and Zeng Z X 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 094203
[5] Hong J and Kim M K 2013 J. Europ. Opt. Soc. Rap. Public. 8 13077
[6] Kihong C, Junkyu Y, Seunghwi Y and Sung-Wook M 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 3940
[7] Rosen J, Anand V, Kumar M, Ratnam M and Mukherjee S 2019 Adv. Opt. Photon. 11 1
[8] Kim and Myung K 2013 Opt. Express 21 9636
[9] Rosen J and Brooker G 2008 Nat. Photon. 2 190
[10] Yanagawa T, Abe R and Hayasaki Y 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 3312
[11] Siegel N, Lupashin V, Storrie B and Brooker G 2016 Nat. Photon. 10 802
[12] Man T, Wan Y, Wu F and Wang D 2017 Appl. Opt. 56 F91
[13] Kim M K 2013 Appl. Opt. 52 A117
[14] Man T L, Wan Y H, Yan W J, Wang X H, Peterman E J G and Wang D Y 2018 Biomed. Opt. Express 9 2614
[15] Katz O, Heidmann P, Fink M and Gigan S 2014 Nat. Photon. 8 784
[16] Nick A, Grace K, Reinhard H, Ben M, Emrah B, Ren N and Laura W 2018 Optica 5 1
[17] Hong J and Kim M K 2013 Opt. Lett. 38 5196
[18] Liang D, Zhang Q, Wang J and Liu J 2020 J. Mod. Opt. 67 92
[19] Weng J W, Clark D C and Kim M K 2016 Opt. Commun. 366 88
[20] Tang M Y, Wu M T, Zang R H, Rong T D, Du Y L, Ma F Y, Duan Z Y and Gong Q X 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 104204 (in Chinese)
[21] Bouchal P, Kapitán J, Chmelík R and Bouchal Z 2011 Opt. Express 19 15603
[22] Wan Y H, Man T L, Chen H, Jiang Z Q and Wang D Y 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 44203
[23] Chao X B, Pan L P, Wang Z S, Yang F T and Ding J P 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 064203 (in Chinese)
[24] Goodman J W 2015 Statistical optics, 2nd edn. (John Wiley & Sons) pp. 152-219
[25] Liang M D, Chen L, Hu Y H, Lin W T and Chen Y H 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 104202
[26] Mandel L and Wolf E 1995 Optical coherence and quantum optics (Cambridge University Press) pp. 128-141, p. 189
[27] Xia X Y and Xia J 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 094204
[28] Rosen J and Brooker G 2007 Opt. Lett. 32 912
[29] Wang F, Liu X and Cai Y 2015 Prog. Electromagn. Res. 150 123
[30] Guo C S, Xie Y Y and Sha B 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 2338
[31] Pang Z H and Zhao D M 2019 Opt. Lett. 44 4889
[32] Sun P C and Leith E N 1994 Appl. Opt. 33 597 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
