| INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Inhibitory effect of Relatlimab on LAG3-FGL1 interaction investigated by molecular dynamics simulation |
| Qing Xie(谢晴), Xue-Feng Liu(刘雪峰)†, Yu-Qing Wang(王雨晴), and Chen-Xiang Wang(王辰祥) |
| College of Physics, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As immunotherapy becomes increasingly integrated into cancer treatment, LAG3 (lymphocyte activation gene 3) has been recognized as an immune checkpoint that plays an important role in tumor immune evasion. FGL1 (fibrinogen-like protein 1) has been identified as a ligand of LAG3 that mediates immunosuppressive effects through their interaction. While experimental evidence suggests that Relatlimab can block this interaction, the underlying molecular mechanism remains poorly understood. To investigate this, we performed molecular dynamics simulations to analyze the LAG3/FGL1 complex and its interaction with Relatlimab. Our results demonstrate that Relatlimab binding destabilizes the LAG3/FGL1 complex by inducing conformational changes, thereby weakening the overall interaction. Further analysis of key residues reveals that Relatlimab disrupts the LAG3/FGL1 binding, particularly affecting the ARG residues of LAG3 and the GLU and ASP residues of FGL1. These findings provide new insights into the mechanism by which Relatlimab inhibits immune evasion, offering potential for modulating the structure and stability of the LAG3/FGL1 complex. Additionally, we investigated the effect of Favezelimab on the LAG3/FGL1 interaction and observed an effect similar to that of Relatlimab. This study advances our understanding of the roles of Relatlimab and Favezelimab in regulating immune responses and provides valuable theoretical support for the development of cancer therapies targeting the LAG3 signaling pathway.
|
Received: 28 April 2025
Revised: 26 August 2025
Accepted manuscript online: 04 September 2025
|
|
PACS:
|
87.15.ap
|
(Molecular dynamics simulation)
|
| |
87.15.km
|
(Protein-protein interactions)
|
| |
87.15.H-
|
(Dynamics of biomolecules)
|
| |
87.19.xw
|
(Immune system diseases)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11904036). |
Corresponding Authors:
Xue-Feng Liu
E-mail: liuxuefeng17@cdut.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Qing Xie(谢晴), Xue-Feng Liu(刘雪峰), Yu-Qing Wang(王雨晴), and Chen-Xiang Wang(王辰祥) Inhibitory effect of Relatlimab on LAG3-FGL1 interaction investigated by molecular dynamics simulation 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 048701
|
[1] Vafaei S, Zekiy A O, Khanamir R A, Zaman B A, Ghayourvahdat A, Azimizonuzi H and Zamani M 2022 Cancer Cell International 22 1 [2] Mellman I, Coukos G and Dranoff G 2011 Nature 480 480 [3] Schuster M, Nechansky A and Kircheis R 2006 Biotechnology Journal: Healthcare Nutrition Technology 1 138 [4] Rotte A 2019 Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 38 255 [5] Abdel-Rahman S A, Rehman A U and Gabr M T 2023 ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 14 629 [6] Hao C, Tian J, Liu H, Li F, Niu H and Zhu B 2017 Medicine 96 e7325 [7] Indini A, Di Guardo L, Cimminiello C, Prisciandaro M, Randon G, De Braud F and Del Vecchio M 2019 Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 145 511 [8] Kreidieh F and Tawbi H 2023 Therapeutic advances in medical oncology 15 17588359231186028 [9] Guy C, Mitrea D M, Chou P C, Temirov J, Vignali K M, Liu X, Zhang H, Kriwacki R, Bruchez M P and Watkins S C 2022 Nature Immunology 23 757 [10] Woo S R, Turnis M E, Goldberg M V, Bankoti J, Selby M, Nirschl C J, BettiniML, Gravano D M, Vogel P and Liu C L 2012 Cancer Research 72 917 [11] Triebel F, Jitsukawa S, Baixeras E, Roman-Roman S, Genevee C, Viegas-Pequignot E and Hercend T 1990 The Journal of Experimental Medicine 171 1393 [12] Liang B,Workman C, Lee J, Chew C, Dale B M, Colonna L, Flores M, Li N, Schweighoffer E and Greenberg S 2008 The Journal of Immunology 180 5916 [13] Wang J, Sanmamed M F, Datar I, Su T T, Ji L, Sun J, Chen L, Chen Y, Zhu G and Yin W 2019 Cell 176 334 [14] Hofmann M, Thimme R and Schamel W W 2024 Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 9 291 [15] Cillo A R, Cardello C, Shan F, Karapetyan L, Kunning S, Sander C, Rush E, Karunamurthy A, Massa R C and Rohatgi A 2024 Cell 187 4373 [16] Thudium K, Selby M, Zorn J, Rak G, Wang X, Bunch R, Hogan J, Strop P and Korman A 2022 Drugs 82 1 [17] Garralda E, Sukari A, Lakhani N, Patnaik A, Lou Y, Im S A, Golan T, Geva R, Wermke M and De Miguel M 2022 ESMO Open 7 100639 [18] Liu T Y, Yan J S, Li X, Xu L, Hao J L, Zhao S Y, Hu Q L, Na F J, Li H M and Zhao Y 2024 Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 43 213 [19] Chen J, Wu L and Li Y 2024 Biomarker Research 12 53 [20] Li J J, Wang J H, Tian T, Liu J, Zheng Y Q, Mo H Y, Sheng H, Chen Y X, Wu Q N and Han Y 2023 Nat. Commun. 14 6690 [21] Shi A P, Tang X Y, Xiong Y L, Zheng K F, Liu Y J, Shi X G, Lv Y, Jiang T, Ma N and Zhao J B 2022 Frontiers in immunology 12 785091 [22] Qian Y, Sun Y, Shi P, Zhou X, Zhang Q, Dong Q, Jin S, Qiu L, Niu X and Zhou X 2024 Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 14 1150 [23] Su J, Fu Y, Cui Z, Abidin Z, Yuan J, Zhang X, Li R and Zhao C 2024 Frontiers in Pharmacology 14 1349081 [24] Timmerman J, Lavie D, Johnson N A, Avigdor A, Borchmann P, Andreadis C, Bazargan A, Gregory G P, Keane C and Tzoran I 2023 Blood 142 4440 [25] Burley S K, Berman H M, Bhikadiya C, Bi C, Chen L, Di Costanzo L, Christie C, Dalenberg K, Duarte J M and Dutta S 2019 Nucleic Acids Research 47 D464 [26] Cheng T M K, Blundell T L and Fernandez-Recio J 2007 Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics 68 503 [27] Ming Q, Celias D P,Wu C, Cole A R, Singh S, Mason C, Dong S, Tran T H, Amarasinghe G K and Ruffell B 2022 Nat. Immunology 23 1031 [28] Lovell S C, Davis I W, Arendall III W B, De Bakker P I, Word J M, PrisantMG, Richardson J S and Richardson D C 2003 Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics 50 437 [29] Laskowski R A, MacArthur M W, Moss D S and Thornton J M 1993 Applied Crystallography 26 283 [30] Morris A L, MacArthur M W, Hutchinson E G and Thornton J M 1992 Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics 12 345 [31] Schmid N, Eichenberger A P, Choutko A, Riniker S, Winger M, Mark A E and Van GunsterenWF 2011 European Biophysics Journal 40 843 [32] Zhang B W, Zhang B Q, Shao Z G and Wu X 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 118102 [33] Toukmaji A Y and Board Jr J A 1996 Comput. Phys. Commun. 95 73 [34] Berendsen H J, Postma J V, Van Gunsteren W F, DiNola A and Haak J R 1984 J. Chem. Phys. 81 3684 [35] Martonák R, Laio A and Parrinello M 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 075503 [36] Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen H J and Fraaije J G 1997 J. Comput. Chem. 18 1463 [37] Sethi A, Eargle J, Black A A and Luthey-Schulten Z 2009 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 6620 [38] Grant B J, Rodrigues A P, ElSawy K M, McCammon J A and Caves L S 2006 Bioinformatics 22 2695 [39] dos Santos Nascimento I J, De Souza M, Medeiros D C and de Moura R O 2022 Medical Sciences Forum 14 84 [40] Poli G, Granchi C, Rizzolio F and Tuccinardi T 2020 Molecules 25 1971 [41] Kumari R, Kumar R, Consortium O S D D and Lynn A 2014 Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 54 1951 [42] Ho B K and Brasseur R 2005 BMC Structural Biology 5 1 [43] Hollingsworth S A and Dror R O 2018 Neuron 99 1129 [44] Michaud-Agrawal N, Denning E J,Woolf T B and Beckstein O 2011 J. Comput. Chem. 32 2319 [45] Wang H, Song L, Zhou T, Zeng C, Jia Y and Zhao Y 2020 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 25474 [46] Tuccinardi T 2021 Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 16 1233 [47] Ibrahim R, Saleh K, Chahine C, Khoury R, Khalife N and Cesne A L 2023 Biomedicines 11 1878 [48] Tawbi H A, Schadendorf D, Lipson E J, Ascierto P A, Matamala L, Castillo Gutiérrez E, Rutkowski P, Gogas H J, Lao C D and De Menezes J J 2022 New England Journal of Medicine 386 24 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|