|
|
Phase behavior and percolation in an equilibrium system of symmetrically interacting Janus disks on the triangular lattice |
Xixian Zhang(张希贤)1,2 and Hao Hu(胡皓)1,† |
1. School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China; 2. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China |
|
|
Abstract A Janus particle has two distinct areas on its surface. Denoting the two areas as P (patch) and N (nonpatch), when two particles come close to each other, the strength of the PP interaction is usually different from that of the NN interaction. Recently the interplay between a rotational-symmetry-breaking continuous phase transition and percolation has been explored for an equilibrium system of asymmetrically interacting (i.e., attractive PP interaction, zero NN and PN interactions) Janus disks on the triangular lattice. By Monte Carlo simulation and finite-size scaling analysis, in this work we study an equilibrium system of symmetrically interacting (i.e., attractive PP and NN interactions with the same strength, zero PN interaction) Janus disks on the same lattice. By definition, the phase diagram in the T-θ plane is symmetric for systems with patch sizes θ below and above 90°. We determine the phase diagram and compare it with that of the asymmetric system. Similar to the latter system, for 60° < θ < 90°, a rotational-symmetry-breaking continuous phase transition and an anisotropic percolation transition are found in the symmetric system, though the transition points in the two systems are quite different. Phase crossover curves are found to be different, e.g., a continuous varying crossover line extends between θ=0° and 90° for the symmetric model; and in the range 0° < θ ≤ 30°, along the crossover lines of the two models, the trends of 1/T vs. θ are opposite in the two systems. We understand the latter by analytically solving the models with two particles in 0° < θ ≤ 30°. These results are helpful for understanding close-packed systems of Janus disks with more complex interactions.
|
Received: 02 January 2023
Revised: 06 March 2023
Accepted manuscript online: 28 March 2023
|
PACS:
|
05.70.Fh
|
(Phase transitions: general studies)
|
|
05.10.Ln
|
(Monte Carlo methods)
|
|
82.70.Dd
|
(Colloids)
|
|
64.60.ah
|
(Percolation)
|
|
Fund: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.11905001). |
Corresponding Authors:
Hao Hu
E-mail: huhao@ahu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xixian Zhang(张希贤) and Hao Hu(胡皓) Phase behavior and percolation in an equilibrium system of symmetrically interacting Janus disks on the triangular lattice 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 080502
|
[1] Casagrande C and Veyssié M 1988 C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) II-306 1423 [2] Casagrande C, Fabre P, Raphal E and Veyssié M 1989 Europhys. Lett. 9 251 [3] Lahann J 2011 Small 7 1149 [4] Zhang J, Grzybowski B A and Granick S 2017 Langmuir 33 6964 [5] Kirillova A, Marschelke C and Synytska A 2019 ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 9643 [6] Zhang X, Fu Q, Duan H, Song J and Yang H 2021 ACS Nano 15 6147 [7] Chen Q, Bae S C and Granick S 2011 Nature 469 381 [8] Mao X, Chen Q and Granick S 2013 Nat. Mater. 12 217 [9] Jiang S, Yan J, Whitmer J K, Anthony S M, Luijten E and Granick S 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 218301 [10] Rezvantalab H, Beltran-Villegas D J and Larson R G 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 128001 [11] Huang Z, Zhu G, Chen P, Hou C and Yan L T 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 198002 [12] Huang T, Han Y L and Chen Y 2020 Soft Matter 6 3015 [13] Liang Y H, Ma B and Olvera de la Cruz M 2021 Phys. Rev. E 103 062607 [14] Mitsumoto K and Yoshino H 2018 Soft Matter 14 3919 [15] Shin H and Schweizer K S 2014 Soft Matter 10 262 [16] Iwashita Y and Kimura Y 2014 Soft Matter 10 7170 [17] Patrykiejew A and Rmżysko W 2020 Physica A 548 123883 [18] Patrykiejew A and Rmżysko W 2021 Physica A 570 125819, containing corrections to Ref. [17] [19] Huang T, Zeng C H, Wang H, Chen Y and Han Y L 2022 Phys. Rev. E 106 014612 [20] Hu H, Ziff R M and Deng Y J 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 278002 [21] Wang Q C, He Z F, Wang J F and Hu H 2022 Phys. Rev. E 105 034118 [22] Kern N and Frenkel D 2003 J. Chem. Phys. 118 9882 [23] Jiang S and Granick S 2008 Langmuir 24 2438 [24] Manousiouthakis V I and Deem M W 1999 J. Chem. Phys. 110 2753 [25] Scullard C R and Ziff R M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 185701 [26] Scullard C R and Ziff R M 2010 J. Stat. Mech. P03021 [27] Scullard C R 2011 J. Stat. Mech. P09022 [28] Scullard C R and Jacobsen J L 2012 J. Phys. A: Math Theor. 45 494004 [29] Mertens S and Ziff R M 2016 Phys. Rev. E 94 062152 [30] Scullard C R and Jacobsen J L 2020 Phys. Rev. Res. 2 012050 [31] Machta J, Choi Y S, Lucke A, Schweizer T and Chayes L M 1996 Phys. Rev. E 54 1332 [32] Newman M E J and Ziff R M 2001 Phys. Rev. E 64 016706 [33] Xu W H, Wang J F, Hu H and Deng Y J 2021 Phys. Rev. E 103 022127 [34] Fisher M E and Stephenson J 1963 Phys. Rev. 132 1411 [35] Fendley P, Moessner R and Sondhi S L 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 214513 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|