| CONDENSED MATTER: STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND THERMAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Influence of particle size on the breaking of aluminum particle shells |
| Tian-Yi Wang(王天一)1, Zheng-Qing Zhou(周正青)1,†, Jian-Ping Peng(彭剑平)2, Yu-Kun Gao(高玉坤)1, and Ying-Hua Zhang(张英华)1 |
1 School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
2 Zhaojin Mining Industry Co., Ltd, Zhaoyuan 265400, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Rupturing the alumina shell (shell-breaking) is a prerequisite for releasing energy from aluminum powder. Thermal stress overload in a high-temperature environment is an important factor in the rupture of the alumina shell. COMSOL Multiphysics was used to simulate and analyze the shell-breaking response of micron-scale aluminum particles with different particle sizes at 650 ℃ in vacuum. The simulation results show that the thermal stability time and shell-breaking response time of 10 μm-100 μm aluminum particles are 0.15 μs-11.44 μs and 0.08 μs-3.94 μs, respectively. They also reveal the direct causes of shell breaking for aluminum particles with different particle sizes. When the particle size is less than 80 μm, the shell-breaking response is a direct result of compressive stress overload. When the particle size is between 80 μm and 100 μm, the shell-breaking response is a direct result of tensile stress overload. This article provides useful guidance for research into the energy release of aluminum powder.
|
Received: 24 October 2021
Revised: 30 December 2021
Accepted manuscript online: 17 February 2022
|
|
PACS:
|
61.66.Dk
|
(Alloys )
|
| |
62.20.mq
|
(Buckling)
|
| |
68.35.Rh
|
(Phase transitions and critical phenomena)
|
| |
61.43.Gt
|
(Powders, porous materials)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11802160). |
Corresponding Authors:
Zheng-Qing Zhou
E-mail: zhouzhengqing@ustb.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Tian-Yi Wang(王天一), Zheng-Qing Zhou(周正青), Jian-Ping Peng(彭剑平),Yu-Kun Gao(高玉坤), and Ying-Hua Zhang(张英华) Influence of particle size on the breaking of aluminum particle shells 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 076107
|
[1] Richard A Y, Grant A R and Steven F S 2009 P. Combust. inst. 32 1819
[2] Sikder A K and Sikder N 2004 J. Hazard. Mater. 112 1
[3] Wang J, Zhang L, Mao Y F and Gong F Y 2020 Combust. Flame 214 419
[4] Badgujara D M, Talawarb M B, Asthanab S N and Mahulikar P P 2008 J. Hazard. Mater. 151 289
[5] Zhu B Z, Li F, Sun Y L, Wu Y X, Wang Q C, Wang Q and Han W K 2017 Energ. Fuel 31 8674
[6] Mandilas C, Karagiannakis G, Konstandopoulos A G, Beatrice C, Lazzro M, Blasio G D, Molina S, Pastor J V and Gil A 2014 Energ. Fuel 28 3430
[7] Firmansyah D A, Sullivan K, Lee K S, Kim Y H, Zahaf R, Zachariah M R and Lee D 2011 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 404
[8] Jeurgens L P H, Sloof W G, Tichelaar F D and Mittemeijer E J 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 4707
[9] Jeurgens L P H, Sloof W G, Tichelaar F D and Mittemeijer E J 2002 Thin. Solid. Films 418 89
[10] Song L, Xu S Y, Zhao F Q and Ju X H 2020 J. Mater. Sci. 55 14858
[11] Jiao Q J, Wang Q S, Nie J X and Pei H B 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 088201
[12] Zhu B Z, Li F, Sun Y L, Wu Y X, Shi W, Han W K, Wang Q C and Wang Q 2019 Combust. Flame 205 68
[13] Bazyn T, Glumac N, Krier H, Ward T S, Schoenitz M and Dreizin E L 2007 Combust. Sci. Technol. 179 457
[14] Eisenreich N, Fietzek H, Juez-Lorenzo M, Kolarik V, Koleczko A and Weiser V 2004 Propell. Explos. Pyrot. 29 137
[15] Eisenreich N, Fietzek H, Juez-Lorenzo M, Kolarik, V, Weiser V and Koleczko A 2005 Mater. High. Temp. 22 329
[16] Trunov M A, Schoenitz M, Zhu X Y and Dreizin E L 2005 Combust. Flame 140 310
[17] Trunov M A, Umbrajkar S M, Schoenitz M, Mang J T and Dreizin E L 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B 110 13094
[18] Trunov M A, Schoenitz M and Dreizin E L 2006 Combust. Theor. Model. 10 603
[19] Lipkin D M, Clarke D R, Hollatz M, Bobeth M and Pompe W 1997 Corros. Sci. 39 231
[20] Zhao W, Li Z Q and Gleeson B 2013 Oxid. Met. 79 361
[21] Guo L G, Song W L, Xie C S, Zhang X T and Hu M L 2007 Mater. Lett. 61 3211
[22] Guo L G, Song W L, Hu M L, Xie C S and Chen X 2008 Appl. Surf. Sci. 254 2413
[23] Khan A, Huang Y, Dong Z and Peng X 2019 Corros. Sci. 150 91
[24] Levitas V I, Pantoya M L and Dean S 2014 Combust. Flame 161 1668
[25] Levitas V I, Pantoya M L and Dikici B 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 011921
[26] Levitas V I, Asay B W, Son S F and Pantoya M L 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 101 083524
[27] GB3169.1-8. Determination of activated aluminum by gas volumetric method (Beijing:China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association) 1982 (in Chinese)
[28] Zeng L, Jiao Q J, Ren H and Zhou Q 2012 Trans. Beijing Inst. Technol. 32 206 (in Chinese)
[29] Miyake K, Hirata Y, Shimonosono T and Sameshima S 2018 Materials 11 1137
[30] Sun Y and Liu L G 2006 Energy. Technol. Manage. 03 44 (in Chinese)
[31] Zhang Q Y, Zheng Y X, Zhou F H and Yu T X 2020 Int. J. Mech. Sci. 167 105119 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
