Variable optical chirality in atomic assisted microcavity
Hao Zhang(张浩)2, Wen-Xiu Li (李文秀)1, Peng Han(韩鹏)1, Xiao-Yang Chang(常晓阳)1, Shuo Jiang(蒋硕)1, An-Ping Huang(黄安平)1, and Zhi-Song Xiao(肖志松)1,3, †
1 Key Laboratory of Micro-nano Measurement, Manipulation and Physics (Ministry of Education), School of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China 2 Research Institute of Frontier Science, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China 3 Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
The manipulating of optical waves in a microcavity is essential to developing the integrated optical devices. Generally, the two eigenmodes in a whispering-gallery-mode (WGM) microcavity possess chiral symmetry. Here we show the chiral symmetry breaking is induced by the asymmetric backscattering of counter-propagating optical waves in a whispering-gallery-mode (WGM) microcavity with a cavity-made slot filled with atomic vapor. Through tuning the dispersion relation of the atomic vapor in the cavity-made slot, the chiral modes are continuously steered. The mode frequency splitting in the transmission and reflection spectra stem from the chiral symmetry breaking of the two eigenmodes. The displacement sensitivity of the proposed system in response to the length variation of cavity-made slot exhibits a high sensitivity value of 15.22 THz/nm.
Received: 17 May 2020
Revised: 31 August 2020
Accepted manuscript online: 09 September 2020
Fund: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11574021, 61975005, and 11804017) and the Fund from Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences, China (Grant No. Y18G28).
Hao Zhang(张浩), Wen-Xiu Li (李文秀), Peng Han(韩鹏), Xiao-Yang Chang(常晓阳), Shuo Jiang(蒋硕), An-Ping Huang(黄安平), and Zhi-Song Xiao(肖志松) Variable optical chirality in atomic assisted microcavity 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 114207
Fig. 1.
(a) Schematic diagram of WGM microcavity coupled with (b) cavity-made slot and (c) filled with three-level atomic vapor.
Symbols
Meaning
κex
external coupling between microresonator and waveguide
κ0
intrinsic loss in the microresonator
γc1,2
cross-coupling rate between CW and CCW waves
r
pump rate acting on energy levels |1〉 → |2〉
Ωμ
driving field Rabi frequency acting on |1〉 → |3〉
γ
decay rate from state |1〉 → |2〉
effective reflectivity of cavity-made slot
reflectivity of slot surface
R0
radius of microresonator
αslot
field propagation loss into atomic vapor
aslot
propagation amplitude attenuation when light travels through slot
n0
refractive index of microresonator
χ
susceptibility of atomic vapor
ω12
transition frequency from |2〉 → |1〉
ωp
frequency of probe field
γtotal
total loss rate for microresonator
Γslot
absorption loss rate of atomic vapor
τ0
optical round-trip time in microresonator
Table 1.
Simulation parameters.
Fig. 2.
The slot reflection to the CCW and CW waves varying with the slot surface reflection at panel (a) r = 2γ and Ωμ = γ, panel (b) r = 2γ and Ωμ = 2γ, panel (c) r = 0.1 γ and Ωμ = 1γ, and panel (d) r = 0.1γ and Ωμ = 2γ. The length of the cavity-made slot is set to be Lslot = 6cπ / ω12 which is 3 wavelengths at ω12.
Fig. 3.
The slot reflection to the CCW and CW waves varying with the pump rate r at panel (a) Ωμ = γ and , panel (b) Ωμ = 2γ ad , panel (c) Ωμ = 1γ and , and panel (d) Ωμ = 2γ and .
Fig. 4.
The IR values adjusted by controlling pump rate r at four optimum values of obtained in Fig. 2 when the driving field Rabi frequency is Ωμ = γ.
Fig. 5.
(a) Transmission and reflection spectra versusΔ ω for four values of pump rate r (0.1γ, 0.2γ, 0.3γ, and 0.4γ) and driving field frequency Ωμ = 7γ. (b) Transmission and reflection spectra versus Δ ω for four values of driving field frequency Ωμ (7γ, 8γ, 9γ, and 10γ) and r = 0.1γ. [(a) and (b)] Insets show magnified details of no shifted peaks of transmission and reflection spectra.
Fig. 6.
(a) Slot IR representing asymmetric backscattering of cavity-made slot, (b) chirality continuously tuned via steering pump rate r, (c) frequency splitting quality Qspversus pump rate, with shaded regions representing normal dispersion, and blank regions referring to anomalous dispersion. Some parameters used here are as follows: κ0 = κex = 1 × 1011 Hz, , , radius of WGM microcavity R0 = 30λ/(2πn0), and refractive index n0 = 1.5.
Fig. 7.
Curves of frequency split versusLslotωp in transmission with (a) driving field frequency Ωμ = 7γ for r = 0.1γ, 0.2γ, 0.3γ, and 0.4γ, and (b) pump rate r = 0.4γ for Ωμ = 7γ, 8γ, 9γ, and 10γ.
Hill M T Dorren H J S de Vries T Leijtens X J M den Besten J H Smalbrugge B Oei Y S Binsma H Khoe G D Smit M K 2004 Nature432 206 DOI: 10.1038/nature03045
[8]
Liu L Kumar R Huybrechts K Spuesens T Roelkens G Geluk E J de Vries T Regreny P Van Thourhout D Baets R Morthier G 2010 Nat. Photon.4 182 DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.268
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.