1State Key Laboratory of Magnetism, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 2School of Science, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, China 3University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Double main phase process is applied to fabricate [(Pr, Nd)1 – xMMx]13.8FebalM1.5B5.9 (x = 0.5 and 0.7; M = Cu, Al, Co, and Nb) sintered magnets with high misch metal (MM) content. In comparison to the magnets by single main phase process, the enhanced magnetic properties have been achieved. For magnets of x = 0.7, Hcj increases to 371.9 kA/m by 60.5%, and (BH)max is significantly enhanced to 253.3 kJ/m3 by 56.9%, compared with those of the single main phase magnets of the same nominal composition. In combination with minor loops and magnetic recoil curves, the property improvement of magnets with double main phase method is well explained. As a result, it is demonstrated that double main phase technology is an effective approach to improve the permanent magnetic properties of MM based sintered magnets.
* Project supported by the National Natural Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51590880, 11564030, and 51571126), the National Key Research Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFB0700903), Fujian Institute of Innovation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. FJCXY18040302), the Key Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. KJZD-EW-M05-1), the Inner Mongolia Science and Technology Major Project of 2016, China, and the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia, China (Grant Nos. 2018LH05006 and 2018LH05011).
Cite this article:
Yan-Li Liu(刘艳丽), Qiang Ma(马强), Xin Wang(王鑫), Jian-Jun Zhou(周建军), Tong-Yun Zhao(赵同云), Feng-Xia Hu(胡凤霞), Ji-Rong Sun(孙继荣), and Bao-Gen Shen(沈保根)† High performance RE–Fe–B sintered magnets with high-content misch metal by double main phase process 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 107504
Fig. 1.
(a) The room-temperature demagnetization curves of the [(Pr, Nd)1 – xMMx]13.8 FebalM1.5B5.9 (x = 0.0, 0.5, 0.7, and 1.0) magnets. (b) XRD patterns of the sintered magnet prepared by SMP or DMP process.
Fig. 2.
The comparison of (BH)max for MM based RE–Fe–B sintered magnets. The solid and hollow symbols are corresponding to SMP and DMP processes, respectively.
Fig. 3.
Temperature dependence of σm and d σm / d T in the range of 300–700 K for [(Pr, Nd)1 – xMMx]13.8FebalM1.5B5.9 (x = 0.5 and 0.7) magnets prepared by DMP process.
Fig. 4.
The back-scattered images of [(Pr, Nd)1 – xMMx]13.8FebalM1.5B5.9 magnets: (a) x = 0.5 with SMP, (b) x = 0.5 with DMP, (c) x = 0.7 with SMP, and (d) x = 0.7 with DMP process.
Fig. 5.
(a) Back-scattered electron image and (b)–(f) the corresponding EDX mappings of La, Ce, Fe, Pr, and Nd for [(Pr, Nd)0.3MM0.7]13.8FebalM1.5B5.9 magnets with SMP process.
Fig. 6.
(a) Back-scattered electron image and (b)–(f) the corresponding EPMA mappings of La, Ce, Fe, Pr, and Nd for [(Pr, Nd)0.3MM0.7]13.8FebalM1.5B5.9 DMP magnets.
Fig. 7.
The dependence of M, Mr, and Hcj of minor loops of [(Pr, Nd)1 – xMMx]13.8FebalM1.5B5.9 magnets on H/Hcj for (a) x = 0.5 and (b) x = 0.7, the insets show the minor loops.
Fig. 8.
The recoil loops for [(Pr, Nd)1 – xMMx]13.8FebalM1.5B5.9 (x = 0.5 and 0.7) magnets with SMP and DMP processes, respectively.
Fig. 9.
(a) The recoil loops for [(Pr, Nd)0.5MM0.5]13.8FebalM1.5B5.9 DMP magnets, (b) the dependence of χrev/σs on the applied magnetic field H deduced from the recoil loops for [(Pr, Nd)1 – xMMx]13.8FebalM1.5B5.9 (x = 0.5 and 0.7) magnets with SMP and DMP processes, respectively.
[1]
Sagawa M, Fujimura S, Togawa N, Yamamoto H, Matsuura Y 1984 J. Appl. Phys. 55 2083 DOI: 10.1063/1.333572
[2]
Hu B P, Niu E, Zhao Y G, Chen G A, Chen Z A, Jin G S, Zhang J, Rao X L, Wang Z X 2013 AIP Adv. 3 042136 DOI: 10.1063/1.4803657
[3]
Zhu M G, Han R, Li W, Huang S L, Zheng D W, Song L W, Shi X N 2015 IEEE Trans. Magn. 51 2104604 DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2015.2451696
Hirosawa S, Matsuura Y, Yamamoto H, Fujimura S, Sagawa M, Yamauchi H 1986 J. Appl. Phys. 59 873 DOI: 10.1063/1.336611
[17]
Liao X F, Zhao L Z, Zhang J S, Zhong X C, Jiao D L, Liu Z W 2018 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 464 31 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.05.041
[18]
Zhang X F, Shi Y, Ma Q, Liu Y L, Shi M F, Li Y F, Wang G F, Zhao Z R 2015 Rare Metal Mat. Eng. 44 748 DOI: 1002-185X(2015)03-0748-05
[19]
Zhu M G, Li W, Wang J D, Zheng L Y, Li Y F, Zhang K, Feng H B, Liu T 2014 IEEE Trans. Magn. 50 1000104 DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2013.2278018
[20]
Niu E, Chen Z A, Chen G A, Zhao Y G, Zhang J, Rao X L, Hu B P, Wang Z X 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 113912 DOI: 10.1063/1.4869202
[21]
Jin J Y, Ma T Y, Zhang Y J, Bai G H, Yan M 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 32200 DOI: 10.1038/srep32200
[22]
Shang R X, Xiong J F, Liu D, Zuo S L, Zhao X, Li R, Zuo W L, Zhao T Y, Chen R J, Sun J R, Shen B G 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 057502 DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/26/5/057502
[23]
Lai R S, Chen R J, Yin W Z, Tang X, Wang Z X, Jin C X, Lee D, Yan A R 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 724 275 DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.290
[24]
Zhang Y J, Ma T Y, Jin J Y, Li J T, Wu C, Shen B G, Yan M 2017 Acta Mater. 128 22 DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.02.002
[25]
Yu X Q 2018 Study on structure, magntic properties and magnetic hardening mechanism of sintered permanent magnets based on misch metal Ph. D. dissertation Beijing Beijing University of Technology in Chinese Chapter 5 76 80
[26]
Liu W Q, Zhang Z P, Yue M, Li Z, Wu D, Zhou Z, Chen H, Li Y Q, Pang Z S, Yu X 2019 Intermetallics 115 106626 DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2019.106626
[27]
Shang R X, Xiong J F, Li R, Zuo W L, Zhang J, Zhao T Y, Chen R J, Sun J R, Shen B G 2017 AIP Adv. 7 056215 DOI: 10.1063/1.4973603
[28]
Chen H, Liu W Q, Yin Y T, Li Z, Wang Z J, Li Y Q, Yue M, Pang Z S, Yu X, Yu C H 2020 Intermetallics 124 106870 DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2020.106870
[29]
Ma Q, Zhu J T, Zhang X F, Zhao Z R, Liu Y L, Wang G F, Li Y F, Li Z B 2018 Rare Metals 37 237 DOI: 10.1007/s12598-017-0887-8
[30]
Liu Y L, Zhou J J, Wang X, Ma Q, Liu F, Liu J, Zhao T Y, Hu F X, Sun J R, Shen B G 2020 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 513 167162 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167162
[31]
Sepehri-Amin H, Liu L H, Ohkubo T, Yano M, Shoji T, Kato A, Schrefl T, Hono K 2015 Acta Mater. 99 297
[32]
Li Z B, Shen B G, Sun J R 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 013902 DOI: 10.1063/1.4772606
[33]
Fan X D, Guo S, Chen K, Chen R J, Lee D, You C Y, Yan A R 2016 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 419 394 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.06.048
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
