INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Research on SEE mitigation techniques using back junction and p+ buffer layer in domestic non-DTI SiGe HBTs by TCAD |
Jia-Nan Wei(魏佳男), Chao-Hui He(贺朝会), Pei Li(李培), Yong-Hong Li(李永宏) |
School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China |
|
|
Abstract In this paper we investigate two techniques for single event effect (SEE) mitigation by using back junction and p+ buffer layer in non-deep trench isolation (DTI) domestic silicon-germanium heterojunction bipolar transistors (SiGe HBTs) based on technology computer aided design (TCAD) simulation. The effectiveness of the two mitigation techniques and the influence of various structure parameters are investigated. Simulation results indicate that the two techniques are more effective in reducing collector charge collection induced by heavy ions striking at positions outside the collector-substrate (C-S) junction where charge collection is dominated by diffusion. By properly adjusting the parameters, charge collection of events outside the C-S junction can be reduced by more than an order of magnitude, while charge collection of events in the device center is halved without affecting the direct current (DC) and alternating current (AC) characteristics of the SiGe HBTs.
|
Received: 06 March 2019
Revised: 01 April 2019
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
85.30.Pq
|
(Bipolar transistors)
|
|
61.80.Jh
|
(Ion radiation effects)
|
|
61.80.Az
|
(Theory and models of radiation effects)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11775167, 11575138, and 11835006). |
Corresponding Authors:
Chao-Hui He
E-mail: hechaohui@mail.xjtu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Jia-Nan Wei(魏佳男), Chao-Hui He(贺朝会), Pei Li(李培), Yong-Hong Li(李永宏) Research on SEE mitigation techniques using back junction and p+ buffer layer in domestic non-DTI SiGe HBTs by TCAD 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 068503
|
[1] |
Sutton A K, Haugerud B M, Lu Y, Kuo W L, Cressler J D, Marshall P W, Reed R A, Rieh J S, Freeman G and Ahlgren D 2004 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 51 3736
|
[2] |
Cressler J D 2013 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 60 1992
|
[3] |
Cressler J D, Hamilton M C, Mullinax G S and Li Y 2000 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 47 2515
|
[4] |
Cressler J D 2005 P. IEEE 93 1559
|
[5] |
Krithivasan R, Lu Y, Cressler J D, Rieh J S, Kater M H, Ahlgren D and Freeman G 2006 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 27 567
|
[6] |
Montes E J, Reed R A, Pellish J A, Alles M L, Schrimpf R D, Weller R A, Varadharajaperumal M, Niu G, Sutton A K and Diestelhorst R 2008 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 55 1581
|
[7] |
Marshall P W, Carts M A, Campbell A, McMorrow D, Buchner S, Stewart R, Randall B, Gilbert B and Reed R A 2000 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 47 2669
|
[8] |
Marshall P W, Carts M A, Campbell A, Ladbury R, Reed R A, Marshall C, Currie S, McMorrow D, Buchner S, Seidleck C, Riggs P, Fritz K, Randall B and Gilbert B 2004 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 51 3457
|
[9] |
Pellish J A, Reed R A, Sutton A K, Weller R A, Carts M A, Marshall P W, Marshall C J, Krithivasan R, Cressler J D, Mendenhall M H, Schrimpf R D, Warren K M, Sierawski B D and Niu G 2007 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 54 2322
|
[10] |
Phillips S D, Moen K A, Lourenco N E and Cressler J D 2012 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 59 2682
|
[11] |
Fleetwood Z E, Ildefonso A, Tzintzarov G N, Wier B, Raghunathan U, Cho M K, Song I, Wachter M T, Nergui D, Khachatrian A, Warner J H, McMarr P, Hughes H, Zhang E, McMorrow D, Paki P, Joseph A, Jain V and Cressler J D 2018 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 65 399
|
[12] |
Sutton A K, Bellini M, Cressler J D, Pellish J A, Reed R A, Marshall P W, Niu G, Vizkelethy G, Turowski M and Raman A 2007 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 54 2044
|
[13] |
Varadharajaperumal M, Niu G, Wei X, Zhang T, Cressler J D, Reed R A and Marshal P W 2007 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 54 2330
|
[14] |
Vizkelethy G, Phillips S D, Najafizadeh L and Cressler J D 2010 Nucl. Instrum. Method B 268 2092
|
[15] |
Niu G, Yang H, Varadharajaperumal M, Shi Y, Cressler J D, Krithivasan R, Marshall P W and Reed R A 2006 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 52 2153
|
[16] |
Li P, Guo H X, Guo Q, Zhang J X and Wei Y 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 088505
|
[17] |
Zhang J X, Guo Q, Guo H X, Lu W, He C H, Wang X, Li P and Liu M H 2016 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 63 1251
|
[18] |
Liu M H, He C F, Lu W, Ma W Y, Jiang K, Wang X, Li X L, Guo Q and Xun M Z 2016 Chin. Phys. C 40 036003
|
[19] |
Zhang J X, He C H, Guo H X, Tang D, Xiong C, Li P and Wang X 2015 Microelectron. Reliab. 55 1180
|
[20] |
Zhang J X, Guo H X, Guo Q, Wen L, Cui J W, Xi S B, Wang X and Deng W 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 048501 (in Chinese)
|
[21] |
Zhang J X, He C H, Guo H X, Li P, Guo B L and Wu X X 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 088502
|
[22] |
Wei J N, He C H, Li P, Li Y H and Guo H X 2019 Microelectron. Reliab. 95 28
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|