|
|
Effect of elliptical polarizations on nonsequential double ionization in two-color elliptically polarized laser fields |
Tong-Tong Xu(徐彤彤), Jia-He Chen(陈佳贺), Xue-Fei Pan(潘雪飞), Hong-Dan Zhang(张宏丹), Shuai Ben(贲帅), Xue-Shen Liu(刘学深) |
Institute of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China |
|
|
Abstract Using the classical ensemble model, we investigate the nonsequential double ionization (NSDI) of Ar and Mg in the two-color elliptically polarized laser pulse for different elliptical polarizations. Numerical results show that for Ar atoms the NSDI yield increases as the ellipticity increases, which is different from the case of Mg atoms. Moreover, the correlated behavior in the correlated electron momentum along the x direction and ion momentum distributions of Ar atoms are influenced by the ellipticity. By statistical analysis of different times, we can conclude that the ellipticity may be responsible for the NSDI processes. The correlated momenta distributions along the x direction at the recollision time are demonstrated and the results show that the travelling time and ellipticity can affect the emitted directions of both electrons.
|
Received: 25 May 2018
Revised: 21 June 2018
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
32.80.Rm
|
(Multiphoton ionization and excitation to highly excited states)
|
|
42.50.Hz
|
(Strong-field excitation of optical transitions in quantum systems; multiphoton processes; dynamic Stark shift)
|
|
42.65.Ky
|
(Frequency conversion; harmonic generation, including higher-order harmonic generation)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61575077) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province, China (Grant No. 20180101225JC). |
Corresponding Authors:
Xue-Shen Liu
E-mail: liuxs@jlu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Tong-Tong Xu(徐彤彤), Jia-He Chen(陈佳贺), Xue-Fei Pan(潘雪飞), Hong-Dan Zhang(张宏丹), Shuai Ben(贲帅), Xue-Shen Liu(刘学深) Effect of elliptical polarizations on nonsequential double ionization in two-color elliptically polarized laser fields 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 093201
|
[1] |
Chen Y J, Yu S G, Sun R P, Gong C, Hua L Q, Lai X Y, Quan W and Liu X J 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 043301
|
[2] |
Sun F, Wei D, Zhang G Z, Ding X and Yao J Q 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 123202
|
[3] |
Agostini P, Fabre F, Mainfray G, Petite G and Rahman N K 1979 Phys. Rev. Lett. 42 1127
|
[4] |
Kruit P, Kimman J, Muller H G and van der Wiel M J 1983 Phys. Rev. A 28 248
|
[5] |
Paulus G G, Nicklich W, Xu H, Lambropoulos P and Walther H 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 2851
|
[6] |
Fittingoff D N, Bolton P R, Chang B and Kulander K C 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 2642
|
[7] |
Walker B, Sheehy B, DiMauro L F, Agostini P, Schafer K J and Kulander K C 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 1227
|
[8] |
Song K L, Yu W W, Ben S, Xu T T, Zhang H D, Guo P Y and Guo J 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 023204
|
[9] |
Krausz F and Ivanov M 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 163
|
[10] |
Huang C, Zhou Y, Zhang Q and Lu P 2013 Opt. Express 21 11382
|
[11] |
Bergues B, Kübel M, Johnson N G, Fischer B, Camus N, Betsch K J, Herrwerth O, Senftleben A, Sayler A M, Rathje T, Pfeifer T, Ben-Itzhak I, Jones R R, Paulus G G, Krausz F, Moshammer R, Ullrich J and Kling M F 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 813
|
[12] |
Ye D F and Liu J 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 043402
|
[13] |
Ben S, Wang T, Xu T, Guo J and Liu X 2016 Opt. Express 24 7525
|
[14] |
Ye D, Li M, Fu L, Liu J, Gong Q, Liu Y and Ullrich J 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 123001
|
[15] |
Li Y B, Wang X, Yu B H, Tang Q B, Wang G H and Wan J G 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 37413
|
[16] |
Huang C, Zhong M and Wu Z 2016 Opt. Express 24 28361
|
[17] |
Xu T T, Zhu Q Y, Chen J H, Ben S, Zhang J and Liu X S 2018 Opt. Express 26 1645
|
[18] |
Zuo T and Bandrauk A D 1995 J. Nonlinear Opt. Phys. Mater. 04 533
|
[19] |
Hao X L, Wang G Q, Jia X Y, Li W D, Liu J and Chen J 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 023408
|
[20] |
Gillen G D, Walker M A and Van Woerkom L D 2001 Phys. Rev. A 64 043413
|
[21] |
Dietrich P, Burnett N H, Ivanov M and Corkum P B 1994 Phys. Rev. A 50 R3585
|
[22] |
Shvetov-Shilovski N I, Goreslavski S P, Popruzhenko S V and Becker W 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 063405
|
[23] |
Wang X and Eberly J H 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 083001
|
[24] |
Xu T T, Ben S, Wang T, Zhang J, Guo J and Liu X S 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 033405
|
[25] |
Li Y, Yu B, Tang Q, Wang X, Hua D, Tong A, Jiang C, Ge G, Li Y and Wan J 2016 Opt. Express 24 6469
|
[26] |
Fu L B, Xin G G, Ye D F and Liu J 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 103601
|
[27] |
Kamor A, Mauger F, Chandre C and Uzer T 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 253002
|
[28] |
Hao J X, Hao X L, Li W D, Hu S L and Chen J 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 043201
|
[29] |
Long S, Becker W and McIver J K 1995 Phys. Rev. A 52 2262
|
[30] |
Eichmann H, Egbert A, Nolte S, Momma C and Wellegehausen B 1995 Phys. Rev. A 51 R3414
|
[31] |
Hasović E, Becker W and Milošević D B 2016 Opt. Express 24 6413
|
[32] |
Milošević D B and Becker W 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 063418
|
[33] |
Yuan K J, Chelkowski S and Bandrauk A D 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 053425
|
[34] |
Chaloupka J L and Hickstein D D 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 143005
|
[35] |
Mancuso C A, Hickstein D D, Dorney K M, Ellis J L, Hasović E, Knut R, Grychtol P, Gentry C, Gopalakrishnan M, Zusin D, Dollar F J, Tong X M, Milošević D B, Becker W, Kapteyn H C and Murnane M M 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 053406
|
[36] |
Mancuso C A, Dorney K M, Hickstein D D, Chaloupka J L, Ellis J L, Dollar F J, Knut R, Grychtol P, Zusin D, Gentry C, Gopalakrishnan M, Kapteyn H C and Murnane M M 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 133201
|
[37] |
Eckart S, Richter M, Kunitski M, Hartung A, Rist J, Henrichs K, Schlott N, Kang H, Bauer T, Sann H, Schmidt L Ph H, Schöffler M, Jahnke T and Dörner R 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 133202
|
[38] |
Ben S, Guo P Y, Pan X F, Xu T T, Song K L and Liu X S 2017 Chem. Phys. Lett. 679 38
|
[39] |
Fleischer A, Kfir O, Diskin T, Sidorenko P and Cohen O 2014 Nat. Photonics 8 543
|
[40] |
Milošević D B 2015 J. Phys. B-At. Mol. Opt. 48 171001
|
[41] |
Panfili R, Eberly J H and Haan S L 2001 Opt. Express 8 431
|
[42] |
Haan S L, Breen L, Karim A and Eberly J H 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 103008
|
[43] |
Wang X, Tian J and Eberly J H 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 073001
|
[44] |
Haan S L, Smith Z S, Shomsky K N and Plantinga P W 2008 J. Phys. B-At. Mol. Opt. 41 211002
|
[45] |
Mauger F, Chandre C and Uzer T 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 083002
|
[46] |
Li N, Zhou Y, Ma X, Li M, Huang C and Lu P 2017 J. Chem. Phys. 147 174302
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|