INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Enhanced ionic conductivity in LAGP/LATP composite electrolyte |
Shi-Gang Ling(凌仕刚)1,2, Jia-Yue Peng(彭佳悦)1,2, Qi Yang(杨琪)1,2, Ji-Liang Qiu(邱纪亮)1,2, Jia-Ze Lu(卢嘉泽)1,2, Hong Li(李泓)1,2 |
1 Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
|
|
Abstract Nasicon materials (sodium superionic conductors) such as Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5(PO4)3 (LAGP) and Li1.4Al0.4Ti1.6(PO4)3 (LATP) have been considered as important solid electrolytes due to their high ionic conductivity and chemical stability. Compared to LAGP, LATP has higher bulk conductivity around 10-3 S/cm at room temperature; however, the apparent grain boundary conductivity is almost two orders of magnitude lower than the bulk, while LAGP has similar bulk and grain boundary conductivity around the order of 10-4 S/cm. To make full use of the advantages of the two electrolytes, pure phase Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5(PO4)3 and Li1.4Al0.4Ti1.6(PO4)3 were synthesized through solid state reaction, a series of composite electrolytes consisting of LAGP and LATP with different weight ratios were designed. XRD and variable temperature AC impedance spectra were carried out to clarify the crystal structure and the ion transport properties of the composite electrolytes. The results indicate that the composite electrolyte with the LATP/LAGP weight ratio of 80:20 achieved the highest bulk conductivity which shall be due to the formation of solid solution phase Li1.42Al0.42Ge0.3Ti1.28(PO4)3, while the highest grain boundary conductivity appeared at the LATP/LAGP weight ratio of 20:80 which may be due to the excellent interfacial phase between Li1+xAlxGeyTi2-x-y(PO4)3/LATP. All the composite electrolytes demonstrated higher total conductivity than the pure LAGP and LATP, which highlights the importance of heterogeneous interface on regulating the ion transport properties.
|
Received: 10 October 2017
Revised: 29 December 2017
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
82.47.Aa
|
(Lithium-ion batteries)
|
|
66.30.-h
|
(Diffusion in solids)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFB0100100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52315206 and 51502334), Fund from Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission, China (Grant No. D171100005517001). |
Corresponding Authors:
Hong Li
E-mail: hli@iphy.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Shi-Gang Ling(凌仕刚), Jia-Yue Peng(彭佳悦), Qi Yang(杨琪), Ji-Liang Qiu(邱纪亮), Jia-Ze Lu(卢嘉泽), Hong Li(李泓) Enhanced ionic conductivity in LAGP/LATP composite electrolyte 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 038201
|
[1] |
Marcinek M, Syzdek J, Marczewski M, Piszcz M, Niedzicki L, Kalita M, Plewa-Marczewska A, Bitner A, Wieczorek P, Trzeciak T, Kasprzyk M, Łȩżak P, Żukowska Z, Zalewska A and Wieczorek W 2015 Solid State Ionics 276 107
|
[2] |
Yao X, Huang B, Yin J, Peng G, Huang Z, Gao C, Liu D and Xu X 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 018802
|
[3] |
Meyer W H 1998 Adv. Mater. 10 439
|
[4] |
Gao J, Zhao Y S, Shi S Q and Li H 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 018211
|
[5] |
Kato Y, Hori S, Saito T, Suzuki K, Hirayama M, Mitsui A, Yonemura M, Iba H and Kanno R 2016 Nature Energy 1 16030
|
[6] |
Murugan R, Thangadurai V and Weppner W 2007 Angewandte Chemie 46 7778
|
[7] |
Yoshiyuki Inaguma, Chen L Q, Itoh M, Nakamura T, Uchida T, Ikuta H and Wakihara M 1993 Solid State Commun. 86 689
|
[8] |
Fujimura K, Seko A, Koyama Y, Kuwabara A, Kishida I, Shitara K, Fisher C A J, Moriwake H and Tanaka I 2013 Advanced Energy Materials 3 980
|
[9] |
Yamamoto H and Nakamura O 1997 Journal of Power Sources 68 397
|
[10] |
Knauth P 2009 Solid State Ionics 180 911
|
[11] |
Aono H, Sugimoto E, Sadaoka Y, Imanaka N and Adachi Gin-ya 1990 J. Electrochem. Soc. 137 1023
|
[12] |
Xu X, Wen Z, Wu X, Yang X and Gu Z 2007 Journal of the American Ceramic Society 90 2802
|
[13] |
Wang S, Ben L, Li H and Chen L 2014 Solid State Ionics 268 110
|
[14] |
Schell K G, Bucharsky E C, Lemke F and Hoffmann M J 2017 Ionics 23 821
|
[15] |
Zhao E, Ma F, Jin Y and Kanamura K 2016 J. Alloy. Compd. 680 646
|
[16] |
Ma F, Zhao E, Zhu S, Yan W, Sun D, Jin Y and Nan C 2016 Solid State Ionics 295 7
|
[17] |
Liu X G, Fu J and Zhang C H 2016 Nanoscale Research Letters 11 551
|
[18] |
Yan B, Zhu Y, Pan F, Liu J and Lu L 2015 Solid State Ionics 278 65
|
[19] |
Kim K M, Shin D O and Lee Y G 2015 Electrochimica Acta 176 1364
|
[20] |
Morimoto H, Hirukawa M, Matsumoto A, Kurahayashi T, Ito N and Tobishima S I 2014 Electrochemistry 82 870
|
[21] |
Kotobuki M, Kobayashi B, Koishi M, Mizushima T and Kakuta N 2014 Materials Technology 29 A93
|
[22] |
Kothari D H and Kanchan D K 2016 Physica B 494 20
|
[23] |
Kothari D H and Kanchan D K 2016 Physica B 501 90
|
[24] |
Arbi K, Bucheli W, Jimenez R and Sanz J 2015 Journal of the European Ceramic Society 35 1477
|
[25] |
Jadhav H S, Kalubarme R S, Jang S Y, Jung K N, Shin K H and Park C J 2014 Dalton Transactions 43 11723
|
[26] |
Chung H and Kang B 2014 Solid State Ionics 263 125
|
[27] |
Jadhav H S, Cho M S, Kalubarme R S, Lee J S, Jung K N, Shin K H and Park C J 2013 Journal of Power Sources 241 502
|
[28] |
Thokchom J S and Kumar B 2008 Journal of Power Sources 185 480
|
[29] |
Leo C J, Rao G V S and Chowdari B V R 2003 Solid State Ionics 159 357
|
[30] |
Yu S C, Mertens A, Gao X, Gunduz D C, Schierholz R, Benning S, Hausen F, Mertens J, Kungl H, Tempel H and Eichel R A 2016 Functional Materials Letters 9 1650066
|
[31] |
Zhao E, Ma F, Guo Y and Jin Y 2016 Rsc Advances 6 92579
|
[32] |
Onishi H, Takai S, Yabutsuka T and Yao T 2016 Electrochemistry 84 967
|
[33] |
Irvine J T S, Sinclair D C and West A R 1990 Advanced Materials 2 132
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|