|
|
Arbitrated quantum signature scheme with continuous-variable squeezed vacuum states |
Yan-Yan Feng(冯艳艳), Rong-Hua Shi(施荣华), Ying Guo(郭迎) |
School of Information Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China |
|
|
Abstract We propose an arbitrated quantum signature (AQS) scheme with continuous variable (CV) squeezed vacuum states, which requires three parties, i.e., the signer Alice, the verifier Bob and the arbitrator Charlie trusted by Alice and Bob, and three phases consisting of the initial phase, the signature phase and the verification phase. We evaluate and compare the original state and the teleported state by using the fidelity and the beam splitter (BS) strategy. The security is ensured by the CV-based quantum key distribution (CV-QKD) and quantum teleportation of squeezed states. Security analyses show that the generated signature can be neither disavowed by the signer and the receiver nor counterfeited by anyone with the shared keys. Furthermore, the scheme can also detect other manners of potential attack although they may be successful. Also, the integrality and authenticity of the transmitted messages can be guaranteed. Compared to the signature scheme of CV-based coherent states, our scheme has better encoding efficiency and performance. It is a potential high-speed quantum signature scheme with high repetition rate and detection efficiency which can be achieved by using the standard off-the-shelf components when compared to the discrete-variable (DV) quantum signature scheme.
|
Received: 19 October 2017
Revised: 17 November 2017
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
|
03.67.Ac
|
(Quantum algorithms, protocols, and simulations)
|
|
03.67.Dd
|
(Quantum cryptography and communication security)
|
|
03.67.Hk
|
(Quantum communication)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61379153 and 61572529). |
Corresponding Authors:
Ying Guo
E-mail: guoyingcsu@sina.com
|
About author: 03.67.-a; 03.67.Ac; 03.67.Dd; 03.67.Hk |
Cite this article:
Yan-Yan Feng(冯艳艳), Rong-Hua Shi(施荣华), Ying Guo(郭迎) Arbitrated quantum signature scheme with continuous-variable squeezed vacuum states 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 020302
|
[1] |
Nielsen M A and Chuang I L 2000 Quantum information (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press)
|
[2] |
Wang B, Wu X and Meng F 2017 J. Comput. Appl. Math. 313 185
|
[3] |
Amiri R and Arrazola J M 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 062334
|
[4] |
Gao F, Liu B, Huang W and Wen Q Y 2015 IEEE. J. Sel. Top. Quant. 21 98
|
[5] |
Wei C Y, Wang T Y and Gao F 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 042318
|
[6] |
Wei C Y, Cai X Q, Liu B, Wang T and Gao F 2017 IEEE T. Comput. DOI:10.1109/TC.2017.2721404
|
[7] |
Shi R H, Mu Y, Zhong H and Zhang S 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 022309
|
[8] |
Shi R H, Mu Y, Zhong H, Zhang S and Cui J 2016 Inform. Sci. 370-371 147
|
[9] |
Zeng G and Keitel C H 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 042312
|
[10] |
Lee H, Hong C, Kim H, Lim J and Yang H J 2004 Phys. Lett. A 321 295
|
[11] |
Curty M and Lütkenhaus N 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 046301
|
[12] |
Zeng G 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 016301
|
[13] |
Li Q, Chan W H and Long D Y 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 054307
|
[14] |
Zou X and Qiu D 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 042325
|
[15] |
Choi J W, Chang K Y and Hong D 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 062330
|
[16] |
Li F G and Shi J H 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 2171
|
[17] |
Yang Y G, Lei H, Liu Z C, Zhou Y H and Shi W M 2016 Quantum Inf. Process. 15 2487
|
[18] |
Guo Y, Feng Y, Huang D and Shi J 2016 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55 2290
|
[19] |
Shang T, Zhao X, Wang C and Liu J 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 393
|
[20] |
Wang B, Yang H and Meng F 2017 Calcolo 54 117
|
[21] |
Su Qi, Huang Z, Wen Q and L W 2010 Opt. Commun. 283 4408
|
[22] |
Wang T Y and Wen Q Y 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 060307
|
[23] |
Shi J J, Shi R H, Guo Y and Peng X Q 2013 Sci. China-Inform. Sci. 56 1
|
[24] |
Fan L, Zhang H J, Qin S L and Guo F Z 2016 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55 1028
|
[25] |
Yang Y G and Wen Q Y 2008 Sci. China Ser. G:Phys., Mech. Astron. 51 1505
|
[26] |
Wen X, Tian Y, Ji L and Niu X 2010 Phys. Scr. 81 055001
|
[27] |
Shi J, Shi R, Tang Y and Lee M H 2011 Quantum Inf. Process. 10 653
|
[28] |
Xu G B and Zhang K J 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 2577
|
[29] |
Wang T Y and Wei Z L 2012 Quantum Inf. Process. 11 455
|
[30] |
Gottesman D and Chuang I 2001 arXiv preprint quant-ph0105032
|
[31] |
Collins R J, Donaldson R J, Dunjko V, Wallden P, Clarke P J, Andersson E, Jeffers J and Buller G S 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 040502
|
[32] |
Yin H L, Fu Y and Chen Z B 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 032316
|
[33] |
Li W, Shi R, Huang D, Shi J and Guo Y 2016 Phys. Scr. 91 035101
|
[34] |
Liu J L, Shi R H, Shi J J, Lv G L and Guo Y 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 080306
|
[35] |
Braunstein S L and Van Loock P 2005 Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 513
|
[36] |
Wang X B 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230503
|
[37] |
Scarani V, Acin A, Ribordy G and Gisin N 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 057901
|
[38] |
Takei N, Aoki T, Koike S, Yoshino K, Wakui K, Yonezawa H, Hiraoka T, Mizuno J, Takeoka M, Ban M and Furusawa A 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 042304
|
[39] |
Zeng G, Lee M, Guo Y and He G 2007 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 5 553
|
[40] |
Ma H, Huang P, Bao W and Zeng G 2016 Quantum Inf. Process. 15 2605
|
[41] |
Jouguet P, Kunz-Jacques S and Leverrier A 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 062317
|
[42] |
Cerf N J, Levy M and Van Assche G 2001 Phys. Rev. A 63 052311
|
[43] |
Guo Y, Liao Q, Wang Y, Huang D, Huang Peng and Zeng G 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 032304
|
[44] |
Guo Y, Xie C, Liao Q, Zhao W, Zeng G and Huang D 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 022320
|
[45] |
Huang D, Huang P, Lin D and Zeng G 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 19201
|
[46] |
Li Y M, Wang X Y, Bai Z L, Liu W Y, Yang S S and Peng K C 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 040303
|
[47] |
Einstein A, Podolsky B and Rosen N 1935 Phys. Rev. 47 777
|
[48] |
Walls D F and Milburn G J 2007 Quantum Optics (Springer Science, Business Media)
|
[49] |
Jeong H, Ralph T C and Bowen W P 2007 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24 355
|
[50] |
Furusawa A, Sfrensen J L, Braunstein S L, Fuchs C A, Kimble H J and Polzik E S 1998 Science 282 706
|
[51] |
Twamley J 1996 J. Phys. A:Math. Gen. 29 3723
|
[52] |
Andersson E, Curty M and Jex I 2006 Phys. Rev. A 74 022304
|
[53] |
Gao F, Qin S J, Guo F Z and Wen Q Y 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 022344
|
[54] |
Kogias I, Ragy S and Adesso G 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 052324
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|