|
|
Quantum coherence and non-Markovianity of an atom in a dissipative cavity under weak measurement |
Yu Liu(刘禹), Hong-Mei Zou(邹红梅), Mao-Fa Fang(方卯发) |
Key Laboratory of Low-dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education, College of Physics and Information Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China |
|
|
Abstract Quantum coherence and non-Markovianity of an atom in a dissipative cavity under weak measurement are investigated in this work. We find that:the quantum coherence obviously depends on the initial atomic state, the strength of the weak measurement and its reversal, the atom-cavity coupling constant and the non-Markovian effect. It is obvious that the weak measurement effect protects the coherence better. The quantum coherence is preserved more efficiently for larger atom-cavity coupling. The stronger the non-Markovian effect is, the more slowly the coherence reduces. The quantum coherence can be effectively protected by means of controlling these physical parameters.
|
Received: 15 August 2017
Revised: 25 September 2017
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.65.Yz
|
(Decoherence; open systems; quantum statistical methods)
|
|
34.80.Qb
|
(Laser-modified scattering)
|
|
42.25.Kb
|
(Coherence)
|
|
03.65.Ta
|
(Foundations of quantum mechanics; measurement theory)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Education Department, China (Grant No. 16C0949), the Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate, China (Grant No. CX2017B177), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11374096), and the Doctoral Science Foundation of Hunan Normal University, China. |
Corresponding Authors:
Hong-Mei Zou
E-mail: zhmzc1997@126.com
|
Cite this article:
Yu Liu(刘禹), Hong-Mei Zou(邹红梅), Mao-Fa Fang(方卯发) Quantum coherence and non-Markovianity of an atom in a dissipative cavity under weak measurement 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 010304
|
[1] |
Baumgratz T, Cramer M and Plenio M B 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 140401
|
[2] |
Bu K, Kumar A and Wu J 2016 arXiv:1603.06322 [quant-ph]
|
[3] |
Mondal D, Pramanik T and Pati A K 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 010301
|
[4] |
Huang Z and Situ H 2017 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56 503
|
[5] |
Mortezapour A, Borji M A and Franco R L 2017 arXiv:1705.00887v1 [quant-ph]
|
[6] |
Chin S 2017 arXiv:1702.03219 [quan-ph]
|
[7] |
Streltsov A, Chitambar E, Rana S, Bera M N, Winter A and Lewenxtein M 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 240405
|
[8] |
Yao Y, Xiao X, Ge L and Sun C P 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 022112
|
[9] |
Guo Y and Goswami S 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 062340
|
[10] |
Mukhopadhyay C, Das S, Bhattacharya S, Sen A and Sen U 2017 arXiv:1705.04343v1 [quan-ph]
|
[11] |
Zhang Y R, Shao L H, Li Y M and Fan H 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 012334
|
[12] |
Peng Y, Jiang Y and Fan H 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 032326
|
[13] |
Aharonov Y, Albert D Z and Vaidman L 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1351
|
[14] |
Koashi M and Ueda M 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 2598
|
[15] |
Situ H Z and Hu X Y 2016 Quantum Inf. Process. 15 4649
|
[16] |
Zou H M and Fang M F 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 2673
|
[17] |
Jaynes E T and Cummings F W 1963 Proc. IEEE 51 89
|
[18] |
Zou H M, Fang M F and Yang B Y 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 120303
|
[19] |
Zou H M and Fang M F 2016 J. Mod. Opt. 63 2279
|
[20] |
Zou H M and Fang M F 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 090302
|
[21] |
Breuer H P and Petruccione F 2002 The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp. 461-479
|
[22] |
Wang M M and Qu Z G 2013 arXiv:1612.06020v1 [quan-ph]
|
[23] |
Scala M, Militello B, Messina A, Maniscalco S, Piilo J and Suominen K A 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 043827
|
[24] |
Breuer H P, Laine E M and Piilo J 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 050403
|
[25] |
Nielsen M A and Chuang I L 2000 Quantum Compution an Quantum Information (England: Cambridge University Press) pp. 399-400
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|