INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Design and optimization of carbon nanotube/polymer actuator by using finite element analysis |
Wei Zhang(张薇)1,2, Luzhuo Chen(陈鲁倬)1,2, Jianmin Zhang(张健敏)1,2, Zhigao Huang(黄志高)1,2 |
1 Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Quantum Manipulation and New Energy Materials, College of Physics and Energy, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China;
2 Fujian Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center for Optoelectronic Semiconductors and Efficient Devices, Xiamen 361005, China |
|
|
Abstract In recent years, actuators based on carbon nanotube (CNT) or graphene demonstrate great potential applications in the fields of artificial muscles, smart switches, robotics, and so on. The electrothermal and photothermal bending actuators based on CNT/graphene and polymer composites show large bending actuations, which are superior to traditional thermal-driven actuators. However, the influence of material parameters (thickness, temperature change, etc.) on the actuation performance needs to be further studied, because it is a critical point to the design and fabrication of high-performance actuators. In this work, finite element analysis (FEA) is employed to simulate the actuation performance of CNT/polymer actuator, which has a bilayer structure. The main focus of this work is to design and to optimize material parameters by using computational method. FEA simulation results show that each layer thickness of actuator has an important influence on the actuation deformation. A maximum curvature of 2.7 cm-1 is obtained by simulation, which is much larger than most of the actuator curvature reported in previous experiments. What is more, larger temperature change and larger difference of coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) between two layers will result in larger bending actuation. This study is expected to provide valuable theoretical reference for the design and realization of CNT-based thermal actuator with ultra-large actuation performance.
|
Received: 21 October 2016
Revised: 17 January 2017
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
88.30.rh
|
(Carbon nanotubes)
|
|
02.70.Dh
|
(Finite-element and Galerkin methods)
|
|
84.60.-h
|
(Direct energy conversion and storage)
|
|
81.05.Qk
|
(Reinforced polymers and polymer-based composites)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11504051, 51202031, 61574037, and 11404058), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (Grant Nos. 2017J06014, 2015J01008, and 2014J01175), Fujian Provincial Program for Distinguished Young Scientists in University (Grant No. J1-1166), and Fujian Provincial Key Project of Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists in University (Grant No. JZ160428). |
Corresponding Authors:
Luzhuo Chen
E-mail: chenluzhuo@163.com
|
Cite this article:
Wei Zhang(张薇), Luzhuo Chen(陈鲁倬), Jianmin Zhang(张健敏), Zhigao Huang(黄志高) Design and optimization of carbon nanotube/polymer actuator by using finite element analysis 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 048801
|
[1] |
Madden J D 2007 Science 318 1094
|
[2] |
Shankar R, Ghosh T K and Spontak R J 2007 Soft Matter 3 1116
|
[3] |
Brochu P and Pei Q 2010 Macromol. Rapid Commun. 31 10
|
[4] |
Lemieux M C, Mcconney M E, Lin Y, Singamaneni S, Jiang H, Bunning T J and Tsukruk V V 2006 Nano Lett. 6 730
|
[5] |
Ikuno T, Honda S, Yasuda T, Oura K, Katayama M, Lee J G and Mori H 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 213104
|
[6] |
Chen L, Liu C, Liu K, Meng C, Hu C, Wang J and Fan S 2011 ACS Nano 5 1588
|
[7] |
Zhu S, Shabani R, Rho J, Kim Y, Hong B H, Ahn J and Cho H J 2011 Nano Lett. 11 977
|
[8] |
Hu Y, Lan T, Wu G, Zhu Z and Chen W 2014 Nanoscale 6 12703
|
[9] |
Li Q, Liu C, Lin Y, Liu L, Jiang K and Fan S 2015 ACS Nano 9 409
|
[10] |
Zeng Z H, Jin H, Zhang L P, Zhang H, Chen Z, Gao F and Zhang Z 2015 Carbon 84 327
|
[11] |
Chen L, Weng M, Zhou Z, Zhou Y, Zhang L, Li J, Huang Z, Zhang W, Liu C and Fan S 2015 ACS Nano 9 12189
|
[12] |
Chen L, Weng M, Zhang W, Zhou Z, Zhou Y, Xia D, Li J, Huang Z, Liu C, Fan S 2016 Nanoscale 8 6877
|
[13] |
Zhang X, Yu Z, Wang C, Zarrouk D, Seo J T, Cheng J C, Buchan A D, Takei K, Zhao Y, Ager J W, Zhang J, Hettick M, Hersam M C, Pisano A P, Fearing R S and Javey A 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 2983
|
[14] |
Hu Y, Wu G, Lan T, Zhao J, Liu Y and Chen W 2015 Adv. Mater. 27 7867
|
[15] |
Wang H, Wang Y, Tee B C K, Kim K, Lopez J, Cai W and Bao Z 2015 Adv. Sci. 1500103
|
[16] |
Pal S, Damle S S, Kumta P N and Maiti S 2013 Comput. Mater. Sci. 79 877
|
[17] |
Citirik E, Demirkan T and Karabacak T 2015 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 33 21503
|
[18] |
Zhang W, Weng M C and Chen L Z 2015 Mater. Sci. Forum 814 107
|
[19] |
Shergold O A, Fleck N A and Radford D 2006 Int. J. Impact Eng. 32 1384
|
[20] |
Liu M, Sun J and Chen Q 2009 Sensor. Actuat. A-Phys. 151 42
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|