|
|
Efficient error estimation in quantum key distribution |
Li Mo (李默)a b, Patcharapong Treeviriyanupabc, Zhang Chun-Mei (张春梅)a b, Yin Zhen-Qiang (银振强)a b, Chen Wei (陈巍)a b, Han Zheng-Fu (韩正甫)a b |
a Key Laboratory of Quantum Information, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China;
b Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information & Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China;
c Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Phranakhon Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand |
|
|
Abstract In a quantum key distribution (QKD) system, the error rate needs to be estimated for determining the joint probability distribution between legitimate parties, and for improving the performance of key reconciliation. We propose an efficient error estimation scheme for QKD, which is called parity comparison method (PCM). In the proposed method, the parity of a group of sifted keys is practically analysed to estimate the quantum bit error rate instead of using the traditional key sampling. From the simulation results, the proposed method evidently improves the accuracy and decreases revealed information in most realistic application situations.
|
Received: 24 February 2014
Revised: 25 July 2014
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.67.Dd
|
(Quantum cryptography and communication security)
|
|
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
|
03.67.Hk
|
(Quantum communication)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant Nos. 2011CBA00200 and 2011CB921200) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61101137, 61201239, and 61205118). |
Corresponding Authors:
Yin Zhen-Qiang, Chen Wei
E-mail: yinzheqi@mail.ustc.edu.cn;kooky@mail.ustc.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Li Mo (李默), Patcharapong Treeviriyanupab, Zhang Chun-Mei (张春梅), Yin Zhen-Qiang (银振强), Chen Wei (陈巍), Han Zheng-Fu (韩正甫) Efficient error estimation in quantum key distribution 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 010302
|
[1] |
Bennet C H and Brassard G 1984 Processings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Singnal Processing, p. 175
|
[2] |
Peev M, Pacher C and Alléaume R 2009 New J. Phys. 11 075001
|
[3] |
Xu F X, Chen W, Wang S, Yin Z Q, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Zhou Z, Zhao Y B, Liu D, Han Z F and Guo G C 2009 Chin. Sci. Bull. 54 2991
|
[4] |
Fröhlich B, Dynes J F, Lucamarini M, Sharpe A W, Yuan Z L and Shields A J 2013 Nature 501 69
|
[5] |
Brassard G and Salvail L 1994 Advances in Cryptology-EUROCRYPT'93 (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag) p. 410
|
[6] |
Pearson D 2004 AIP Conference Proceedings 734 299
|
[7] |
Jesus M M, Elkouss D and Martin V 2013 Sci. Rep. 3 1576
|
[8] |
Cui K, Wang J, Zhang H F, Luo C L, Jin G and Chen T Y 2013 IEEE T. Inf. Foren. Sec. 8 184
|
[9] |
Gisin N, Ribordy G, Tittel W and Zbinden H 2002 Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 145
|
[10] |
Poppe A, Fedrizzi A, Ursin R, Böhm H R, Lorünser T, Maurhardt O, Peev M, Suda M, Kurtsiefer C, Weinfurter H, Jennewein T and Zeilinger A 2004 Opt. Express 12 3865
|
[11] |
Scarani V, Bechmann-Pasquinucc H, Cerf N J, Dušek M, Lütkenhaus N and Peev M 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 1301
|
[12] |
Dixon A R, Yuan Z L, Dynes J F, Sharpe A W and Shields A J 2008 Opt. Express 16 18790
|
[13] |
Gallager R 1963 Low-Density Parity-Check Codes (Ph.D. Thesis) (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
|
[14] |
Wang S, Chen W, Guo J F, Yin Z Q, Li H W, Guo G C and Han Z F 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 1008
|
[15] |
Mo X F, Lucio-Martinez I, Chan P, Healey C, Hosier S and Tittel W 2011 Opt. Express 19 17729
|
[16] |
Tanaka A, Fujiwara M, Yoshino K, Takahashi S, Nambu Y, Tomita A, Miki S, Yamashita T, Wang Z, Sasaki M and Tajima A 2012 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 48 542
|
[17] |
Gottesman D, Lo H K, Lütkenhaus and Preshill J 2004 Quant. Inf. Comput. 5 325
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|