CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Theoretical study of molecular hydrogen and spiltover hydrogen storage on two-dimensional covalent-organic frameworks |
Liu Xiu-Ying (刘秀英)a, He Jie (何杰)a, Yu Jing-Xin (于景新)a, Li Zheng-Xin (栗正新)b, Fan Zhi-Qin (樊志琴)a |
a College of Science, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450000, China; b School of Material Science and Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450000, China |
|
|
Abstract Molecular hydrogen and spiltover hydrogen storages on five two-dimensional (2D) covalent-organic frameworks (COFs) (PPy-COF, TP-COF, BTP-COF, COF-18 Å, and HHTP-DPB COF) are investigated using the grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations and the density functional theory (DFT), respectively. The GCMC simulated results show that HHTP-DPB COF has the best performance for hydrogen storage, followed by BTP-COF, TP-COF, COF-18 Å, and PPy-COF. However, their adsorption amounts at room temperature are all too low to meet the uptake target set by US Department of Energy (US-DOE) and enable practical applications. The effects of pore size, surface area, and isosteric heat of hydrogen on adsorption amount are considered, which indicate that these three factors are all the important factors for determining the H2 adsorption amount. The chemisorptions of spiltover hydrogen atoms on these five COFs represented by the cluster models are investigated using the DFT method. The saturation cluster models are constructed by considering all possible adsorption sites for these cluster models. The average binding energy of a hydrogen atom and the saturation hydrogen storage density are calculated. The large average binding energy indicates that the spillover process may proceed smoothly and reversibly. The saturation hydrogen storage density is much larger than the physisorption uptake of H2 molecules at 298 K and 100 bar (1 bar = 105 Pa), and is close to or exceeds the 2010 US-DOE target of 6 wt% for hydrogen storage. This suggests that the hydrogen storage capacities of these COFs by spillover may be significantly enhanced. Thus 2D COFs studied in this paper are suitable hydrogen storage media by spillover.
|
Received: 22 September 2013
Revised: 18 December 2013
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
73.22.-f
|
(Electronic structure of nanoscale materials and related systems)
|
|
36.40.-c
|
(Atomic and molecular clusters)
|
|
71.15.Mb
|
(Density functional theory, local density approximation, gradient and other corrections)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11247275 and 11304079), the Young Core Instructor of the Higher Education Institutions of Henan Province, the Special Foundation for Fostering Technologic Innovative Talents of Henan University of Technology, China (Grant No. 2012CXRC16), and the Natural Science Foundation of Education Bureau of Henan Province, China (Grant Nos. 2011B140005 and 13A140195). |
Corresponding Authors:
Liu Xiu-Ying
E-mail: liuxiuyingzx@126.com
|
Cite this article:
Liu Xiu-Ying (刘秀英), He Jie (何杰), Yu Jing-Xin (于景新), Li Zheng-Xin (栗正新), Fan Zhi-Qin (樊志琴) Theoretical study of molecular hydrogen and spiltover hydrogen storage on two-dimensional covalent-organic frameworks 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 067303
|
[1] |
Satyapal S, Petrovic J, Read C, Thomas G and Ordaz G 2007 Cat. Today 120 246
|
[2] |
Côté A P, Benin A I, Ockwig N W, O'Keeffe M, Matzger A J and Yaghi O M 2005 Science 310 1166
|
[3] |
Hunt J R, Doonan C J, LeVangie J D, Côté A P and Yaghi O M 2008 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 11872
|
[4] |
Tilford R W, Mugavero III S J, Pellechia P J and Lavigne J J 2008 Adv. Mater. 20 2741
|
[5] |
Wan S, Guo J, Kim J, Ihee H and Jiang D 2008 Angew. Chem. 120 8958
|
[6] |
Spitler E L and Dichtel W R 2010 Nat. Chem. 2 672
|
[7] |
Spitler E, Colson J W, Uribe-Romo F J, Woll A R, Saldivar M R G A and Dichtel W R 2012 Angew. Chem. 124 1
|
[8] |
Klontzas E, Tylianakis E and Froudakis G E 2008 J. Phys. Chem. C 112 9095
|
[9] |
Furukawa H and Yaghi O M 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 8875
|
[10] |
Assfour B and Seifert G 2010 Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 133 59
|
[11] |
Wong-Foy A G, Matzger A J and Yaghi O M 2006 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 3494
|
[12] |
Lan J H, Cao D P and Wang W C 2010 J. Phys. Chem. C 114 3108
|
[13] |
Wu M M, Wang Q, Sun Q, Jena P and Kawazoe Y 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 133 154706
|
[14] |
Zou X L, Zhou G, Duan W H, Choi K and Ihm J 2010 J. Phys. Chem. C 114 13402
|
[15] |
Yang Z L and Cao D P 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 12591
|
[16] |
Mendoza-Cortes J L, Han S and Goddard III W A 2012 J. Phys. Chem. A 116 1621
|
[17] |
Guo J H, Zhang H, Liu Z P and Cheng X L 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 15908
|
[18] |
Suri M, Dornfeld M and Ganz E 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 174703-1
|
[19] |
Ganz E and Dornfeld M 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 3661
|
[20] |
Li Y W and Yang R T 2008 AIChE 54 269
|
[21] |
Lachawiec A J Jr, Qi G and Yang R T 2005 Langmuir 21 11418
|
[22] |
Jiménez V, Ramírez-Lucas A, Sánchez P and Valverde J L 2012 Int. J. Hydrog. Energ. 37 4144
|
[23] |
Lachawiec A J Jr and Yang R T 2008 Langmuir 24 6159
|
[24] |
Li Y W and Yang R T 2006 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 8136
|
[25] |
Kim H S, Lee H, Han K S, Kim J H, Song M S, Park M S, Lee J Y and Kang J U 2005 J. Phys. Chem. B 109 8983
|
[26] |
Lee K, Kim Y H, Sun Y Y, West D, Zhao Y F, Chen Z F and Zhang S B 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 236101
|
[27] |
Wan S, Guo J, Kim J, Ihee H and Jiang D L 2009 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 5439
|
[28] |
Wan S, Guo J, Kim J, Ihee H and Jiang D L 2008 Angew. Chem. 120 8958
|
[29] |
Dogru M, Sonnauer A, Gavryushin A, Knochel P and Bein T 2011 Chem. Commun. 47 1707
|
[30] |
Tilford R W, Gemmill W R, zur Loye H and Lavigne J J 2006 Chem. Mater. 18 5296
|
[31] |
Spitler E L, Koo B T, Novotney J L, Colson J W, Uribe-Romo F J, Gutierrez G D, Clancy P and Dichte l W R 2011 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 19416
|
[32] |
Gupta A, Chempath S, Sanborn M J, Clark L A and Snurr R Q 2003 Mol. Simul. 29 29
|
[33] |
Mayo S L, Olafson B D and Goddard W A 1990 J. Phys. Chem. 94 8897
|
[34] |
Sarkisov L, Duren T and Snurr R Q 2004 Mol. Phys. 102 211
|
[35] |
Garberoglio G, Skoulidas A I and Johnson J K 2005 J. Phys. Chem. B 109 13094
|
[36] |
Duren T, Sarkisov L, Yaghi O M and Snurr R Q 2004 Langmuir 20 2683
|
[37] |
Liu X Y, Wang C Y, Tang Y J, Sun W G and Wu W D 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 036103
|
[38] |
Liu X Y, Wang C Y, Tang Y J, Sun W G, Wu W D, Zhang H Q, Liu M, Yuan L and Xu J J 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 1126 (in Chinese)
|
[39] |
Snurr R Q, Bell A T and Theodorou D N 1993 J. Phys. Chem. 97 13742
|
[40] |
Clark S J, Segall M D, Pickard C J, Hasnip P J, Probert M J, Refson K and Payne M C 2005 Zeitschrift für Kristallographie 220 567
|
[41] |
Perdew J P and Wang Y 1992 Phys. Rev. B 45 13244
|
[42] |
Kaye S S, Dailly A, Yaghi O M and Long J R 2007 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 14176
|
[43] |
Klontzas E, Tylianakis E and Froudakis G E 2008 J. Phys. Chem. C 112 9095
|
[44] |
Garberoglio G, Skoulidas A I and Johnson J K 2005 J. Phys. Chem. B 109 13094
|
[45] |
Llewellyn P L and Maurin G 2005 C. R. Chimie 8 283
|
[46] |
Psofogiannakis G and Froudakis G 2009 J. Phys. Chem. C 113 14908
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|