|
|
Analysis of dynamical properties for the two-site Bose–Hubbard model with an algebraic method |
Meng Xiang-Jia (孟祥佳)a, Feng Hai-Ran (冯海冉)b, Zheng Yu-Jun (郑雨军)a |
a School of Physics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China; b Department of Physics and Information Engineering, Jining University, Qufu 273155, China |
|
|
Abstract In this work, we propose an algebraic recursion method to study the dynamical evolution of the two-site Bose-Hubbard model. We analyze its properties from the viewpoints of single partite purity, energy, and trace distance, in which the model is considered as a typical bipartite system. The analytical expressions for the quantities are derived. We show that the purity can well reflect the transition between different regimes for the system. In addition, we demonstrate that the transition from the delocalization regime to the self-trapping regime with the ratio η increasing not only happens for an initially local state but also for any initial states. Furthermore, we confirm that the dynamics of the system presents a periodicity for η=0 and the period is tc=π/2J when the initial state is symmetric.
|
Received: 15 June 2013
Revised: 17 September 2013
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.75.Kk
|
(Dynamic properties of condensates; collective and hydrodynamic excitations, superfluid flow)
|
|
03.75.Lm
|
(Tunneling, Josephson effect, Bose-Einstein condensates in periodic potentials, solitons, vortices, and topological excitations)
|
|
32.80.Pj
|
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91021009 and 21073110). |
Corresponding Authors:
Zheng Yu-Jun
E-mail: yzheng@sdu.edu.cn
|
About author: 03.75.Kk; 03.75.Lm; 32.80.Pj |
Cite this article:
Meng Xiang-Jia (孟祥佳), Feng Hai-Ran (冯海冉), Zheng Yu-Jun (郑雨军) Analysis of dynamical properties for the two-site Bose–Hubbard model with an algebraic method 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 040305
|
[1] |
Fisher M P A, Weichman P B, Grinstein G and Fisher D S 1989 Phys. Rev. B 40 546
|
[2] |
Kühner T D and Monien H 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 R14741
|
[3] |
Li B and Chen J B 2010 Chin. Phys. Lett. 27 123701
|
[4] |
Romero-Isart O, Eckert K, Rodó C and Sanpera A 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 8019
|
[5] |
Tomadin A, Mannella R and Wimberger S 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 130402
|
[6] |
Bissbort U, Deuretzbacher F and Hofstetter W 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 023617
|
[7] |
Cao H and Zhao Q 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 2187 (in Chinese)
|
[8] |
Jaksch D, Bruder C, Cirac J I, Gardiner C W and Zoller P 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 3108
|
[9] |
Anders P, Gull E, Pollet L, Troyer M and Werner P 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 096402
|
[10] |
Trefzger C and Sengupta K 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 095702
|
[11] |
Chen B L, Kou S P, Zhang Y and Chen S 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 053608
|
[12] |
Sakmann K, Streltsov A I, Alon O E and Cederbaum L S 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 013620
|
[13] |
Collura M, Aufderheide H, Roux G and Karevski D 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 013615
|
[14] |
Pino M, Prior J, Somoza A M, Jaksch D and Clark S R 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 023631
|
[15] |
Xie Y D 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 023201 (in Chinese)
|
[16] |
Ziegler K 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 034701
|
[17] |
Longhi S 2011 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44 051001
|
[18] |
Melé-Messeguer M, Juliá-Díaz B and Polls A 2011 J. Low. Temp. Phys. 165 180
|
[19] |
Mazzarella G, Salasnich L, Parola A and Toigo F 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 053607
|
[20] |
Dell'Anna L 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 053608
|
[21] |
Greiner M, Mandel O, Esslinger T, Hansch T W and Bloch I 2002 Nature 415 39
|
[22] |
Buonsante P and Vezzani A 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 110601
|
[23] |
Deng X and Santos L 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 085138
|
[24] |
Ng K K, Chen Y C and Tzeng Y C 2010 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22 185601
|
[25] |
Xu Y and Li J B 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 110207 (in Chinese)
|
[26] |
Wang Y M and Liang J Q 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 060305
|
[27] |
Zhou L, Liu Z J and Yan W B 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 074205
|
[28] |
Underwood M S and Feder D L 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 052314
|
[29] |
Oktel M Ö, Niţă M and Tanatar B 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 045133
|
[30] |
Ejima S, Fehske H and Gebhard F 2011 Europhys. Lett. 93 30002
|
[31] |
Rossini D and Fazio R 2012 New J. Phys. 14 065012
|
[32] |
Zhang J M and Dong R X 2010 Eur. J. Phys. 31 591
|
[33] |
Wang L, Hao Y and Chen S 2008 Eur. Phys. J. D 48 229
|
[34] |
Teichmann N, Hinrichs D and Holthaus M 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 224515
|
[35] |
Mazzarella G, Moratti M, Salasnich L and Toigo F 2010 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 43 065303
|
[36] |
Breuer H P, Laine E M and Piilo J 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 210401
|
[37] |
Laine E M, Piilo J and Breuer H P 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 062115
|
[38] |
Juliá-Díaz B, Dagnino D, Lewenstein M, Martorell J and Polls A 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 023615
|
[39] |
Yu T 2007 Phys. Lett. A 361 287
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|