| INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Identification of key functional sites for ATPase activity in the OBC protein complex using artificial intelligence approaches |
| Lei Hua(花蕾)1,4,†, Yuhang He(贺宇航)1,2,3,†, Peng Zhao(赵澎)1,†, Jiayao Liu(刘嘉瑶)1, and Kun Shang(尚坤)1,‡ |
| 1 Yan'an Medical College of Yan'an University, Yan'an 716099, China 2 Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics and Laboratory of Soft Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 3 Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan 523830, China 4 NHC Key Laboratory of Systems Biology of Pathogens, National Institute of Pathogen Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 102629, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Microorganisms evolve diverse immune defense systems to protect against phage and viral invasion. The bacteriophage exclusion (BREX) system represents a common bacterial genomic defense mechanism, and preliminary studies indicate that the interaction between BrxC and OrbA proteins (forming the OBC complex) can alter the aggregation pattern of defense system components and modulate immune function. Notably, the adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) domain of this system plays a pivotal role. This study employs optimized network screening (ONS), an artificial intelligence-based integrated analytical approach combining machine learning and deep learning, to identify critical enzymatic active sites in target macromolecular complexes and to provide crucial insights for potential drug target discovery. Through comprehensive ONS analysis of multiple sites, we identified lysine (K73) as a key residue governing the ATPase activity of this protein complex. Following plasmid construction and expression, we successfully purified the OrbA-BrxC (OBC) complex, along with newly engineered OBCK (K73A mutant of the OBC complex) and the negative control OBCE (E255A mutant of the OBC complex). ATPase activity assays demonstrated complete loss of enzymatic function in the OBCK mutant, confirming K73 as the essential catalytic site for BREX system ATPase activity. Comparative analysis revealed minimal differences between OBC and OBCE complexes, but significant divergence from OBCK. The single K73 mutation alone was sufficient to abolish critical enzymatic activity and disrupt BREX system function, achieving efficient complex engineering without requiring multiple mutations. Building on this artificial intelligence methodology, we further analyzed potential functional sites and antigenic epitopes in OBC and OBCK complexes, thereby establishing a research foundation for developing anti-drug-resistant pathogen therapeutics.
|
Received: 25 April 2025
Revised: 12 September 2025
Accepted manuscript online: 18 September 2025
|
|
PACS:
|
87.14.E-
|
(Proteins)
|
| |
87.15.hp
|
(Conformational changes)
|
| |
87.15.km
|
(Protein-protein interactions)
|
| |
87.50.sg
|
(Biophysical mechanisms of interaction)
|
|
| Fund: This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82272308). |
Corresponding Authors:
Kun Shang
E-mail: puospumu@yeah.net
|
Cite this article:
Lei Hua(花蕾), Yuhang He(贺宇航), Peng Zhao(赵澎), Jiayao Liu(刘嘉瑶), and Kun Shang(尚坤) Identification of key functional sites for ATPase activity in the OBC protein complex using artificial intelligence approaches 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 048702
|
[1] Labrie S J, Samson J E and Moineau S 2010 Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8 317 [2] Deveau H, Garneau J E and Moineau S 2010 Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 64 475 [3] Wang J Y, Pausch P and Doudna J A 2022 Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20 641 [4] Tock M R and Dryden D T F 2005 Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 8 466 [5] Stokar-Avihail A, Fedorenko T, Hör J, Garb J, Leavitt A, Millman A, Shulman G, Wojtania N, Melamed S, Amitai G and Sorek R 2023 Cell 186 1863 [6] Goldfarb T, Sberro H, Weinstock E, Cohen O, Doron S, Charpak- Amikam Y, Afik S, Ofir G and Sorek R 2015 EMBO J. 34 169 [7] Tesson F, Hervé A, Mordret E, Touchon M, d'Humières C, Cury J and Bernheim A 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 2561 [8] Gordeeva J, Morozova N, Sierro N, Isaev A, Sinkunas T, Tsvetkova K, Matlashov M, Truncaite L, Morgan R D, Ivanov N V, Siksnys V, Zeng L and Severinov K 2019 Nucleic Acids Res. 47 253 [9] Beck I N, Picton D M and Blower T R 2022 Curr. Res. Struct. Biol. 4 211 [10] Shen B W, Doyle L A, Werther R, Westburg A A, Bies D P, Walter S I, Luyten Y A, Morgan R D, Stoddard B L and Kaiser B K 2023 Nucleic Acids Res. 51 3513 [11] Zaworski J, Dagva O, Brandt J, Baum C, Ettwiller L, Fomenkov A and Raleigh E A 2022 PLoS Genet. 18 e1009943 [12] Isaev A, Drobiazko A, Sierro N, Gordeeva J, Yosef I, Qimron U, Ivanov N V and Severinov K 2020 Nucleic Acids Res. 48 5397 [13] Andriianov A, Trigüis S, Drobiazko A, Sierro N, Ivanov N V, Selmer M, Severinov K and Isaev A 2023 Cell Rep. 42 112972 [14] LeGault K N, Hays S G, Angermeyer A, McKitterick A C, Johura F T, Sultana M, Ahmed T, Alam M and Seed K D 2021 Science 373 eabg2166 [15] Li S, Xu T, Meng X, Yan Y, Zhou Y, Duan L, Tang Y, Zhu L and Sun L 2024 Nucleic Acids Res. 52 8580 [16] Drobiazko A, Adams M C, Skutel M, Potekhina K, Kotovskaya O, Trofimova A, Matlashov M, Yatselenko D, Maxwell K L, Blower T R, Severinov K, Ghilarov D and Isaev A 2025 Nat. Commun. 16 1825 [17] Studier F W and Movva N R 1976 J. Virol. 19 136 [18] Oshiro R T, Dunham D T and Seed K D 2024 J. Bacteriol. 206 e0020624 [19] Li J, Cheng R, Wang Z, Yuan W, Xiao J, Zhao X, Du X, Xia S, Wang L, Zhu B and Wang L 2024 Nature 629 467 [20] Gupta R, Srivastava D, Sahu M, Tiwari S, Ambasta R K and Kumar P 2021 Mol. Divers. 25 1315 [21] White S R and Lauring B 2007 Traffic 8 1657 [22] Li Y, Li Z, Yan P, Hua C, Kong J, Wu W, Cui Y, Duan Y, Li S, Li G, Ji S, Chen Y, Zhao Y, Yang P, Hu C, Lu M, Chen M and Xiao Y 2025 Science 387 eadr0393 [23] Kelly M, Dietz C, Kasson S, Zhang Y, HoltzmanMJ and Kim I K 2024 Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 720 150101 [24] Neagu A N, Josan C L, Jayaweera T M, Morrissiey H, Johnson K R and Darie C C 2024 Molecules 29 4156 [25] Ryšlavá H, Doubnerová V, Kavan D and Vaněk O 2013 J. Proteomics 92 80 [26] Liu J, Xu X, Zhong H, Yu M, Abuduaini N, Zhang S, Yang X and Feng B 2024 Biomedicines 12 1446 [27] Cilek N, Ugurel E, Goksel E and Yalcin O 2024 J. Cell. Physiol. 239 e30958 [28] Sun D, Zhu K, Wang L, Mu Z, Wu K, Hua L, Qin B, Gao X, Wang Y and Cui S 2024 Cell Rep. 43 114391 [29] Gao X, Shang K, Zhu K, Wang L, Mu Z, Fu X, Yu X, Qin B, Zhu H, Ding W and Cui S 2024 Nature 625 822 [30] Wang Y, Tian Y, Yang X, Yu F and Zheng J 2025 Nat. Commun. 16 2408 [31] Gao X, Zhu K, Qin B, Olieric V, Wang M and Cui S 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 2843 [32] Gao X, Mu Z, Qin B, Sun Y and Cui S 2017 Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 7 411 [33] Laskowski R A, MacArthur M W, Moss D S and Thornton J M 1993 J. Appl. Cryst. 26 283 [34] Lüthy R, Bowie J U and Eisenberg D 1992 Nature 356 83 [35] Colovos C and Yeates T O 1993 Protein Sci. 2 1511 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|